@ademska I've had a strong infatuation for someone I really hated once. D: Took a long time to get over it too.
ETA for top, fresh off the dA presses...

Justice by Corbie
Modifié par beckaliz, 19 juillet 2011 - 04:34 .

Modifié par beckaliz, 19 juillet 2011 - 04:34 .
maxernst wrote...
ademska wrote...
bingo.Evilnor wrote...
He basically says Hawke will always be second place. Something about Hawke is the most important thing in his life, but some things are more important than his life. If it was just a choice between his own death and Hawke's, he'd choose his own, but between Hawke and his cause, the cause comes first.
this is perfect.
Huh? He's just said that he would sacrifice you to further his cause. He couldn't possibly say it any more clearly.
Ryzaki wrote...
maxernst wrote...
Fair enough, though I do think that trying to trick Hawke into helping him blow up the chantry is a betrayal. It's mostly this idea Anders loves Hawke so much no matter what, even if you don't romance him, more deeply and truly than any of the other companions that I take issue with. To be honest, it would be a hard for a friend-path to be roleplayed consistently and still side with the Templars, and I don't find rivalmances very psychologically convincing. I find it hard to comprehend Anders loving someone who doesn't share his commitment to his most cherished values.
Just for clarification, my Hawke sided with the mages but was furious with Anders for putting him in that position and wanted nothing to do with him. He didn't kill him on impulse, maybe because he thought Anders execution should be performed by the authorities after a trial, but was too angry to even talk to him when he showed up at the gallows.
I did feel the bolded was a betrayal. Especially since Anders tricked my Hawke into helping him with the one thing he knew would get him to help. Getting rid of Justice. Then he blackmails Hawke with that "if you loved me you'd help me." line. Once Hawke sees the Chantry go up...upmost betrayal. Mostly due to the fact that Anders used him to do that and lied about it.
I manage to friendpath and then side with the templars just fine though it is a very invidiual YMMV sort of thing.
maxernst wrote...
Did you side with the Templars to punish Anders? I can understand that psychologically, but it's awfully petty. I think if my Hawke had known that it would be possible to spare the mages who surrendered, including Bethany, he might have sided with the Templars as the best option for Kirkwall's future, but without metagaming, I have to assume I'm going to have to kill ALL the mages.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 juillet 2011 - 05:36 .
maxernst wrote...
Did you side with the Templars to punish Anders? I can understand that psychologically, but it's awfully petty. I think if my Hawke had known that it would be possible to spare the mages who surrendered, including Bethany, he might have sided with the Templars as the best option for Kirkwall's future, but without metagaming, I have to assume I'm going to have to kill ALL the mages.
Modifié par beckaliz, 19 juillet 2011 - 05:35 .
Tidra wrote...
Oh my god. If you break up with Anders on a rivalmance with a sarcastic Hawke she tells him "SORRY, YOU JUST WEREN'T THAT GOOD!"
HAHAH. Woooowww. That is HARSH.
The game is still relatively new to me so I didn't quite know about all these things, good thing for youtube videos.
Guest_Queen-Of-Stuff_*
YamiSnuffles wrote...
Well, I went over this ages ago, but, new people and all so here goes...
I won't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't want Anders to put his relationship with Hawke ahead of his cause. He's trying to do something huge. Something way more important than any relationship he might be in. So he loves Hawke, but if he has to choose between being with Hawke or doing what he can to free the mages, he can't choose Hawke.
To me it would be sort of like if there was no Dark Ritual in Origins and the Warden was with Alistair. They have two options; 1) one of them can die to save the world, effectively ending their future together, or 2) they can run off together and hope that Riordan saves the day. It would be hugely irresponsible for them to put all of that on Riordan just so they could be happy together. Anders has a similar problem at the end of DA2. He can; 1) sacrifice his life and relationship in order to do something to hopefully free mages or at least give them a fighting chance, or 2) run off with Hawke and hope that someone else does something eventually to free mages.
If Anders chooses Hawke, he's saying that s/he's more important than the freedom of mages. Which, to me, is horrible. It's far worse if you put the order as Hawke> Mage Freedom> Everything Else, than if you put Mage Freedom first. Of course, this is why I pair a passionate, revolutionary Hawke with Anders. For one, it should mean that he won't have to choose between the cause or Hawke. For another, it means she wouldn't ever want him to put her before the cause.
So, maybe it's sad to some people. For me, it makes me think more of him that he has something he would put so far above his own personal happiness. If you want to be the center of the universe in a relationship, you probably shouldn't get involved with a crazy revolutionary.
YamiSnuffles wrote...
Well, I went over this ages ago, but, new people and all so here goes...
I won't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't want Anders to put his relationship with Hawke ahead of his cause. He's trying to do something huge. Something way more important than any relationship he might be in. So he loves Hawke, but if he has to choose between being with Hawke or doing what he can to free the mages, he can't choose Hawke.
To me it would be sort of like if there was no Dark Ritual in Origins and the Warden was with Alistair. They have two options; 1) one of them can die to save the world, effectively ending their future together, or 2) they can run off together and hope that Riordan saves the day. It would be hugely irresponsible for them to put all of that on Riordan just so they could be happy together. Anders has a similar problem at the end of DA2. He can; 1) sacrifice his life and relationship in order to do something to hopefully free mages or at least give them a fighting chance, or 2) run off with Hawke and hope that someone else does something eventually to free mages.
If Anders chooses Hawke, he's saying that s/he's more important than the freedom of mages. Which, to me, is horrible. It's far worse if you put the order as Hawke> Mage Freedom> Everything Else, than if you put Mage Freedom first. Of course, this is why I pair a passionate, revolutionary Hawke with Anders. For one, it should mean that he won't have to choose between the cause or Hawke. For another, it means she wouldn't ever want him to put her before the cause.
So, maybe it's sad to some people. For me, it makes me think more of him that he has something he would put so far above his own personal happiness. If you want to be the center of the universe in a relationship, you probably shouldn't get involved with a crazy revolutionary.

