Twaddlefish wrote...
Lehanna wrote...
Ten to one the user reviews are RPG Codex trolls who should have been put out to pasture when Troika closed.
What, you mean they prefer their games buggy and unfinished? I'm looking at you, Bloodlines.
Garlant wrote...
People want this game to be bad, I've no idea why, I guess they built it up so much in their heads over the past few years and at some point they decided they'd have more fun tearing it down for not being to the ridiculous standards they built up in expectation.
Honestly, get the game and play it yourself. For me its had a good start, the only part thats bothered me in the slighest is that I've not got to a part in the story yet where I'm absolutely enthralled to continue playing. But I'm hoping that'll come as I get further into the main quest
DonniexxDarko wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
bioware i bought all of your RPG's since BG2 to ME2, and after all the love i gave you this is what I get in return? do you hate us PC gamers?
Is not just PC gamers that are disappointed with this - you think all console gamers love spamming 'a' and think that's a brilliant 'RPG' experience?
Why are bioware heading in this direction, of taking out features, masquerading it as "streamlining" then releasing it as a "fully improved" sequel?
It goes against the very gaming nature of what sequels entail - they are supposed to get richer in features and gameplay, not dumbed down by every passing game.
From a very disappointed console gamer.
RJPOGI wrote...
DonniexxDarko wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
bioware i bought all of your RPG's since BG2 to ME2, and after all the love i gave you this is what I get in return? do you hate us PC gamers?
Is not just PC gamers that are disappointed with this - you think all console gamers love spamming 'a' and think that's a brilliant 'RPG' experience?
Why are bioware heading in this direction, of taking out features, masquerading it as "streamlining" then releasing it as a "fully improved" sequel?
It goes against the very gaming nature of what sequels entail - they are supposed to get richer in features and gameplay, not dumbed down by every passing game.
From a very disappointed console gamer.
im talking about bad controls, bad UI, nerfed camera on the PC side. good to hear more console players also not liking the game though
brunomalta wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
DonniexxDarko wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
bioware i bought all of your RPG's since BG2 to ME2, and after all the love i gave you this is what I get in return? do you hate us PC gamers?
Is not just PC gamers that are disappointed with this - you think all console gamers love spamming 'a' and think that's a brilliant 'RPG' experience?
Why are bioware heading in this direction, of taking out features, masquerading it as "streamlining" then releasing it as a "fully improved" sequel?
It goes against the very gaming nature of what sequels entail - they are supposed to get richer in features and gameplay, not dumbed down by every passing game.
From a very disappointed console gamer.
im talking about bad controls, bad UI, nerfed camera on the PC side. good to hear more console players also not liking the game though
Why is good? You like to see other people fail is that it? You like to see people loosing their jobs because a manager or director mande a bad call?
The game is what it is. Deal with it and stop rooting for everyone to have the same opinion as yours. opinions are like ****s, everyone has one.
RJPOGI wrote...
brunomalta wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
DonniexxDarko wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
bioware i bought all of your RPG's since BG2 to ME2, and after all the love i gave you this is what I get in return? do you hate us PC gamers?
Is not just PC gamers that are disappointed with this - you think all console gamers love spamming 'a' and think that's a brilliant 'RPG' experience?
Why are bioware heading in this direction, of taking out features, masquerading it as "streamlining" then releasing it as a "fully improved" sequel?
It goes against the very gaming nature of what sequels entail - they are supposed to get richer in features and gameplay, not dumbed down by every passing game.
From a very disappointed console gamer.
im talking about bad controls, bad UI, nerfed camera on the PC side. good to hear more console players also not liking the game though
Why is good? You like to see other people fail is that it? You like to see people loosing their jobs because a manager or director mande a bad call?
The game is what it is. Deal with it and stop rooting for everyone to have the same opinion as yours. opinions are like ****s, everyone has one.
what i meant was it's good to hear that even console players are not having a great time with the game compared with most PC gamers not liking the game, due to the fact the game was "dumbed down" technically. lol u mad? what's with the cursing? are you trying to prove something with that? you're not gonna win arguements with that my friend
brunomalta wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
DonniexxDarko wrote...
RJPOGI wrote...
bioware i bought all of your RPG's since BG2 to ME2, and after all the love i gave you this is what I get in return? do you hate us PC gamers?
Is not just PC gamers that are disappointed with this - you think all console gamers love spamming 'a' and think that's a brilliant 'RPG' experience?
