Aller au contenu

Photo

The Anders Thread: Flash Fic Contest! Details on Pg. 2274


57020 réponses à ce sujet

#55001
Nilfalasiel

Nilfalasiel
  • Members
  • 1 741 messages

gaurdian9sunshine wrote...

I don't think it was a mistake at all. It's no secret that Fenris and Anders didn't get along very well. He would rather have Fenris gone than him supporting the templars.


There's a difference between wanting someone gone and being happy that they're being sold into slavery. Slavery is never something Anders has condoned, especially considering how much importance he places on freedom in general.

@ cowoline: Sorry for the mental image!

Edit: Have Anders' reaction to Aveline's courtship methods as ToP.

Posted Image

Modifié par Nilfalasiel, 01 avril 2012 - 12:59 .


#55002
cowoline

cowoline
  • Members
  • 261 messages

Nilfalasiel wrote...

gaurdian9sunshine wrote...

I don't think it was a mistake at all. It's no secret that Fenris and Anders didn't get along very well. He would rather have Fenris gone than him supporting the templars.


There's a difference between wanting someone gone and being happy that they're being sold into slavery. Slavery is never something Anders has condoned, especially considering how much importance he places on freedom in general.

@ cowoline: Sorry for the mental image!

Edit: Have Anders' reaction to Aveline's courtship methods as ToP.


Ha!:lol: Thank you.... now i can spend the next few moments giggiling at ".. the mother of all awkaward ones, but still.." :D

#55003
slashthedragon

slashthedragon
  • Members
  • 348 messages

Nilfalasiel wrote...

gaurdian9sunshine wrote...

I don't think it was a mistake at all. It's no secret that Fenris and Anders didn't get along very well. He would rather have Fenris gone than him supporting the templars.


There's a difference between wanting someone gone and being happy that they're being sold into slavery. Slavery is never something Anders has condoned, especially considering how much importance he places on freedom in general.


I tend to think of it as poor writing, just something said to show that you are getting points from Anders for doing what you did.
Alternatvely though, you could say Anders is sucking up to Hawke by aggreing with the choice.
Either way leaves a bad taste in my mouth...

#55004
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

slashthedragon wrote...

I tend to think of it as poor writing, just something said to show that you are getting points from Anders for doing what you did.


I agree; it's bad writing.  Anders is TOO GREAT a character for me to hold him to this ONE crappy bit of writing in his storyline.  Anders is a good guy, and he may not like Fenris, but I doubt he wishes him harm.  I think in Anders' mind, Fenris is just stubborn and refuses to see that the Circle is not the safe haven for mages it's proported to be; Anders also hates how Fenris' hatred of magisters leads him to mistrust (NOT hate) all mages in general, and that just frustrates him.

But I don't see him gleefully selling Fenris into slavery; that's just absurd.

Another example of bad writing are the character reactions after The Last Straw.  Aveline and Fenris happily supporting the murder of innocents is bizarre and story-breaking.  

#55005
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

slashthedragon wrote...

I tend to think of it as poor writing, just something said to show that you are getting points from Anders for doing what you did.


I agree; it's bad writing.  Anders is TOO GREAT a character for me to hold him to this ONE crappy bit of writing in his storyline.  Anders is a good guy, and he may not like Fenris, but I doubt he wishes him harm.  I think in Anders' mind, Fenris is just stubborn and refuses to see that the Circle is not the safe haven for mages it's proported to be; Anders also hates how Fenris' hatred of magisters leads him to mistrust (NOT hate) all mages in general, and that just frustrates him.

But I don't see him gleefully selling Fenris into slavery; that's just absurd.

Another example of bad writing are the character reactions after The Last Straw.  Aveline and Fenris happily supporting the murder of innocents is bizarre and story-breaking.  


Nah.... The last straw is logical. Fenris hate mages, and he supports stopping the mages at whatever prize. He does not think of them as innocent. A mage is never innocent in Fenris eyes. And I don't think he is happy about it. Aveline does not support Meridith. She supports order and thus comes with a statement in that regard. and I might add that it is next to impossible to get her to actually turn on you. You basically have to make her really, really disrespect you. (Remember rivalry = respect). Maker know I've tried that three times, right now.

