Aller au contenu

Photo

If you are running at 50+ fps on high or very high, please explain


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1 réponse à ce sujet

#1
Randomjob

Randomjob
  • Members
  • 244 messages
Just curious as to which options you selected and what your computer rig is.

Forme I have an i7 950 @ 3.8ghz, 6gigs 1600mhz ram, and a GTX 460 1gb, on Windows 7 64-bit.   I have the beta nvidia driver installed, and I have the hi-res texture pack installed and checked on in the options.  I am using the DX11 rendered, which my card supports.

I am running at 1920x1080 (as that's the native res of my monitor).

So on medium detail, with full AA and ansiotropic, I get silky smooth 60fps. On high detail, AA and ansio off completely, and none of the detail boxes checked, I get around 40fps.  (If I check any boxes or put any AA on,
the FPS goes below 30...unplayable imo). On very high detail, even with nothing else on I get around 15-20 fps.


Suffice it to say, I'm disappointed.  My rig can handle every other game in existence at the moment at 60 fps with the 1920x1080 resolution (except Metro 2033), and many games have far better graphics.  Anyone running
it well?


If you are getting 50+ fps on high detail or very high detail, please post your

-processor
-ram
-vid card
-windows version
-newest/beta video driver installed?
-high res texture pack?
-resolution
-All the options you have checked

Modifié par Randomjob, 08 mars 2011 - 02:44 .


#2
Ninjaman09

Ninjaman09
  • Members
  • 5 messages
Got an i7 920@ 3.3ghz, 6 gigs of 1600 ram, and a GTX 570 on Windows 7 64-bit. Same frame rate issues as you. Also character animations appear extremely jerky and strange independently from the frame rate. On DX9 mode everything runs smooth as butter of course, but I don't see why it runs so slowly on DX11, especially when I cannot see any particular difference in the graphics.

I think I have the high-res texture pack installed, but it's hard to tell because the installer doesn't work for Steam users. Had to use a workaround someone posted in another thread here. Again I'm not seeing a difference between DX11 and DX9 mode quality-wise aside from the vastly improved frame rates in DX9 mode.

Worth noting I have not even left the starting area, just playing around with the video options to no avail. I'm assuming the frame rate problems would persist even beyond this area, but even trying to find out would be tough since it's almost unplayable.