Why are bioware heading in this direction, of taking out features, masquerading it as "streamlining" then releasing it as a "fully improved" sequel?
It goes against the very gaming nature of what sequels entail - they are supposed to get richer in features and gameplay, not dumbed down by every passing game.
From a very disappointed console gamer.
im talking about bad controls, bad UI, nerfed camera on the PC side. good to hear more console players also not liking the game though
Why is good? You like to see other people fail is that it? You like to see people loosing their jobs because a manager or director mande a bad call?
The game is what it is. Deal with it and stop rooting for everyone to have the same opinion as yours. opinions are like ****s, everyone has one.
Modifié par RJPOGI, 09 mars 2011 - 02:44 .
Miths wrote...
What kind of nonsense is that? You aren't seriously quoting the user review average as the Metacritic score, are you?
Guest_simfamUP_*
Rockpopple wrote...
Sakanade wrote...
I stand corrected, Metacritic has dropped to
4.4/10
How disingenuous of you. Those are User scores. In other words, the most rage-filled individuals with the most time on their hands raging on the interwebs.
Metacritics CRITICAL review score is 85/100 out of 10 reviews. Oh, but that doesn't fit your narrative. Carry on.
Modifié par Deadmac, 09 mars 2011 - 03:38 .
ejoslin wrote...
Ok, I am NOT saying there are no troll ratings (I have no clue) but honestly, if someone has not been on the boards and loved DAO, I can see the reaction being, "What on earth is this? This is so different. Ugh!" Just because someone is upset about the changes and was hoping for another game closer to DAO so gives a poor score does NOT make them a troll.
It really may be hard for people to believe, but some people are NOT going to like the changes. They're not going to like the new combat system, the dialog wheel, the inability to talk to companions while out and about, the lack of interaction like with the kids in Lothering. And they're going to rate the game badly because of that.
It's something that happens when you change your target audience mid-series. I'm sure DA2 is a great game. But it is DIFFERENT! And that is not going to be universally well received.
Modifié par Mantaal, 09 mars 2011 - 03:17 .
Sereaph502 wrote...
Notice how most people posting in this thread don't even have DA2 registered on their accounts?
Yeah, it means they either only played the demo (which is only a single section of the game. GASP! You mean one single part of the demo isn't what the entire game is going to be?) or are just trolls looking to get some attention.
Nothing else to say, really.
Mantaal wrote...
ejoslin wrote...
Ok, I am NOT saying there are no troll ratings (I have no clue) but honestly, if someone has not been on the boards and loved DAO, I can see the reaction being, "What on earth is this? This is so different. Ugh!" Just because someone is upset about the changes and was hoping for another game closer to DAO so gives a poor score does NOT make them a troll.
It really may be hard for people to believe, but some people are NOT going to like the changes. They're not going to like the new combat system, the dialog wheel, the inability to talk to companions while out and about, the lack of interaction like with the kids in Lothering. And they're going to rate the game badly because of that.
It's something that happens when you change your target audience mid-series. I'm sure DA2 is a great game. But it is DIFFERENT! And that is not going to be universally well received.
You talk against a Wall. You are a Troll if you say something like that and a hater and you cant life with changes!
Its common sence that everyone dont likes DA2 is clueless Troll never played the game and just made an accound to rate bad because they have nothing better to do.
On the other hand you have those 10/10 peoples and those give a 100% accurate review
Modifié par JoePilot, 09 mars 2011 - 04:05 .
Modifié par BTCentral, 09 mars 2011 - 04:19 .
BTCentral wrote...
A lot of the reviews out there can't seem to get past the fact that Dragon Age 2 is a different game in it's own right and not Dragon Age: Origins 2.
This one however does not, and I completely agree with the majority of what is said, a very fair review.
Just because it's in the same series, doesn't mean it has to follow the same story, or have the same features - some sort of overall theme, sure but it doesn't mean they have to continue the first game...17thknight wrote...
BTCentral wrote...
A lot of the reviews out there can't seem to get past the fact that Dragon Age 2 is a different game in it's own right and not Dragon Age: Origins 2.
This one however does not, and I completely agree with the majority of what is said, a very fair review.
If they didn't want to a game to be compared ot the original
Then they shouldn't have made a sequel.
This game is universally inferior to DA:O.
Odd, works fine for me.Siegfried.m wrote...
Dragon Age 2 PC page on metacritc, is unavailable from many many hours....
Retour en haut