The big 'Can my pc run this?' topic
#251
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:09
Then we atleast know how low 'low' will look. Too bad the consoles can't take screenshots (photo's aren't good enough), so we could compare.
#252
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:14
#253
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:20
But if you're not too much into graphics, go for the pc version, since it's the way it's meant to be played. Console versions are just there to make more money.
#254
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:23
Chikkenstorm wrote...
Well, you're above minimum specs, so I'd say atleast low. Mediumish probably.
But if you're not too much into graphics, go for the pc version, since it's the way it's meant to be played. Console versions are just there to make more money.
Ha ha, I hear you brother!
Here is my beef, I recently picked up a game called Draken Sang. I can usually push games pretty good to look very playable, but what happens is I get artifacting from my video card when I do this...so I'm forced to lower the settings so it's less taxing on the video card.
Makes much sence...
Again, this just goes back to wanting to know what it will look like.
#255
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:24
#256
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:25
Oh and yes, I'm a pc fanboy. Never had a console in my life. So I might not be too objective on this subject
#257
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:27
(Let me know what you guys think, it's on the cusp of recommended settings but kind of a weird setup.)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ 2.41 GHz
2 GB RAM, Windows XP
X4 Nvidia Geforce 7950 GX2, 512 MB of video memory (Four of them running in... quad SLI? In four PCI express slots)
They're pretty old components, but I'm hoping the four graphics cards will allow me to play at high settings. I'm willing to play at 720P on my TV rather than 1080P in order to get the higher settings with some anti-aliasing.
What do you guys think?
I'll probably just get a Radeon 4870 or 5770 if I can't run the game at high. I'll wait and see how it runs with what I've got, though.
Modifié par Talisander, 29 octobre 2009 - 02:34 .
#258
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:28
It's all good my man. If I had to pick, I would say I'm a console fanboy for pretty much the same reasons as you.
But I do enjoy my PC games...
My main problem is this. I watched a video a while back, I think it was 5 parts? Basically they had to retake a tower. There was all this awesome smoke blowing around and all that...now what I'm affriad of is if I get it for PC, and I may have to turn that stuff off...how will it affect the main game ya know?
Certain little graphic things like that add a whole ****E-TON to a story. Know what I mean?
#259
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:34
Talisander wrote...
Wow, thanks so much for the feedback about dual and quad core processors, Bioware! Now I feel a lot more confident with the comp I've secured to play this game. The old behemoth:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ 2.41 GHz
2 GB RAM
X4 Nvidia Geforce 7950 GX2, 512 MB of video memory (Four of them running in... quad SLI? In four PCI express slots)
They're pretty old components, but I'm hoping the four graphics cards will allow me to play at high settings. I'm willing to play at 720P on my TV rather than 1080P in order to get the higher settings with some anti-aliasing.
What do you guys think?
I'll probably just get a Radeon 4870 or 5770 if I can't run the game at high. I'll wait and see how it runs with what I've got, though.
Kind of annoying to think of how a single high-end card beats that setup today at most non-specialized games, that must have cost a fortune!
Regardless, you should be able to reach high settings unless the game does not take advantage of SLi at all.
(Even then you can probably get by with high settings).
Modifié par Yenkaz, 29 octobre 2009 - 02:34 .
#260
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 02:40
I actually like the idea of replacing the four geforce cards, because they're incredibly loud, even at idle, and I also use the computer as a midi box for my keyboard.
Personally I've never spent more than 2000 dollars on a computer, and that's going back to the early nineties. My brother bought this PC monster to celebrate when his company became successful, so he was basically just looking for the most expensive gaming PC on the market... in 2005, I think.
He stopped using it when Crysis came out and he realized it wouldn't run smoothly above medium-ish settings. I convinced him to give it to me last week
Modifié par Talisander, 29 octobre 2009 - 02:48 .
#261
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:48
#262
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:53
4GB Ram
Q6600 2.4Ghz Quad
8800GT
#263
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:57
Modifié par mcwebber, 29 octobre 2009 - 03:58 .
