Warrior - Is anything but a two-hand build worth it anymore?
#1
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 11:18
So this leads me to my question to people who've played further in the game than I have.
Is it really worth building a sword/board warrior (since they got rid of dual-wield option entirely for warriors) and since you have Aveline as a tank that a PC can't really beat (just by looking at her skills at least)?
#2
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 11:55
THIS is what pisses me off.CgSquall wrote...
Is it really worth building a sword/board warrior (since they got rid of dual-wield option entirely for warriors) and since you have Aveline as a tank that a PC can't really beat (just by looking at her skills at least)?
How they push NPC tank in my face. First Alistair, now her.
And If I want to be tank myself(Removing said character from the group), I'm kind of loosing essential plot character.
While respeccing them to be DPS is not an option(Several talents are in "tank spec" already)...
Come on!
Also, I'm no sexist, but I just feel uneasy forcing a woman to take beating while I backstab enemies with my two hander.
P.S. I think the "holy trinity"(Tank + Healer + Dps) should be changed already. Way too restrictive, overplayed and bland. But, I'm no game designer...
Modifié par xDSx, 08 mars 2011 - 11:56 .
#3
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 11:56
Besides, having two tanks with different builds, one evasion based and another mitigation based could work if you manage to divert the attention of lieutenants and bosses, The DPS of the S&B isn't as almighty as the Two-Handed Warrior when swarmed, but as a future zweihander myself, I dread the notion of having to tank a boss.
S&B plays it safe, you shouldn't be killing your party memebers as often, you can allow yourself to carry a melee rogue... There's more room for variety, while the 2H is pretty much a Berserker, a crazy dude swinging his sword and putting everyone at risk.
I even mentioned somewhere in General Discussion something about the Berserk manga. If anyone's been keeping up with it, one should understand the mention.
#4
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 12:23
I could post a really long list of why's and such...but instead I'll just say one thing... why are there so many unique/amazing one-handed weapons if it is such a horrible choice to go sword/shield in DA2?
#5
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 01:56
#6
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 04:31
#7
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 05:00
cry more dude, like mentioned above, play your warrior how you want, having 2 different tanks with different specialties is cool. play 2h and let the girl do it all, im sure there will be another option later.
either way tho, relax!
#8
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:17
#9
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:19
#10
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 11:34
#11
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 11:43
I personally love S&B protection/tank type warrior roles. After looking over Aveline's skill trees it was pretty disheartening. Can Hawke even gain access to the Guardian skills?
This has actually halted my playing of the game for the moment. I have actually started a new game twice now, once as a shield war and once as a two-hander. It's not that I dislike 2handers, but I enjoy S&B more, and it's kindof like what is the point if Aveline is so preset and "in-your-face" about being a tank?
#12
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 03:05
I love sword/board...but Aveline just...sort of ruins it?
#13
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 03:30
They removed dual wield talents from Warriors? Are you serious? That was my favourite style in Origins and Awakening.
The rogue animations are pretty annoying to me too after playing the Demo, and hearing I'd have to be a rogue to be able to dual wield makes me angry.
Well that's just bloody brilliant
Ugh.
#14
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 04:37
Wissenschaft wrote...
An S&S warrior can still be great using upgrades to Stagger enemies and various abilities to knockdown enemies. They don't just tank, they disrupt the enemy. Add in Bravery to help them fight mass hordes and let them switch to shield defense when its time do tank a boss.
A Two-Handed Warrior can also stagger...with ease. On top of that, the Blood Dragon armor + Razer combo is stupidly powerful through Act 1, and I don't use Aveline -- there's no point. This is playing on Hard though. I won't be using a Two-Handed build in Nightmare until they patch the stupidity out (most likely never).
#15
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 05:00
#16
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 05:24
#17
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 08:29
#18
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 09:14
#19
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 03:02
#20
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 03:08
#21
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 04:24
Frigus wrote...
If you dislike Aveline don't take her with you. Tank yourself or have Fenris, Carver or Merrill do it. The point of have a party of adventurers is to cover each others' weaknesses.
This.
Not sure about Nightmare, but on normal or hard there's absolutely no requirement to have a second tank. If you're a warrior and want to tank then do it.
#22
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 04:37
I am not sure what the problem is here though. You get Aveline early and unlike Alistair who was built as an offensive S&B early on Aveline actually is built more like a tank. Like Alistair, she is easy to spec out as an effective tank. I do not see why a PC would make a better tank, since she comes in so early. If you buy tomes heavily and tomes can only be used by you then maybe you make a slightly better tank in the late game.
Actually, in origins it was not so much Alistair was already a tank that was annoying. It was Loghain taking his place if you let him live. The guy was a poor tank build with no way to respec and no time to level up.
#23
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 06:15
#24
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 06:20
#25
Posté 09 mars 2011 - 08:11
Modifié par jweath, 09 mars 2011 - 08:23 .





Retour en haut