#55006
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

esper wrote...

Nah.... The last straw is logical. Fenris hate mages, and he supports stopping the mages at whatever prize. He does not think of them as innocent. A mage is never innocent in Fenris eyes. And I don't think he is happy about it. Aveline does not support Meridith. She supports order and thus comes with a statement in that regard. and I might add that it is next to impossible to get her to actually turn on you. You basically have to make her really, really disrespect you. (Remember rivalry = respect). Maker know I've tried that three times, right now.


I hesitate to discuss this in the Anders thread :P *forgive me, Anders fans* but no, Fenris doesn't hate mages.  He respects mage!Hawke and he respects Bethany.  He DISTRUSTS mages because he believes power corrupts.  He thinks they should voluntarily go to the Circle simply because they ought to understand that they are constantly in danger of giving in to temptation.  He doesn't think all mages should be slaughtered or made tranquil outright.  He's not a raving lunatic or anything.  It would make more sense for him to advocate assassinating Anders after CHANTRY GO BOOM then to gleefully agree that they should murder every person in the Circle simply because they, too, are mages.  Fenris has never, EVER advocated killing a mage who wasn't a blood mage or what have you.  He always just advocates sending them back to the Circle.

EDIT: I've also never sided with the templars, but I imagine the reason they cooked up to get Merrill to agree to slaughter innocent mages is rather absurd!

Modifié par motomotogirl, 01 avril 2012 - 08:10 .


#55007
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

esper wrote...

Nah.... The last straw is logical. Fenris hate mages, and he supports stopping the mages at whatever prize. He does not think of them as innocent. A mage is never innocent in Fenris eyes. And I don't think he is happy about it. Aveline does not support Meridith. She supports order and thus comes with a statement in that regard. and I might add that it is next to impossible to get her to actually turn on you. You basically have to make her really, really disrespect you. (Remember rivalry = respect). Maker know I've tried that three times, right now.


I hesitate to discuss this in the Anders thread :P *forgive me, Anders fans* but no, Fenris doesn't hate mages.  He respects mage!Hawke and he respects Bethany.  He DISTRUSTS mages because he believes power corrupts.  He thinks they should voluntarily go to the Circle simply because they ought to understand that they are constantly in danger of giving in to temptation.  He doesn't think all mages should be slaughtered or made tranquil outright.  He's not a raving lunatic or anything.  It would make more sense for him to advocate assassinating Anders after CHANTRY GO BOOM then to gleefully agree that they should murder every person in the Circle simply because they, too, are mages.  Fenris has never, EVER advocated killing a mage who wasn't a blood mage or what have you.  He always just advocates sending them back to the Circle.

EDIT: I've also never sided with the templars, but I imagine the reason they cooked up to get Merrill to agree to slaughter innocent mages is rather absurd!


I agree that distrust is a better word, but he still does not think of the mages as innocent (a mage is never innocent in his eyes, or at least their innocence doesn't negate their danger) so when the choice is between freeing the mages or killing them, he will pick killing them. Hawke and Bethany are example of two individuals he knows. The circle mages are, unknown and only mages which should not be trusted on face value from him.

Merill is pretty much: I love Hawke over you (to the mages). Basically trusting in your friends judgement even if you know if is wrong. Hawke simply just mean more to her than the faceless masses of the circle mages which is not riducules it is human (albeit it makes me think slightly less of her in that situation). Isabella is the same.

The one time where I did try to side with the templars I ended up with only Hawke, Fenris, Varric and Aveline on the team, the rest permantly left. I think it was a very fitting punishment for doing something so wrong. And reloaded when I felt sick wathing the templars kneel before me.

#55008
slashthedragon

slashthedragon
  • Members
  • 348 messages

motomotogirl wrote...  

It would make more sense for him to advocate assassinating Anders after CHANTRY GO BOOM then to gleefully agree that they should murder every person in the Circle simply because they, too, are mages.


Isn't Fenris' line concerning Anders something like "Kill him because that's what he wants?"  It's not the friendliest thing to say, but it doesn't come of as bad as "murder the scum", if that makes sense.

