Kawamura wrote...
Anders' is the possessive. Anders's is a contraction of "Anders is".
I'm pretty certain of that.
No, you're getting confused with the rule for "its" and "it's". "It's" is always a contraction of "it is," while "its" is the possessive form.
Names don't follow the same rule, though. There is no formally-correct way to contract "Anders is," and if you're trying to capture the way a person can slur those words while speaking, you'd write "Anders 's" (as in, "Sorry, can't talk, Anders 's goin' ta blow up th' Chantry now, 'n I gotta get anuther pint b'fore the torch-wieldin' mobs storm the Hanged Man.")
The rule for the possessive apostrophe, when applied to proper names ending in S, used to be that you had to add the additional S afterwards unless the name was a classical or Biblical one. So: it's Jesus' loincloth, and Socrates' toga, but it's Anders's weird gray bib.
This is confusing and sometimes awkward, so it's becoming increasingly acceptable to leave off the extra S in all cases. The Chicago Manual of Style allows this as "an alternative practice." I personally leave off the extra S in all cases except the very most formal. So, on your wedding invitations or your college admissions essays, you'll want to talk about the way Anders's lean, scarred frame shuddered under Fenris's touch.
In less formal contexts you can just inform everyone that it was Anders'
And that's the rule.
Modifié par Siduri, 31 mars 2011 - 08:49 .





Retour en haut