Modifié par SurelyForth, 19 juillet 2011 - 02:49 .
SurelyForth wrote...
For those that care! New prompt is up at Manifestos Welcome.
Guest_ElleMullineux_*
Modifié par SurelyForth, 19 juillet 2011 - 03:12 .
Guest_ElleMullineux_*
ElleMullineux wrote...
NSFW Anders is for tumblr... I'd feel like I was flashing in the chantry posting it here.
ElleMullineux wrote...
NSFW Anders is for tumblr... I'd feel like I was flashing in the chantry posting it here.
Guest_ElleMullineux_*
SurelyForth wrote...
For those that care! New prompt is up at Manifestos Welcome.
Modifié par beckaliz, 19 juillet 2011 - 03:37 .
YamiSnuffles wrote...
Well, I went over this ages ago, but, new people and all so here goes...
I won't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't want Anders to put his relationship with Hawke ahead of his cause. He's trying to do something huge. Something way more important than any relationship he might be in. So he loves Hawke, but if he has to choose between being with Hawke or doing what he can to free the mages, he can't choose Hawke.
To me it would be sort of like if there was no Dark Ritual in Origins and the Warden was with Alistair. They have two options; 1) one of them can die to save the world, effectively ending their future together, or 2) they can run off together and hope that Riordan saves the day. It would be hugely irresponsible for them to put all of that on Riordan just so they could be happy together. Anders has a similar problem at the end of DA2. He can; 1) sacrifice his life and relationship in order to do something to hopefully free mages or at least give them a fighting chance, or 2) run off with Hawke and hope that someone else does something eventually to free mages.
If Anders chooses Hawke, he's saying that s/he's more important than the freedom of mages. Which, to me, is horrible. It's far worse if you put the order as Hawke> Mage Freedom> Everything Else, than if you put Mage Freedom first. Of course, this is why I pair a passionate, revolutionary Hawke with Anders. For one, it should mean that he won't have to choose between the cause or Hawke. For another, it means she wouldn't ever want him to put her before the cause.
So, maybe it's sad to some people. For me, it makes me think more of him that he has something he would put so far above his own personal happiness. If you want to be the center of the universe in a relationship, you probably shouldn't get involved with a crazy revolutionary.
Modifié par Tidra, 19 juillet 2011 - 04:25 .
YamiSnuffles wrote...
Well, I went over this ages ago, but, new people and all so here goes...
I won't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't want Anders to put his relationship with Hawke ahead of his cause. He's trying to do something huge. Something way more important than any relationship he might be in. So he loves Hawke, but if he has to choose between being with Hawke or doing what he can to free the mages, he can't choose Hawke.
To me it would be sort of like if there was no Dark Ritual in Origins and the Warden was with Alistair. They have two options; 1) one of them can die to save the world, effectively ending their future together, or 2) they can run off together and hope that Riordan saves the day. It would be hugely irresponsible for them to put all of that on Riordan just so they could be happy together. Anders has a similar problem at the end of DA2. He can; 1) sacrifice his life and relationship in order to do something to hopefully free mages or at least give them a fighting chance, or 2) run off with Hawke and hope that someone else does something eventually to free mages.
If Anders chooses Hawke, he's saying that s/he's more important than the freedom of mages. Which, to me, is horrible. It's far worse if you put the order as Hawke> Mage Freedom> Everything Else, than if you put Mage Freedom first. Of course, this is why I pair a passionate, revolutionary Hawke with Anders. For one, it should mean that he won't have to choose between the cause or Hawke. For another, it means she wouldn't ever want him to put her before the cause.
So, maybe it's sad to some people. For me, it makes me think more of him that he has something he would put so far above his own personal happiness. If you want to be the center of the universe in a relationship, you probably shouldn't get involved with a crazy revolutionary.