So, in one case, he retains a little more sanity because he and Justice want similar things and in the other case, he is torn apart because he doesn't know what he wants anymore.
Modifié par YamiSnuffles, 18 mars 2011 - 12:07 .
Modifié par YamiSnuffles, 18 mars 2011 - 12:07 .
Galagraphia wrote...
I think merging with Justice further may be a good thing. When the border between them will disappear there will be also no internal conflict. Anders will become something like Flemeth, if we assume that she was once an abomination as a legend says. And Flemeth seems a pretty solid personality.
YamiSnuffles wrote...
I just flat out disagree that Anders is unaware of what's happening if you take the friendship path. No matter which way you go, he mentions numerous times how much Vengeance/Justice has taken over who he is. It's just, one way, he has his lover supporting his struggle to free the mages of Thedas, and the other way, he's torn apart because he wants one thing but the person he loves doesn't support him in that.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 mars 2011 - 12:16 .
catabuca wrote...
you could certainly argue that it's gone too far now for Anders to try to be separated from Justice, and if it did happen a new essential part of Anders would be lost. There would be repercussions for his personality and sense of self if he was to suddenly be without this part of him that urged him forward in his cause.
Ryzaki wrote...
YamiSnuffles wrote...
I just flat out disagree that Anders is unaware of what's happening if you take the friendship path. No matter which way you go, he mentions numerous times how much Vengeance/Justice has taken over who he is. It's just, one way, he has his lover supporting his struggle to free the mages of Thedas, and the other way, he's torn apart because he wants one thing but the person he loves doesn't support him in that.
Well everyone isn't going to agree. To me the friendship path was filled with much naivity on Anders part. In regards to mage freedoms and the spirit within.
I saw my rival path trying to tell Anders that freedom for mages just wouldn't work in theory the way he was proposing. Anders just plain refuses to compromise (a result of Justice's hold on him). That's not healthy. No one will win that way.
His "freedom" would end up causing more harm for the mages than the Circles ever did.
Sometimes we have to reign people in when they're doing things that are self destructive. Not supporting a lover can sometimes be better for them.
Modifié par YamiSnuffles, 18 mars 2011 - 12:19 .
Ryzaki wrote...
Well everyone isn't going to agree. To me the friendship path was filled with much naivity on Anders part. In regards to mage freedoms and the spirit within.
I saw my rival path trying to tell Anders that freedom for mages just wouldn't work in theory the way he was proposing. Anders just plain refuses to compromise (a result of Justice's hold on him). That's not healthy. No one will win that way.
His "freedom" would end up causing more harm for the mages than the Circles ever did.
Sometimes we have to reign people in when they're doing things that are self destructive. Not supporting a lover can sometimes be better for them.
Doesn't help that I think the blowing up the Chantry was mainly Justice's idea. Yes of course the best way to get Justice is to get a large group of people to think your terrorists. That'll go over swimmingly.![]()
As for sanity: Anders didn't seem insane to me on the rivalrymance path. Just very tormented and losing himself to Justice while being aware of it.
YamiSnuffles wrote...
I just flat out disagree that Anders is unaware of what's happening if you take the friendship path. No matter which way you go, he mentions numerous times how much Vengeance/Justice has taken over who he is. It's just, one way, he has his lover supporting his struggle to free the mages of Thedas, and the other way, he's torn apart because he wants one thing but the person he loves doesn't support him in that.
So, in one case, he retains a little more sanity because he and Justice want similar things and in the other case, he is torn apart because he doesn't know what he wants anymore.
Well everyone isn't going to agree. To me the friendship path was filled with much naivity on Anders part. In regards to mage freedoms and the spirit within.
YamiSnuffles wrote...
I agree that it's good to disagree with a lover if they're doing something destructive. I guess it just comes down to how you feel about what Anders is doing. Other than blowing up the Chantry, I agreed with just about everything he was doing. That didn't stop my Hawke from reigning him in when he went too far. It's not like in the friendship path you have to encourage everything he does.'
I also don't think he was being naive. He knew his path would mean a lot of mages would die (and would probably mean he would die) but he thought it was worth it. I think it would have been more naive of him if he thought change would be easy. He never does.
And I don't think that somehow he magically retains more of himself in the friendship path. I fully get that he gets eaten up either way. I would still argue he seems a little more sane when he's not blacking out all the time and fighting with himself.
Anyway, everyone is entitled to their opinions. I can see where people are coming from with the rivalmance, I just happen to not agree.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 mars 2011 - 12:33 .
catabuca wrote...
I think I see the issue here: it's all down to whether you believe Anders was right to blow up the Chantry or not. I support him in that, something that no doubt clouds my view of whether being a friend to him or not was the best thing to do. You don't support him in it, so for you being a rival makes more sense. If I didn't believe what he did was right, I would probably want to make him question his actions too, and would think getting him to see how Justice was ruining him would be a good thing. However, I do believe it was a necessary move, so having him tear himself apart seems more cruel than simply being there offering what support I can. Your approach is equally as valid, it just requires a different interpretation of Anders' actions.
jab19782010 wrote...
I have to agree with you. This morning when I woke up and watched the rivarly romance videos I kind of thought my supporting him in my friendship path made him worse. And at first I felt bad about it. But now that I have had some time to think about it I think my friendship path is better for him. Even in the codex it says my Hawke is the only thing keeping him sane. With the rivarly path he has Justice, oppression of the Mages, AND a lover who is against him to deal with. Even if it makes him worse, adding more fuel to the fire to have my support, at least he can look at my female Hawke and know she is loving him...ALL of him...taking the good and the bad.
catabuca wrote...
