724 réponses à ce sujet

[DPB]

Slim Charles wrote...
I'll bet money right now it's not. I predict that when the game runs out people are going to flock to these forums complaining of low fps on their 7800, 7900, x1800.

Please read the developer posts in the original system requirements thread.

http://daforums.biow...82449&forum=135

These two  in particular:

To the older AMD questions I ran the game all through development on the following system:

AMD
64 X2 Dual 4400+ 2.21Ghz w/ 3 gigs of RAM which I assume is DDR 2
without pulling the box apart. I tried and it runs really well on 1.5
Gigs but I constantly had a crapload of other apps running so hence the
3.
The video card I had was a 256MB 7800GT.
OS was XP

I ran on medium settings and the game ran really well - 99% of the time about 20fps and usually between 25-40.

In general we designed the game so that 7800-7950 series nVidias
and X1800XT ATIs would run the game well on medium graphics settings.
Anything above that and you should be thinking about switching to the
higher settings. You should know that the game looks great on medium
settings as well, I wouldn't lose sleep if my system didn't meet the
recommended specifications.

Modifié par dbankier, 29 octobre 2009 - 03:23 .

[flem1]

GhoXen wrote...

Purple Lady wrote...

I have a PC above the minimum specs, but only get 15fps in the CC (1024*768 resolution). I'm quite worried (the FPS will certainly drop ingame)
Here are my specs:
System Model: EasyNote SB85
Processor: Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.0GHz
Memory: 3062MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
Windows vista 32

It's a laptop, cannot upgrade (and can't afford a new PC). Any advice?

Your specs are actually not all that much above minimum specs. I think it merely reachs the minimum specs.

The keyword here is "M". Laptop graphics cards/CPU generally have massive disadvantages when compared to desktop hardware.

Erm, actually, the keyword for her is "GS".  The 8600M GS has *half* the shaders of the 8600M GT (or the desktop 8600GT) -- 16 vs 32.  Clocks are still decent (much better than the desktop 8500GT, for example), but it really shouldn't be called a 8600 at all.

So you're on low, I'm afraid.  Probably pretty decently on low, but still low.

[flem1]

My list was basically rule of thumb based on the following reference points specifically given by the devs:

7800GT on medium
9600GT on high
8800GTS (512mb) on very high (maximum) at 1080p

There's little point in arguing with these, since I'm just reciting what was in dev posts.

As I said, though, notebook cards will vary. If you want to find out yourself, click on your card on the list to the right here and compare the # of shaders, clock speeds, and memory bus size to the desktop versions (5 second google!).  Hint:  if your vidcard isn't in class 1 or 2, it's going to be rough going (low or worse).

Modifié par flem1, 29 octobre 2009 - 03:48 .

[BlacknBlue485]

I'm running an NVIDIA 9600 GDDR3 1GB AND dUAL CORE 2 AT 3.17GHZ

[I HAS A FLAVOUR]

If I can run this at a decent resolution/FPS I will be happy:



AMD Athlon™ 64 Processor 3500+

2.21 GHz, 2GB of Ram

Service Pack 2

GeForce 7600 GT, 256

Windows XP



Current Display Mode: 1680 x 1050

[delijoe]

Andreas Papathanasis wrote...

Full recommended specs:

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz Processor or equivalent
AMD Phenom II X2 Dual-Core 2.7 GHz or greater
RAM: 2 GB (XP) or 3 GB (Windows Vista/Windows 7)
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater
DVD ROM (Physical copy)
20 GB HD space

Minimum requirements stay as they were before.

As a reminder, recommended specs should run you the game at the highest quality setting available, and at relatively high resolutions. If you meet or exceed the video card primarily, and the CPU isn't considerably lagging behind, you will get all the graphics details the game has to offer.

Hmm... so I wonder if I could get max settings now:

CPU: Core 2 Duo 2.13 GHz
RAM: 2 GB
Video: Geforce 8800GT 512 MB
OS: XP

My video card is pretty much equivalent but the CPU lags slightly.  I'm thinking high settings def but maybe not max.

[OriginalGUmby]

Pentium® D cpu 3.20ghz

2gb ram

Radeon X1950 PRO



I think it works but at what level of graphics settings?

[OriginalGUmby]

oh 512 MB on the GPU

[BlacknBlue485]

Hey Flavour upgrade 2 service pack 3 and it should run even better!

[Silent Protagonist]

Windows Vista™ Home Premium (6.0, Build 6002) Service Pack 2

Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz

2046MB RAM

DirectX 10

NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT



How will this run?

[Packetdancer]

If you really want to impress me buy yourself a graphic card nvidia gtx 295 or the ati radeon 5870...the 16 gigs ram are overkill...my xp can only use 3 although I have 4gigs ram...quad core is good and will serve you well in the near future and the sound blaster doesn't matter anyway...

Actually, the Soundblaster *will* make a marginal difference in some games; onboard audio /does/ use the CPU for a lot of the processing, while a dedicated sound card allows you to offload that processing onto the card itself.  However, the difference is generally so miniscule that only the most diehard FPS gamers who are determined to eke out every single cycle they can -- the sort who buy Xeno network cards to offload their network processing, as well -- are probably going to actually care about the performance gain.