Again, I have to say that there were some bad dialogue written in, that seems to appear concerning Anders and Fenris in certain playthroughs.  Fenris, for example, likes you more if you kill Anders in the Fade, if I remember correctly.  I have to ignore things like that because it really doesn't sit well with me.  I just can't imagine that two people, if they HATE each other so much, would ever be able to work/fight together. 


Edited because I wrote "Anders in Fenris".  OMG mind.

Modifié par slashthedragon, 01 avril 2012 - 08:40 .


#55009
Cantina

Cantina
  • Members
  • 2 210 messages
Well the writing was generally a mess throughout the game;
it certainly was not knitted together in as it was in Origins.

As someone mentioned here I think the whole “hand over
Feneris to Danarius” with Anders, agreeing was mostly to get a few extra points
in case the player needed them.

At any rate the way I see it is, despite Feneris and Anders
having differences of opinion, if your friendship with Feneris is high enough
he will stay with you if you side with the mages. I tend to look at it from a viewpoint
that Feneris is willing to work with Anders and the mages for the sake of friendship.


I saw the Templar ending on YouTube; I cannot push my
character into siding with the Templars even for a damn achievement. I have,
well, a strong opinion on the Templars needing a serious ass kicking. Of course,
my thoughts and feelings on the Templars are probably no different from how
Anders feels about them. Shame that the player’s thoughts on mages/templars was
not incorporated better in the game.

<Shrugs> From my viewpoint the story seems so damn
fragmented. Of course, that follows into feeling jipped by the whole Anders
romance.

#55010
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

slashthedragon wrote...

Edited because I wrote "Anders in Fenris".  OMG mind.


LOLOLOLOLOLOL Okay, no lie, I laughed so hard :lol:

#55011
Cantina

Cantina
  • Members
  • 2 210 messages
Just out of curiosity…..

Most of us are no doubt aware of how, well I guess cheated
would be the right word here on the romance went-writting wise I mean.

Despite this, what were your feelings on the relationship
for your main character and what direction did you take them?

Modifié par Cantina, 02 avril 2012 - 03:16 .


#55012
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages
I'm not sure I understand the question *rubs chin* I enjoyed the relationship each time and always supported mages?

#55013
Cantina

Cantina
  • Members
  • 2 210 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

I'm not sure I understand the question *rubs chin* I enjoyed the relationship each time and always supported mages?


Sorry, I'll try to explain it better.

Which did you go, rivlary, friendship? Did you feel sorry for Anders? Did you runaway with him? Things like that.

Basically what were you choices and thoughts on the relationship.

#55014
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages
 Okay, I see :D

Well I had two Hawke's who romanced Anders, Xander (rogue) and Lachlan (mage)

Xander is a flirt who never intended to fall in love.  When he fell for Anders, he tried to keep things light, always joking and teasing and sometimes ticking Anders off, who is not always very amendable to the sarcastic responses lol But it was definitely a friendship romance, not the rivalry romance.  Xander has zero opinion on magic and mages; he likes PEOPLE, not ideas, and so he was quite friendly (and doted upon) Merrill and had no problem with blood magic.  So it took a bit longer to get full friendship with Anders for Xander because Anders often disapproved of Xander's responses to things like blood magic.  He didn't feel sorry for Anders; he just thought he was hot lol and then, well, he fell in love, so he supported Anders 100%.  They definitely ran away together, and I suspect Xander tries to keep Anders out of trouble lol

Lachlan Hawke admired Anders, a fellow mage who was older and more experienced than him and who had high ideals about freedom and such.  He did sleep around before finally consummating the romnce with Anders, but mostly because he was nervous about starting a relationship with the man.  It was a friendship romance.  He didn't feel sorry for him; he looked up to him.  They ran away together after the game and I don't doubt Lachlan continues to support Anders and do everything to help him realize his goal of freedom for all mages in Thedas.

As for my personal opinions, I don't feel sorry for any of the characters; I don't judge them, either.  I just admire them as marvelously written characters, and I enjoy re-telling the story over and over again with each of my different Hawke's.

