Jennifer Brandes Hepler wrote...
I always felt that thing about rivalry relationships in DA (for everyone, but particularly Anders) is that they're all talk, no action, and that's why they're still a form of relationship instead of the termination of that relationship. Gaining rivalry points with Fenris is a very different thing than actually turning him over to Danarius. When you are earning rivalry points, it means you are still loyal to the character, and they are still loyal to you, despite your disagreements.
When I wrote rival Hawke, I was imagining her gnashing her teeth in frustration that Anders can't see the mess he's made of his life, and he's just as frustrated that she can't see that he's in the right about it. She tries to shock him out of his acceptance of what he's become to force him to see that Justice has corrupted him (and ultimately succeeds when they split sufficiently for Justice to just take over and do the bombing, albeit not in a way that ends up benefiting anyone). Anders, for his part, recognizes that for all that Hawke says, she's saying it out of concern for him, since if she really just saw him as unsaveable, she would turn him over to the templars. It's certainly not a healthy relationship, but it's definitely a dynamic that exists in real life (granted, in real life, they've usually had time to build a foundation of that relationship *before* the crazy starts, but I thought it was at least a dynamic some people would relate to).
P.S. I love that 2000+ pages later, you guys are still actually talking about the character. Thanks for all the love.
Thanks for posting! He's a great character.
I think the post-Justice quest argument between Anders and a rival Hawke who is romancing him really gets this dynamic across, especially if you pick the diplomatic and sarcastic options (haven't picked the aggressive ones except for the one when Justice comes out).
Edit: Picture and corrected sentence.
Modifié par LT123, 08 août 2011 - 01:58 .





Retour en haut