#264
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 04:04
Devs said that you don't need a quad-core (see the begin post aswell). A 3.2Ghz dual-core is more than enough.mcwebber wrote...
hey guys i was under the impression that quad cores were only used mainly for multithreading and most game worked off of one core so wouldnt a good dual core 3.2 and good video card nvidia 7950 512 run the game midium to high just asking thanks
Your GPU certainly is the bottleneck, but medium-high will work I think.
@yaghr: That'll work close to max, if not at max. So you're perfectly fine.
Modifié par Chikkenstorm, 29 octobre 2009 - 04:05 .
#265
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 04:12
#266
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 04:14
Modifié par Guy4142, 29 octobre 2009 - 04:22 .
#267
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 04:26
Guy4142 wrote...
I just found out my current graphics card uses more power than a 3870, so no worries.
Your PSU sounded fine anyway though
Modifié par AlexJK, 29 octobre 2009 - 04:27 .
#268
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 04:28
#269
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:02
Not at all. In fact, running below native gives a "fake AA" effect that's often rather nice.Chikkenstorm wrote...
You should always run the game in the native resolution for your screen. Else it's going to look messed up (unless you have an old CTR monitor, they don't have native resolutions).
#270
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:09
He's not above minspec in any meaningful way -- in fact the 7600GT *is* one variety of minspec.Chikkenstorm wrote...
Well, you're above minimum specs, so I'd say atleast low. Mediumish probably.
As the bottom of the "medium" group of cards, the 7800gt = 20 pixel shaders + 8 vertex. 7600gt = 12 pixel + 5 vertex, and half the memory bandwidth.
So, yeah, low.
#271
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:11
Windows Vista Home premium 64 bit
AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-core 2.40Ghz 64-bit
8 GB DDR3 Ram
1 GB Ati HD Radeon 4600
I have and 23" Widescreen LCD Monitor that can do 1080p
native resolution 1920x1080
How well will I be able to run this game? really looking forward to it.
Also I will be upgrading to Windows 7 Home premium 64bit.
Any help would be greatly appreciated : )
#272
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:14
You really have four GX2s? I've never heard of a motherboard with more than three vidcard-speed PCI-E slots. I suspect you *are* running quad SLI, which is just two GX2s (each of those being two GPUs on a single card).Talisander wrote...
Wow, thanks so much for the feedback about dual and quad core processors, Bioware! Now I feel a lot more confident with the comp I've secured to play this game. The Old Behemoth:
(Let me know what you guys think, it's on the cusp of recommended settings but kind of a weird setup.)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ 2.41 GHz
2 GB RAM, Windows XP
X4 Nvidia Geforce 7950 GX2, 512 MB of video memory (Four of them running in... quad SLI? In four PCI express slots)
In any case, I'd advise you to sell these for whatever you can get -- not because they won't run DA properly, but because it must be a giant pain.
Modifié par flem1, 29 octobre 2009 - 05:14 .
#273
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:20
I have
Intel Duo Core 2 cpu e4500 2.20 ghz, 2g ddr2 ram
my graphics card is a nvidia geforce gtx pny 260
#274
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:24
Well, first, it depends which 4600 card -- 4650 or 4670?Jace3957 wrote...
1 GB Ati HD Radeon 4600
I have and 23" Widescreen LCD Monitor that can do 1080p
native resolution 1920x1080
These are both memory bandwidth limited, though the 4650 is much more so. That means at high resolutions (like 1080p) they'll fall off. So at native you may be limited to a bit above or below medium, depending on which of the cards it is.
At a lower resolution like 720p (or one of the other 16*9 alternatives -- 1366*768, 1600*900), you should be able to do high on the 4670 fairly easily. The 4650 probably between medium and high.
#275
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 05:26
Maximum graphics, though your processor will bottleneck you at times.Chozos wrote...
I dont have concerns about running the game as I am above min (thought not quite at recommended) anyone know how far i can push it with my specs? Any advice would be most welcome.
I have
Intel Duo Core 2 cpu e4500 2.20 ghz, 2g ddr2 ram
my graphics card is a nvidia geforce gtx pny 260





Retour en haut