#55015
gaurdian9sunshine

gaurdian9sunshine
  • Members
  • 73 messages

Cantina wrote...

motomotogirl wrote...

I'm not sure I understand the question *rubs chin* I enjoyed the relationship each time and always supported mages?


Sorry, I'll try to explain it better.

Which did you go, rivlary, friendship? Did you feel sorry for Anders? Did you runaway with him? Things like that.

Basically what were you choices and thoughts on the relationship.


Even in Orgins, I never really liked the chantry. I have never had a playthrough where Hawke supports the templars, not even for the achievement. Its hard to listen to most of the banter convrosations Anders has with companions in act 3 because he thinks he is going to die soon. My Hawke loves Anders because of his passion and determination to free mages. She runs away with him because she cannot imagine a world without him in it. 

#55016
cowoline

cowoline
  • Members
  • 261 messages

Cantina wrote...

motomotogirl wrote...

I'm not sure I understand the question *rubs chin* I enjoyed the relationship each time and always supported mages?


Sorry, I'll try to explain it better.

Which did you go, rivlary, friendship? Did you feel sorry for Anders? Did you runaway with him? Things like that.

Basically what were you choices and thoughts on the relationship.


I usally go friendship with him, since it seems that Justice doesn't destroy him has rappidly as when you rival him (wich makes sence compared to what people who have a depression go through. The support from people you love influences how you deal with it).

Even when i rival him i support mages and run away with him. I have seen many here accusing him of betraying hawke, but imo he doesn't. He doesn't tell hawke the whole truth, but it is his way of protecting her. Besides he tells hawke exactly what his opinion is on the mages and chantry. don't get me wrong was choked in the first playthrough that he blew up the thing, but probably should have seen it comming:P

As for feeling sorry for him, maybe a little. But that might be because I am suffering from depression and can relate to lot of the things he is going through. Sadly you don't need a fadespirit to feel like you are fighting yourself:)

#55017
Cantina

Cantina
  • Members
  • 2 210 messages
Since I asked the question, I can say it is interesting and
not too far off from how I built my character. I’m a role player so forgive me
for putting a lot of thought into this.

In Origins, I was not on board with the Chantry or the
Templars. While playing Dragon Age 2 I can say that my views on them intensified
into wanting to kill every one of the bastards.

Considering my main character is a mage and has been through
hell her whole life, she agrees with Anders thoughts and in some ways admires
him. However, she cannot help but falling completely and utterly in love with
him. She is fully aware of the spirit inside Anders, but she refuses to allow
that to stop her and Anders from having a chance at having something. She also believes
that together they can push mages to freedom.  Telsa has said to herself a few times, “I’d
rather die in or at the hands of someone I love then to the hate and anger of
my enemy.”

When it comes to the end of the game, Telsa does not feel
betrayed or heartbroken over what Anders did; she understands why he lied and
why he did what he did.  She feels what was done to the Chantry was necessary, not entirely right, but necessary.

When it comes time to choose Anders fate, she chose to save him for two reasons. He gave her even more strength to stand up and fight and she cannot kill someone she feels that did something that was necessary.

Beyond that even IF there was a small ounce of hate in her for his actions, she
believes allowing someone to live with the consequences of their actions is
better than taking the easy way out.

In the end she stays with Anders and they run away together
to continue to not only love each other but to fight for the freedom of mages.

My main character is so in love with Anders that she cannot
imagine her life without him. If death were to come upon Anders, no doubt Telsa
would follow him.

Modifié par Cantina, 03 avril 2012 - 12:53 .


#55018
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages
If we are sharing Hawkes... My Marian (canon) Hawke is so anti-chantry as she can be. She is a blood mage and is keenly aware that it is the chantry that forced her to move from town to town when they were little, furthermore when her sister is smashed by an ogre which the Maker according to the chantry brought up, she stops believing in the chant.

She fells in love with Anders as he is, Justice is a part of the man and she accepts that it is a abomination she fell in love with.

She feels very conflicted about him lying to her, part of her is angry that he didn't trust her, part of her is understands it, mostly she is relived because if she had told her she would have come into a conflict between her duty as a championn and her feeling as a mage.

