cmessaz wrote...
Nivilant wrote...
It's only if you make the effort that you understand.
And from what I've seen, it's another case of them not trying to see or make effort. They either read a spoiler for DA2 before release and decided Anders was an ass from that, or romanced Fenris the first playthrough and didn't get close to Anders, which I suppose could make you dislike him. I think I'm kinda this way with Fenris...his mage stuff rubbed me the wrong way. But I really do need to romance him before I give my honest opinion. IF I can ever tear myself away from Anders and his hot kiss...
Ah. This is where my opinion starts losing credit, because I've never been able to finish a romance with Fenris. I tried, I really did, but there's just something about him that gets me irritated every time. It's not the mage thing. I understand his viewpoint, I truly do. It's the way everything seems to be about him.
If you try to make him see reason about his revenge thing he snits at you. "Yes, that's it, why can't I grasp something so simple?" That's not snark to me, it's just rude. She's trying to help you, you twit.
When he comforts you about your mother, it's his problems again. Anders is just... so much softer and sweeter than Fenris. I think Fenris is the nice 'bad boy' romance girls fantasize about (or so people seem to think). Nice to dream of, horrible to live through. I mean, he ups and leaves you at one point. And yes, I know Anders does that awful emotional blackmail thing and it did tick me off a little bit, but at the same time he so clearly loves Hawke that the issue to me seems pretty minor.
Plus, he doesn't harp on about Templars as much as Fenris harps about mages. Which is interesting given the similarities and differences.
Fenris and Anders both are on the run from someone or something. Fenris chose his 'gift' from what his sister says. Anders was born with it. Fenris is hunted for a choice, whereas Anders is hunted for existing and trying to be free. Anders is criticised for blowing the chantry up, but Fenris quite clearly thinks all mages should be leashed at the best and made tranquil at the worst. Which is essentially supporting something worse than death. Yet he stirs up nowhere near as much controversy. It boggles the mind.
I think the impact is there because we see it. If it had been heard about, not seen, it wouldn't have as much punch.
And yes, the Warden can be an utter lunatic.