Pseudocognition wrote...
Also, I agree re: death penalty. Medieval society etc. And I think the best thing for the peace of mind of the majority is to shank Anders. I doubt anyone on the street cares about how much he suffers or could suffer emotionally to live in the s***storm he starts.
I like the poetic justice angle for the sake of a story and holding on to precious plot threads but if it was real life I'd kill him.
Something I'm really curious about is how much the citizens of Kirkwall are going to know about what happened. Orsino, Meredith and the Grand Cleric are dead and there's no sitting viscount, so that's four authorities unable to give information or provide any kind of support in the following weeks.
I haven't sided with the templars yet, but in pro-mage runs most of the surviving Circle mages probably fled for their lives in the chaos to follow Orsino's last instruction of spreading word. Judging by the scene at Meredith's "corpse" there are still plenty of templars left with only Cullen to lead them, and the templars seemed willing to let our characters get the hell out of town if we needed to.
Will the populace blame the templars for what happened, instead of Anders? It would be obvious that something went wrong at the Circle, so would they believe that either it's the mages' fault for being mages, or the templars' fault for being incompetent? How many regular people in Kirkwall
know Anders, aside from the refugees? The Champion of Kirkwall was openly living with him in romances: would that count in his favour? And how many refugees would believe that their healer caused the explosion?
I really want to know what kind of stories are spreading through Kirkwall and the Free Marches a week, a
month later, and who steps up to take charge if Hawke doesn't become viscount. Cullen? He was the only person we were introduced to that seems to have any pull. We never got to know any of the actual nobles, did we?