As for the explosion itself, by act three my Hawke was ready to do worse, much worse.

The thought to kill him never crossed her mind, and it makes her mad that it crossed his.

I see their relationship as sort of resonating with itself, they so agree with each other that they help convince the other that they are completely right, making both constantly less compromising.

#55019
gaurdian9sunshine

gaurdian9sunshine
  • Members
  • 73 messages
Even though my cannon Hawke isn't a mage she wants to see mages free as other men. She is farily bitter that her entire family had to keep moving all the time because 'the templars are coming'. She isn't bitter to Bethany or her father, but the chantry. When in Kirkwall, she sees blood mage after blood mage and she feels the templars push them to do that. She doesn't condone blood magic but understands why mages do it. She helps and supports Anders because she wants mages to live free and because she really cares about him. She wasn't mad at him for lying to her but she is upset with him because he thought she was going to kill him and because he had to go through it alone.

#55020
Guest_Alexa__*

Guest_Alexa__*
  • Guests

gaurdian9sunshine wrote...

Even though my cannon Hawke isn't a mage she wants to see mages free as other men. She is farily bitter that her entire family had to keep moving all the time because 'the templars are coming'. She isn't bitter to Bethany or her father, but the chantry. When in Kirkwall, she sees blood mage after blood mage and she feels the templars push them to do that. She doesn't condone blood magic but understands why mages do it. She helps and supports Anders because she wants mages to live free and because she really cares about him. She wasn't mad at him for lying to her but she is upset with him because he thought she was going to kill him and because he had to go through it alone.


Same was my fHawke! I just cannot understand how Hawke should be able to kill the man she loves, even if he did what he did! She loves him ... and she forgives him anything he did and is ever going to do!

#55021
The Librarian

The Librarian
  • Members
  • 41 messages
Love is never an excuse nor does it justify an act of terrorism. All my Hawke's stand by moral and justice. They support the mages as it should be. But unlike most others here it seems they are not hypocrites. Supporting and helping Anders and then claim to believe in justice.... Urgh <__<
Anders always ends up with dagger between his shoulder blades when justice and moral prevail.

#55022
hobbit of the shire

hobbit of the shire
  • Members
  • 364 messages
If I played my Hawke without metagaming, while she did love Anders, she wouldn't have been able to forgive him for what he had done. She wouldn't have had the heart to kill him, but she would've been unable to love him the way that she used to do. Did she still love him? In some ways, yes, but would she condone his actions? No. So, it'd be sort of like a parent/murderer situation. You can't not really love your son, yet you can't forgive him. There will always be a thorn in the relationship.

#55023
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

The Librarian wrote...

Love is never an excuse nor does it justify an act of terrorism. All my Hawke's stand by moral and justice. They support the mages as it should be. But unlike most others here it seems they are not hypocrites. Supporting and helping Anders and then claim to believe in justice.... Urgh <__<
Anders always ends up with dagger between his shoulder blades when justice and moral prevail.


I am going to quote the one thing I agree with Elthina on: 'Death is never justice.'

That being said I believe that Anders act was and act of Justice, not towards Elthina or the innocent who dies (because nobody deserves death as a punishment). 
But because such a violent act is needed to bring justice towards the mages unjusticely trapped in the circle system and the mages who would have been unjusticely trapped inside the system in the future. Justice works towards the now or the future not the past.

Killing Anders for killing Elthina is not justice, killing Elthina and the innocent is not justice. Both those act a vengance. Forcing the mages to fight is not justice, but pragmatism. 

Taking the first steps towards destroying and unjust system is, however, justice.

You can never kill someone and take the moral highground. You can kill someone and say it was a necessety for one reason or another.

#55024
Cantina

Cantina
  • Members
  • 2 210 messages

The Librarian wrote...

Love is never an excuse nor does it justify an act of terrorism. All my Hawke's stand by moral and justice. They support the mages as it should be. But unlike most others here it seems they are not hypocrites. Supporting and helping Anders and then claim to believe in justice.... Urgh <__<
Anders always ends up with dagger between his shoulder blades when justice and moral prevail.






