Sarah1281 wrote...
In Kirkwall, I really can't think of any decisions you make that hold that kind of weight.
That is simply not true, and you know it! You even said so yourself: the Qunari will have a different point of view of you, and they're dangerous people. So will the mages, and so will the templars and general public. How are these not things of weight? If you're going to infer importance of choices in DA:O, you should be fair and infer the same in DA2. If you don't need an epilogue to tell you consequences, such as will the Dalish, why would you need one for your Templar/Mage decisions to hold weight? I found the decision in the Dalish quest to be completely pointless. It just came down to whether I wanted to kill one for the sake of many, or a whole tribe, or whatever. So far, the only consequence I saw was who fought for you in the end battle, not the hate of all elves or werewolves found me in the night for revenge or anything.
DA2's "your actions matter" are more internal, perhaps, than external. You see what your actions have done over the coarse of the game. Something DA:O lacks a lot of. It depended on the epilogue in a way.
The thing about the ending of DA2 is that you can't stay neutral. That's not why Cassandra is interogating Varric, and that's not an interesting story either. You're important to the world because you did one thing or another, and didn't just sit at home drinking tea. If you help the Templars, the people love you and make you Viscount. If you help the Mages, you're a fugitive. There's no tea-drinker achievement. xD
Modifié par maselphie, 17 mars 2011 - 10:34 .