Hesitant to buy ME3 after ME2 & DA2?
#1
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:19
#2
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:21
#3
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:30
DA2 is the first ever Bioware game that I won't be preordering or buying on day 1, and will rather wait for the inevitable ultimate edition in a couple of years.
Haven't decided on ME3 yet.
For me, Bioware are no longer the kings of the RPG.
#4
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:30
Not sure about DA2 and DA1. DA2 seems pretty decent so far. I liked Gamespot's review because they clearly explained their biases. I don't share those biases so I might grade the little game higher in the end. We'll see. IGN also had a good review where they raved about the new mechanics being awesome but had the same complaints a GS about the more limited, linear story.
But ME2 and DA2 are very different games with different mechanics and different storytelling. I'm not really sure how you could compare the two.
#5
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:37
#6
Guest_SpaceDesperado_*
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:48
Guest_SpaceDesperado_*
The Citadel in the original game was the best setting/planet in any bioware game for me. The environment, characters, side-quests, and the general gain of knowledge you get from that planet was truly amasing. Also add to the fact that during your journey, re-visiting the planet gained you more quests and activitie to do. Now think of the citadel in Mass Effect 2... Thank god for Skyrim, atleast those developers realised there mistakes from oblivion and are trying to be more unique, immersive, and full of new RPG ideas and features. It seems like their seeking influence from their fan-favourite game Morrowind. However, Bioware now has no franchise which they can consider an actual, credible rpg game instead of "action-rpg".
#7
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:49
Also, wheras you've never played ME2 more than once, ME2 is one of the few games I've played multiple times. Usually I beat a game and shelf it, Bioware's other games being the usual exceptions.
Modifié par Valadras21, 08 mars 2011 - 06:50 .
#8
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:51
I do have an issue with DA2 compared to DA:O, though.
I seriously hope DA2 is not a sign of times to come from Bioware cause that isn't something I would want to incur on my hopes for ME3.
#9
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:55
I like the game play changes. I think they are great. I have no doubt that the graphics, music setting is going to be fantastic. I'm concerned about story continuity. so I'm going into a state of mind where role playing is replaced by meta gaming and meta gaming doesn't have the same passion behind it, that role playing does. and that passion for the game is the driving force behind "must have now"
#10
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:58
It sounds like you're the former to me, and if that's the case then of course RPG games being stripped down in their sequels is going to upset you. Theres nothing wrong with that, but you need to understand that you are looking at it primarily from the perspective of a disappointed RPG player.
To the wider gaming public, theres no contest between ME1 and ME2. ME2 is the stronger game every day of the week, and twice on Sundays. The reviews bear this out, and so do the sales figures.
In a way its sad, yes, because it has been somewhat mainstreamed. However the lore that you said you loved is still intact and will always remain at the series' core. When considering ME3, don;t think of it as an RPG anymore if you don't want to be disappointed. There will still be some RPG elements of course, but if you went into the experience of ME3 looking forwards rather than back to ME1 then you would enjoy it 10x more I'm confident of that.
#11
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:58
ME2 was really more about the combat.
I have my doubts about thier biggest project to date because of this.
Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...
ME2 >>> ME1. Would preorder ME3 now if I could.
Only in game play. The holes and logic inconsistancies in the story really show BW is either getting lazy or cheap on hiring good writers.
Modifié par Mynoot, 08 mars 2011 - 07:00 .
#12
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 06:58
ME1 is a game made by geniuses.
ME2 is a poor attempt at a ripoff of ME1 made by whoever made gears of war.
i preordered ME2 with great anticipation. which was warranted.
ill rent ME3 on some random weekend. which breaks my god damned heart. it really does.
Modifié par The Spamming Troll, 08 mars 2011 - 07:02 .
#13
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:01
#14
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:02
The games are great; I'm just worried about quality control, and this developer's new inability to be honest about it.
#15
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:03
Same goes with movies, really. Take, for example, Dr. Zhivago--excellent film with a beautiful score and spectacular acting. It's very dramatic and moving, and has several underlying messages that really make you think. Problem is, it's like four hours long with all sorts of needless blathering. It heaps on the drama so much that it bogs down the story, and not once is there a "cool" or "funny" part to cheer up the audience.
Yes, it's a classic example of the epic genre in filmmaking, a genre that has all but died out and appeals to a very niche audience. But it's an absolute bore and difficult to watch. I got zero enjoyment out of it, even though I could appreciate it artistically. Same goes with Gettysburg and Lawrence of Arabia. Well, okay, Gettysburg was fun to watch and made me cry, but I can't sit through the thing more than once every couple years.
Movies like Mrs. Doubtfire and Signs? I can watch those over and over. Why? Because they're short, have endearing characters, aren't too incredibly complicated, and have uplifting endings.
Art is important, but I watch movies and play video games to be entertained. Lightening up on the more classical elements may make you feel like a game is less intelligent, but they make it less of a chore to play and add to replay value.
Your mileage may vary.
Modifié par AdmiralCheez, 08 mars 2011 - 07:19 .
#16
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:04
#17
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:08
Modifié par Mesina2, 08 mars 2011 - 07:40 .
#18
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:11
#19
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:12
#20
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:12
#21
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:13
The storywriting is my only concern with ME3.
#22
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:16
They are two different games worked on by two different teams.
Just because one is a disappointment (and I'm not saying DA2 is, I'm just playing Devil's Advocate) doesn't mean the other is.
For example. lets say at a certain college both the men and women's basketball team are expected to go far into the post-season. Now lets say that the women's team is a let down and doesn't make it to the tourney. Does that mean the men will be a let down too? Of course not. They may be connected by name and association, but, in the end, they are two separate entities.
As for the other argument. I thought that ME2 was better than ME1, but if you smushed together ME1's story with ME2's gameplay, I would be a very happy boy.
#23
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:19
Mynoot wrote...
Bioware's story telling has gone done more than a notch. ME1 was good, not as good as Baldur's Gate or DA:O, but certainly good for this particular franchise.
ME2 was really more about the combat.
I have my doubts about thier biggest project to date because of this.Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...
ME2 >>> ME1. Would preorder ME3 now if I could.
Only in game play. The holes and logic inconsistancies in the story really show BW is either getting lazy or cheap on hiring good writers.
I could not disagree more profoundedly. Overall, the writing in ME2 easily outshone ME1. The only area ME1 beat ME2 was in the main mission story telling and most of tthe problem there was editting and mission design, not writing.
#24
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:20
#25
Posté 08 mars 2011 - 07:22
On the other hand, it's nice to hear that companion chatter was done well in Da2, which makes me hopeful that we'll see more of it in ME3.





Retour en haut