No offense to you or to anyone here, but it really grits my
teeth to hear Anders being called a “terrorist.” Beyond that, I shake my head
to hear those people who killed him, simply because there pissed at what he
did. That is your game, your opinion, but I highly disagree with it.

The way I see things is what Anders did needed to be done,
not exactly the right thing to do but it needed to be done. The Chantry for
over a thousand years has punished mages and used their religion to whip the
populace into fear about the mages. Sure, other Circles outside of Kirkwall
were no were near as bad, but Kirkwall was proof of how bad things can get and
the Chantry does nothing to step in.

Elthina was preaching that she does not agree with Meredith’s
methods, yet allowed her to continue to do them. The Grand Cleric was offered
outside help from the Divine to calm the storm before it got worse and told Elthina
to leave and she refused. Elthina believed she could settle the dispute with
cookies and tea, but when you have argument that was festering for seven years
then add a thousand years on top of that, peaceful talks are not going to work.


Elthina was trying to save the system, because she knows
that without the Templar Order the Chantry would be nothing. She acts as if she
is trying to calm the dispute, but taking a step back, she does nothing, all
Elthina was doing was making the situation worse not better.

The Templars and Chantry forced Anders to do what he did.
Instead of to finding a solution through peaceful means (which was not going to
happen), he pushed the Templars and Mages in open war. You think it is better
for the mages to sit back, be completely powerless, letting Meradith continue down
her path of crushing the mages while the Chantry looks on and twiddles their thumbs.


I do not believe Anders was solely responsible for his actions;
he did after all have a spirit of Justice inside him who no doubt had a larger
hand in the destruction of the Chantry. Besides if, Anders did not destroy the
Chantry, chances of an open war with the mages and Templars was bound to
happen. Other mages such as the Revolutionist were already pushing for war with
their actions. People like to point fingers at Anders, but refuse to
acknowledge what other mages were doing. Granted it was not as big as what
Anders did, but still they had their hand in the cookie jar too (my mage being
one of them).

Beyond that, people are saying “Think of all the innocents killed
in the Chantry.” OK, do you have a list of people who were in the Chantry? As
far as I can tell from the cut scene, there was only a handful of Templars, the
Grand Cleric and another priestess. I did not see the Chantry packed with by
standards and the debris afterward was thrown out to sea and the bits that were
in the city disintegrated into dust before hitting the ground. Anders stated in
the game, he would make sure few innocents as possible were killed; maybe he
had a plan to keep people from going into the Chantry. Maybe people stayed in
their homes and avoided the Chantry. We do not know all the details, so claiming
thousands upon thousands of lives died is pure speculation not fact.

Even IF my character were not in love with him, she would
have not killed him. I believe it is better to live with the consequences of
your actions then slink off into the shadows and have everyone else fix it for you.
 Did Anders make a mistake? In my opinion,
I view it as a means of necessary. Something like this was bound to happen
sooner or later, Anders just made it come sooner than later.

I think the problem is people try to use real life
situations to compare Anders actions too. The problem is two things: One, there
is nothing in real life you can compare his actions too. Secondly trying to use
real life situations on a game is just, well idiotic. Minus well try to compare
and apple and orange while you are at it.

The best thing to do is use all the information in the game
to come to your own conclusion/opinion on the matter because that is what
matters. Furthermore reading “Asunder” is a good idea too. After I was done
reading it, my views on supporting the Mage Rebellion and not killing Anders
and staying with him was the right choice.

I am a role player, so I tend to get inside my character’s
head (so to speak) and choose how I want to build her to ensure I get the best possible
gaming experience. She believes in mage freedom as much as Anders does. She
supports him in destroying the Chantry because it was necessary. It is hard for
her to hate someone when she has the same views as he does and then you add her
being in love with him that just makes it harder for her to hate him.

Killing Anders is not going to make up for what happened nor
is it going to rebuild the Chantry. IF you are looking for someone to point the
finger at, blame the Chantry, The Templars and The Seekers. If they were not
such ****s to the mage community, then no doubt the Kirkwall Rebellion
probably would not have taken place. It is easy to point the finger at the
person who standing in front of you, while the real culprit(s) stand on the
sidelines, laughing, letting that person take the full blame.

