724 réponses à ce sujet

[deathbook19]

i am quite sure my computer can run this on good setting but i would like confirmation.

windows xp

4gb ram

gtx 260 (216 core)

intel core2duo e4600

500gb HD

[Yenkaz]

chasethesunset wrote...

I'm not hoping for anything anywhere near max, but I'm hoping I'll do ok with:
Intel Pentium D 3.0GHz (Dual Core)
Nvidia 9500GT
2gigs RAM
1280x1024 is what I run my resolution at...but I run some games lower to get better graphics.
Windows Vista.

I want to get Windows 7, but not sure if I'd see a big enough improvement in performance to justify it. (money's tight)

Medium, no AA.

[chasethesunset]

Yenkaz wrote...

chasethesunset wrote...

I'm not hoping for anything anywhere near max, but I'm hoping I'll do ok with:
Intel Pentium D 3.0GHz (Dual Core)
Nvidia 9500GT
2gigs RAM
1280x1024 is what I run my resolution at...but I run some games lower to get better graphics.
Windows Vista.

I want to get Windows 7, but not sure if I'd see a big enough improvement in performance to justify it. (money's tight)

Medium, no AA.

That's been my average with games on this system. Medium with no AA.
Except for two rare cases: Assassin's Creed and Dead Space. Both I could run with everything on and maxed. Never checked the FPS, but never had any lag and that's all that mattered to me.

It blew my mind how well Assassin's Creed ran

[deathbook19]

e6300 sorry

[wrexingcrew]

deathbook, is your processor overclocked?

[jableskage]

chasethesunset wrote...

Yenkaz wrote...

chasethesunset wrote...

I'm not hoping for anything anywhere near max, but I'm hoping I'll do ok with:
Intel Pentium D 3.0GHz (Dual Core)
Nvidia 9500GT
2gigs RAM
1280x1024 is what I run my resolution at...but I run some games lower to get better graphics.
Windows Vista.

I want to get Windows 7, but not sure if I'd see a big enough improvement in performance to justify it. (money's tight)

Medium, no AA.

That's been my average with games on this system. Medium with no AA.
Except for two rare cases: Assassin's Creed and Dead Space. Both I could run with everything on and maxed. Never checked the FPS, but never had any lag and that's all that mattered to me.

It blew my mind how well Assassin's Creed ran

AC1 on max with that rig? i smell BS

[miltos33]

First of all I am glad that all my fellow gamers on dual cores can feel a bit more relaxed now that the devs downgraded the recommended requirements. Although I knew it all along that a decent dual core would be able to run this game well enough. But what about all of us on quad cores? Does anybody know whether the game was made to take advantage of four cores, or the earlier requirements were just a marketing gimmick to give the impression that this is a next gen game?

[Keswyn]

I'd like to know if my pc will run it please, it's just below the minimum, but that hasn't stopped me from playing in the past, on minimal settings...

My Specs:
OS: Windows XP with SP2
CPU: AMD Athlon 64, 1.8 GHz
RAM: 1GB
Video: NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT 128MB

I'm just under on the CPU speed, will that make DA:O completely unplayable?

[wrexingcrew]

miltos33 wrote...

First of all I am glad that all my fellow gamers on dual cores can feel a bit more relaxed now that the devs downgraded the recommended requirements. Although I knew it all along that a decent dual core would be able to run this game well enough. But what about all of us on quad cores? Does anybody know whether the game was made to take advantage of four cores, or the earlier requirements were just a marketing gimmick to give the impression that this is a next gen game?

What's your clock speed?  The system requirements thread (have to be logged in to see devs posts, but I recommend doing that) will give you slightly contradictory answers.  At one point, a dev suggests that you'll see improvement, but that it won't be "significant" - at another point, a dev suggests that a higher clock speed dual core will run the game better than a slower quad core.  To me that suggests that it probably won't do much for you.

[Syrellaris]

CPU: QuadCore Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, 1600 MHz (6 x 267)
Mobo: Asus P5N32-E SLI (2 PCI, 1 PCI-E x1, 3 PCI-E x16, 4 DDR2 DIMM, Audio, Dual Gigabit LAN, IEEE-1394)
Chipset: nVIDIA nForce 680i SLI
RAM: Corsair XMS2 CM2X2048-6400C4DHX 2 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM (5-5-5-18 @ 400 Mhz) (4-4-4-13 @ 270 Mhz) -> times 4. (so 8 GB in total but im using only 4 ATM till i get a 64 bit windows 7)

Videocard: Asus EN8800GTX 768 MB GDDR3


Edit : My cpu runs at 2.4 ghz standard, but I have a speedstep like Bios, so it throttles the speed depending on usage.

