DeaHamlet wrote...
Kawamura wrote...
What would be so bad?
I mean. I dunno. It just sounds -- tranquil. Calm.
It wouldn't work like they show it, mind, since so much of what humans are is our emotions and we have little inthe way of "rational" thought. But the idea is nice. Going through life, level, being always still on the inside.
As a person for whom most of the fun in life is due to the fact that you feel and are passionate... the lack of dreams and feeling is worse than death to me.
I don't think the calm is worth the loss of dreams and feelings. But then again, I already stipulated that I see most of the beauty in life because of dreams and feelings... from which one draws creativity. You cannot be really creative as tranquil. Even the major writer of DA:2 (Gaidan or somesuch?!?!) admitted as much.
The loss of creativity would be a problem, I admit. Science and medicine require creativity, because you can't just go through things using algorithim; you'd kill all your patients that way, you'd never stumble upon an accidental "oh, hey, why don't I try that?"
And, like I said, it doesn't really make sense that a Tranquil person would actually function without emotions. A lack of emotions seems like it wouldn't work out, based on what we're learning about people.
But the way it's described doesn't sound all that bad. I'm not really a "big on feelings" person, I guess. Extreme feelings are uncomfortable to me, even the happy ones.