#55025
The Librarian

The Librarian
  • Members
  • 41 messages
[quote]Cantina wrote...

No offense to you or to anyone here, but it really grits my
teeth to hear Anders being called a “terrorist.” [/quote]
Well it's not like he blew up a building, kiling people to enforce his own view and politics.

Oh wait.......


 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Beyond that, I shake my head to hear those people who killed him, simply because there pissed at what he
did. [/quote]
Not just that. Anders is way out of his head. He do what he think is right, but so do every terorrist.
He wont stop. He would have continued to bring blood, death, widows, sorrow through Thedas because HE wanted it. He is trying to changed the world after his view based on his own opinions giving no opinions to the rest of the world. And those who isn't with his is against him. That includeds those who simply wants peace.

It might be due to Justice, but Anders is a danger. Had there been an option to put him in jail, I would. But this was not the case. I really think that it is stupid to let a man as out of the wits as Anders to run free and keep bring death.


 [quote]Cantina wrote...  
The way I see things is what Anders did needed to be done,
not exactly the right thing to do but it needed to be done. The Chantry for
over a thousand years has punished mages and used their religion to whip the
populace into fear about the mages. Sure, other Circles outside of Kirkwall
were no were near as bad, but Kirkwall was proof of how bad things can get and
the Chantry does nothing to step in. [/quote]
I am an Athiast. I think that religion is long over due and that we would be much better with out it.
And I really hate what religion has done and is still doing towards homosexuals. And how they want their belife to control the body of a woman who don't even share this belife if she wanted to do an abortion. In many countries, states and societies religion outlaws them. I am very much against that, but that do not mean that I should go and blow up a mosque or a church. 

Right or wrong do not excuse an act of terorrism.

People could have risen with out violoence. As happend many times before.


 [quote]Cantina wrote...  
Elthina was preaching that she does not agree with Meredith’s
methods, yet allowed her to continue to do them. The Grand Cleric was offered
outside help from the Divine to calm the storm before it got worse and told Elthina
to leave and she refused.[/quote]
And because of that Anders murdering her is right? Shame on Elthina for wanting a peaceful solution.

  [quote]Cantina wrote...  
Elthina believed she could settle the dispute with
cookies and tea, but when you have argument that was festering for seven years
then add a thousand years on top of that, peaceful talks are not going to work.[/quote]
Because diplomacy never works and she could obviously see into the future.
I too like most others would want to see the peacful solution. How you can see blowing up a shurch and the people with in to start a war to be the right choice is truly beyond me. 

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Elthina was trying to save the system, because she knows
that without the Templar Order the Chantry would be nothing.[/quote]
This is you assuming. The chantry would still be what it was seeing that it was the religion that the people belived in. Even Anders. The humans of Thedas belive in Andraste and their Maker. The chantry is first of all a place of their religion. And in there lies their power.

Mages and Templars are simply another note or part of it.

  [quote]Cantina wrote... 
She acts as if she is trying to calm the dispute, but taking a step back, she does nothing, all
Elthina was doing was making the situation worse not better. [/quote]
She does to little yes. But she tries to act as a peace maker. To prevent blood runing down the streets.
And it is she who keep Orsino and Meridith at bay throw out the years.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
The Templars and Chantry forced Anders to do what he did.[/quote]
Indeed. The held his cat Ser Pouncealot hostage and threatened to kill him......

Last time I checked every thing was Anders idea and doing. And the chantry never wanted war.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Instead of to finding a solution through peaceful means (which was not going to
happen), he pushed the Templars and Mages in open war. You think it is better
for the mages to sit back, be completely powerless, letting Meradith continue down
her path of crushing the mages while the Chantry looks on and twiddles their thumbs.[/quote]
Changes was unavoidable. But the road could have been another one then war.

How you can see terorrism and a war as the best solotion is truly beyond me. And very disturbing.
Are you American?