I think I see the issue here: it's all down to whether you believe Anders was right to blow up the Chantry or not. I support him in that, something that no doubt clouds my view of whether being a friend to him or not was the best thing to do. You don't support him in it, so for you being a rival makes more sense. If I didn't believe what he did was right, I would probably want to make him question his actions too, and would think getting him to see how Justice was ruining him would be a good thing. However, I do believe it was a necessary move, so having him tear himself apart seems more cruel than simply being there offering what support I can. Your approach is equally as valid, it just requires a different interpretation of Anders' actions.
Ryzaki wrote...
It is destructive. He turned the Chantry a powerful force completely against the mages. That is far more than *his* life he is screwing with. He has endangered and killed countless lives because of his decision. He suffers from "I know better than you." syndrome. He's going to make mages free whether they agree with it or not. That's not noble.
Modifié par RinjiRenee, 18 mars 2011 - 01:22 .
RinjiRenee wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
It is destructive. He turned the Chantry a powerful force completely against the mages. That is far more than *his* life he is screwing with. He has endangered and killed countless lives because of his decision. He suffers from "I know better than you." syndrome. He's going to make mages free whether they agree with it or not. That's not noble.
Actually, at least the Seekers are ... "seeking" a more peaceful resolution with the mages, as evident from the epilogue. The Templars are the ones who have betrayed the Chantry and are hunting the mages. I imagine the Divine, who might have considered an Exiled March, is now quite afraid of making a move because ALL the Circles have rebelled. Hawke was the one person they thought could talk them down, but unfortunately, he/she is gone, just like the Warden.
Tevinter must be quite pleased, though...
After his attack on Ella, Anders lost interest in the case of mage revolution. Convinced he
was no better than an abomination, Anders was determined to gain mastery over he spirit inside
him...or die trying. It is increasingly apparent that he is losing this struggle. Prone to wild moodswings between deep melancholy and manic determination, Anders has again taken up the mantle of mage freedom--though it is unclear whether this decision came from Anders or Justice.
Garrett's status as Champion has protected Anders from the attentions of the templars, despite his increasing notoriety. Though they have lived openly together for some time, Anders remains uncomfortable in the spotlight Garrett's prescence has cast him into. In private, though, he remains a tender and devoted lover; he has repeatedly declared that Garrett is the only reason he's retained any sanity at all.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 mars 2011 - 12:46 .
Galagraphia wrote...
The dalish keeper said an interesting thing about the possession: even if you free a mage from a demon, his soul will be damaged, scarred. He will never be the same again, an easy prey to spirits. So, after her words I just don't see the possibility of separating Anders and Justice. They are one, as Anders keeps saying, even after you ask him if the boom was Justice's idea. I don't think that merging means Justice will take over completely. Justice will gain from that union too. The first thing he got from Anders was anger, but Anders is so much more than just anger! I'm sure if given time Justice will see other sides of being mortal. But Hawke will have to keep him from seeing unjust things long enough to open his eyes to that. Well, that is my dream of their future, sort of. I don't know if it's possible, but in the end Anders was full of hope and looked happy.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 mars 2011 - 12:54 .
Modifié par YamiSnuffles, 18 mars 2011 - 01:03 .
YamiSnuffles wrote...
Considering that both paths have him stated as being "determined to gain mastery over the spirit inside him... or die trying" I continue not to see the argument that Anders is somehow oblivious to what Vengeance is doing to him in the friendship route. And he is stated as being at least a little sane only because of Hawke both ways. So yes, as I said, I think both are valid depending on how you feel about Anders' cause.
Anyhoo, I think we can all agree something must be done about Justice. What that something is, I honestly can't decide.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 mars 2011 - 01:14 .
Galagraphia wrote...
@Ryzaki, I think their merging is more complicated. I can see that they are becoming one personality. Mostly because I was playing Awakening just before I got DAII and when I started DAII I realised that Anders actually talks like Justice did in Awakening. But at the same time they exist in two dimensions: Thedas and Fade. Irving and Morrigan in Origins said that Connor didn't have a demon inside of him, demon was controlling him from the Fade. Justice in DAII, when you go to Fade, says that he hasn't been in the Fade for quite some time and in Awakening he said that he missed the Fade too. Which means he exists in physical world. Still, when Justice assumes direct control, he sort of opens a portal to the Fade, according to Karl. And Merrill says that Fade is like a different kingdom. So, maybe there is a Fade part of Justice, like body in this world, that part remains in the Fade but can be brought to this world through a tear Justice creates when Anders' eyes glow. The part of the Fade Karl felt. Well then, if they will continue merging, Justice may eventually lose that connection with his Fade "body" and Anders' blackouts will stop. Justice will completely become a part of Anders.
Gosh, me and my crazy theories.
catabuca wrote...
@Nivilant -- the long posts are the best ;-)
catabuca: proud member of the wall-of-text club.
Galagraphia wrote...
@Ryzaki, I think their merging is more complicated. I can see that they are becoming one personality. Mostly because I was playing Awakening just before I got DAII and when I started DAII I realised that Anders actually talks like Justice did in Awakening. But at the same time they exist in two dimensions: Thedas and Fade. Irving and Morrigan in Origins said that Connor didn't have a demon inside of him, demon was controlling him from the Fade. Justice in DAII, when you go to Fade, says that he hasn't been in the Fade for quite some time and in Awakening he said that he missed the Fade too. Which means he exists in physical world. Still, when Justice assumes direct control, he sort of opens a portal to the Fade, according to Karl. And Merrill says that Fade is like a different kingdom. So, maybe there is a Fade part of Justice, like body in this world, that part remains in the Fade but can be brought to this world through a tear Justice creates when Anders' eyes glow. The part of the Fade Karl felt. Well then, if they will continue merging, Justice may eventually lose that connection with his Fade "body" and Anders' blackouts will stop. Justice will completely become a part of Anders.
Gosh, me and my crazy theories.