I would not think Dragon Age is one of those games where the difference between 'I have onboard audio' and 'Look, I've got an X-Fi!' is going to be significant, performance-wise.

(Sorry; I used to be a games programmer.  Vast swaths of my brain are still filled with this sort of stuff.)

[Delimeat567]

I use a laptop, how do you think it will run?



ASUS G50VT

Windows Vista Home Edition x64

Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU P8600@2.40GHz(2 CPU's)

4094MB RAM

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

[Packetdancer]

Medium: Nvidia 7800, 7900, 8600, 9500, GT120; ATI 1800, 1900, 2600, 3650
Medium-high: Nvidia GT220; ATI 4650
High: Nvidia 9600, 8800GS/GTS320/GTS640; ATI 2900, 3800, 4670
Max: Nvidia 8800 (all other models), 9800, GTS250, GTX260, GTX275, GTX280, GTX285; ATI 4770, 4800, 5700, 5800

What, no GTX295 on the list? What about the insane gamers who drop +$500 on a dual-GPU overclocked card with 1.8GB of RAM? How will they know if their card can handle the game?? Think of the children!!

[Packetdancer]

ASUS G50VT
Windows Vista Home Edition x64
Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU P8600@2.40GHz(2 CPU's)
4094MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

A lot of this will depend on what resolution you're running in.  The 9600M GT should probably handle the game reasonably well at 1440x900 and medium or medium-high settings, I'd think, but I'd imagine running at 1920x1200 or anything similar would be paaaainful.  The 9800M GT is a considerably more capable card (higher bandwidth, and twice the shaders, if I recall correctly), so if you're hanging around at the lower resolutions I'd think you could definitely get high settings out of your setup.  If you're pushing the resolution to 1920x1200 or such, you might have to drop down to medium or medium-high again.

(Obviously this is all guesswork; I'm just basing this on my gaming experiences on my own laptop, with similar specs but the slightly more anemic 9600M GT.  I plan to play DA:O on my desktop, though.)

[flem1]

Silent Protagonist wrote...

Windows Vista™ Home Premium (6.0, Build 6002) Service Pack 2
Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz
2046MB RAM
DirectX 10
NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

How will this run?

Low-medium.  If you want to upgrade, it's your video card that's holding you back.

[OriginalGUmby]

Pentium® D cpu 3.20ghz



2gb ram



Radeon X1950 PRO 512mb



whats up with my rig?

[MrGOH]

OriginalGUmby wrote...

Pentium® D cpu 3.20ghz

2gb ram

Radeon X1950 PRO 512mb

whats up with my rig?

Low, maybe a setting or two at medium depending on how many FPS you like. But it will run.

[OriginalGUmby]

Windows XP Minimum Specifications

OS: Windows XP with SP3

CPU: Intel Core 2 Single (or equivalent) running at 1.6Ghz or greater

AMD 64 (or equivalent) running at 2.0Ghz or greater

RAM: 1GB or more

Video: ATI Radeon X850 256MB or greater

NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT 128MB or greater

DVD ROM (Physical copy)

20 GB HD space



Windows Vista/Windows 7 Minimum Specifications

OS: Windows Vista with SP1, Windows 7

CPU: Intel Core 2 Single (or equivalent) running at 1.6Ghz or greater

AMD 64 (or equivalent) running at 2.0Ghz or greater

RAM: 1.5 GB or more

Video: ATI Radeon X1550 256MB or greater

NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256MB or greater

DVD ROM (Physical copy)

20 GB HD space



Recommended Specifications

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz Processor or equivalent

AMD Phenom II X2 Dual-Core 2.7 GHz or greater

RAM: 2 GB (XP) or 3 GB (Windows Vista/Windows 7)

Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater

NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater

DVD ROM (Physical copy)

20 GB HD space



given these new specs I am very skeptical of your assessment...

[GhoXen]

@OriginalGUmby



It's your CPU.

[OriginalGUmby]

its dual core

[MrGOH]

GhoXen wrote...

@OriginalGUmby

It's your CPU.

Yup. Also that the devs consider between an average between 20 and 25 FPS playable, which bugs the hell out of me. I assume most folks would like solid 30 FPS.

[Rankith]

P4 3.6Ghz CPU
4G ram
GeForce 8800GT
Windows XP

How am I lookin? 

[Matthew Moore]

Macbook Pro (2009)

Windows 7
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.6ghz
4 gb Ram
Nvidia 9600gt 256mb

Modifié par Matthew Moore, 29 octobre 2009 - 05:58 .

[stfb1055]

windows vista going update to windows 7

Amd Phenom™ II x4 955 Processor 3.20ghz

Quad Core

8gb ram

ATI Radoeon 4800 series



correct me on graphic card i alway spelling wrong xD

[OriginalGUmby]

how much over Intel Core 2 Single @1.6 is my Pentium® D cpu 3.20ghz?



How can it be so low?