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
I do not believe Anders was solely responsible for his actions;
he did after all have a spirit of Justice inside him who no doubt had a larger
hand in the destruction of the Chantry.[/quote]
No doubt? This is you assuming. Or wishing would be more fiting.

  [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Besides if, Anders did not destroy the
Chantry, chances of an open war with the mages and Templars was bound to
happen. Other mages such as the Revolutionist were already pushing for war with
their actions.[/quote]
So... That Anders was the one makes it more right? Dear lord. Fangirlism is delusion on high levels.
His actions will always come down as an act of terorrism to enforce his own view and politic.

  [quote]Cantina wrote... 
People like to point fingers at Anders, but refuse to
acknowledge what other mages were doing. Granted it was not as big as what
Anders did, but still they had their hand in the cookie jar too (my mage being
one of them). [/quote]
I do not defend the actions of other mages, templars or any people who do something wrong.
But it was Anders and not them who blew up the chantry, killing people and starting a bloody war.
And last time I checked this was a thread about Anders and not every single bad person in Thedas.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Beyond that, people are saying “Think of all the innocents killed
in the Chantry.” OK, do you have a list of people who were in the Chantry? As
far as I can tell from the cut scene, there was only a handful of Templars, the
Grand Cleric and another priestess.[/quote]
And they did what exactly to deserve being murderd?
Hey. I'm not a fan of religious people but blowing up a church and those who believe in that religion is wrong. I child could tell that.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
I did not see the Chantry packed with by
standards and the debris afterward was thrown out to sea and the bits that were
in the city disintegrated into dust before hitting the ground. Anders stated in
the game, he would make sure few innocents as possible were killed; maybe he
had a plan to keep people from going into the Chantry. Maybe people stayed in
their homes and avoided the Chantry. We do not know all the details, so claiming
thousands upon thousands of lives died is pure speculation not fact. [/quote]
Those with in was still innocent. At least when it comes down to being murderd in the name of one mans opinions. And with a war ragin on around Thedas due to Anders doing. There will be a count of dead persons both on the mages, templars and the people in between. Regardless to what the belive in.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Even IF my character were not in love with him, she would
have not killed him. I believe it is better to live with the consequences of
your actions then slink off into the shadows and have everyone else fix it for you.[/quote]
Not if it would mean him runing free and continuing what he does.
If sending one to jail wasn't an option what would you do with a serie killer who has every intentions of continuing?
Kill him or let him go free?

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
 Did Anders make a mistake? In my opinion,
I view it as a means of necessary. Something like this was bound to happen
sooner or later, Anders just made it come sooner than later. [/quote]
Terorrism a means of necessary? You really do have a very disturbing view on things.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
I think the problem is people try to use real life
situations to compare Anders actions too. The problem is two things: One, there
is nothing in real life you can compare his actions too. Secondly trying to use
real life situations on a game is just, well idiotic. Minus well try to compare
and apple and orange while you are at it. [/quote]
Ah yes. Terorrism and killing people are good things when it isn't in real life.....
One sees and know the line between a game and reality. But meanings stand true in both.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
I am a role player, so I tend to get inside my character’s
head (so to speak) and choose how I want to build her to ensure I get the best possible
gaming experience. She believes in mage freedom as much as Anders does. She
supports him in destroying the Chantry because it was necessary. It is hard for
her to hate someone when she has the same views as he does and then you add her
being in love with him that just makes it harder for her to hate him. [/quote]
All my characters no matter whom the romanced have supported the mages. But supporting mages do not mean that they support terorrism and killing innocent. 

Suporting Anders actions are not suporting the mages. That is only suporting fanatic terorrism or an extreme personal view.

 [quote]Cantina wrote... 
Killing Anders is not going to make up for what happened nor
is it going to rebuild the Chantry. IF you are looking for someone to point the
finger at, blame the Chantry, The Templars and The Seekers.[/quote]
Indeed. I shall blame them for blowing up themselves.

What Anders did was an act solemly based on his own view. The mages around Thedas are neither terorrists nor posseds like Anders. They do not agree with his actions. Only deluded and extreme fanatics do.

Modifié par The Librarian, 08 avril 2012 - 06:47 .