Modifié par Syrellaris, 01 novembre 2009 - 01:54 .

[miltos33]

Yeah, I've always thought that the earlier quad requirement was more of a marketing gimmick. Anyway, my cpu is the Phenom II x4 955 @3.2 GHz that I can easily overclock to 3.6 GHz with stock voltage.

Modifié par miltos33, 01 novembre 2009 - 01:57 .

[miltos33]

@Syrellaris are you asking? I would be surprised if you couldn't max the game.

[wrexingcrew]

Syrellaris wrote...

CPU: QuadCore Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, 1600 MHz (6 x 267)
Mobo: Asus P5N32-E SLI (2 PCI, 1 PCI-E x1, 3 PCI-E x16, 4 DDR2 DIMM, Audio, Dual Gigabit LAN, IEEE-1394)
Chipset: nVIDIA nForce 680i SLI
RAM: Corsair XMS2 CM2X2048-6400C4DHX 2 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM (5-5-5-18 @ 400 Mhz) (4-4-4-13 @ 270 Mhz) -> times 4. (so 8 GB in total but im using only 4 ATM till i get a 64 bit windows 7)
Videocard: Asus EN8800GTX 768 MB GDDR3

Ha - it's you!  Yep, that's max with no problems or I'll eat my own card.

@miltros: It's unfortunate.  The only positive interpretation I can come up with is that they don't want to scare off dual core owners, so they're playing up that angle.  You'd think they'd talk up quad core performance for the same reason, though - the objectives don't need to conflict if the game was designed to take advantage of various setups. 

[Syrellaris]

miltos33 wrote...

@Syrellaris are you asking? I would be surprised if you couldn't max the game.

nah im not asking. I build my own computers and stuff. This is my old rig that im currently using. Working out a I7 one for the new dx11 vid cards.

[miltos33]

@wrexincrew: Yeah, it is hard to say what their real intentions are. Let's hope that the game was designed to take advantage of both architectures. Thanks for the link anyway.

[Syrellaris]

@ Miltos



I believe the game is designed to only use the Dual core to its advantage. However, if you see a slow down, while using a quad core, then set the architecture of your quad core to Dual core for Dragon Age. This should force your Quad core to go only use 2 cores with the full capacity for Dragon age, basicly creating a virtual like Dual core architecture.

[miltos33]

Yes I can easily do that by using the AMD overdrive and if you go for an I7 8xx for your new build they can do it automatically.

[miltos33]

Having said that, If I were to go for an i7 I would still go for the 9xx series.

[Yenkaz]

Keswyn wrote...

I'd like to know if my pc will run it please, it's just below the minimum, but that hasn't stopped me from playing in the past, on minimal settings...

My Specs:
OS: Windows XP with SP2
CPU: AMD Athlon 64, 1.8 GHz
RAM: 1GB
Video: NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT 128MB

I'm just under on the CPU speed, will that make DA:O completely unplayable?

You can probably struggle on with low settings, just expect framerate to drop substantially at times.

[ElektroGuy]

Hi, I'm wondering if my computer can run DA:O on maybe high setting with some AA:



Win 7 64 bit

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 3 GHz

4 gigs RAM

EVGA GeForce 9800 GT 512MB



Thanks for any help!

[miltos33]

ElektroGuy wrote...

Hi, I'm wondering if my computer can run DA:O on maybe high setting with some AA:

Win 7 64 bit
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 3 GHz
4 gigs RAM
EVGA GeForce 9800 GT 512MB

Thanks for any help!

I bet it can.

[ElektroGuy]

Oh I forgot to mention I'd like to run the game in my native resolution of 1680x1050. Think it'll work or will I have to settle for a lower res?

[Chikkenstorm]

ElektroGuy wrote...

Oh I forgot to mention I'd like to run the game in my native resolution of 1680x1050. Think it'll work or will I have to settle for a lower res?

Should work like a charm. Worst case is that you'll run it on high, instead of max.

[Chikkenstorm]

Holy crap, tripple post ftl.

Modifié par Chikkenstorm, 01 novembre 2009 - 03:22 .

[Chikkenstorm]

This forum is a hell for my pc at the moment... I could've gone for the sixtet post, but I thought that wouldn't be a good idea.

Modifié par Chikkenstorm, 01 novembre 2009 - 03:30 .