147 réponses à ce sujet

[BiggusDikkus]

Sinvx wrote...

BiggusDikkus wrote...

2.5

I finshed this game in 10 hours, incomparable to my 40 hours in Origins. Well, I suppose they are doing a pretty good job of getting the CoD Audience: http://www.nowgamer....-dutys-audience

10 hours? I don't believe you... Took me 9 hours to finish the first act.

How on earth...?

[atheelogos]

so far? 5

[Corti78]

3 at best.

[Sabariel]

2.5/3

[Loremazd]

BiggusDikkus wrote...

2.5

I finshed this game in 10 hours, incomparable to my 40 hours in Origins. Well, I suppose they are doing a pretty good job of getting the CoD Audience: http://www.nowgamer....-dutys-audience

I dunno, i've been playing in the first act for 14 hours. There's a loooooot to do in the first act.  Mind this is on hard, and i've had some tough encounters i've had to try a few times.

As for enjoyment level... oh, 4. I really like  the characters and there's quite a lot of quests to do when you're thorough about exploration.

Modifié par Loremazd, 10 mars 2011 - 03:21 .

[flamesoul32]

5
I'm having a lot of fun playing as my version of Hawk.

[Tenken_h]

3.75.

[PanzerDivision]

20 out of 5.

This is 4 times 5, f***er, 1 for each playthrough.

[BiggusDikkus]

Loremazd wrote...

BiggusDikkus wrote...

2.5

I finshed this game in 10 hours, incomparable to my 40 hours in Origins. Well, I suppose they are doing a pretty good job of getting the CoD Audience: http://www.nowgamer....-dutys-audience

I dunno, i've been playing in the first act for 14 hours. There's a loooooot to do in the first act.  Mind this is on hard, and i've had some tough encounters i've had to try a few times.

I played on normal and only did a few sidequests.

[godlike13]

4.5

[Jademoon121]

4-ish

[DM Veil]

4/5 so far.

The few negatives I have are:

• The camera not zooming out farther
• Lacking a bit of depth in conversations
• Not being able to throw armor on my companions (even if it didn't change their look).

Beyond that the game is pretty fun to play, I've played 13 hours and haven't been to the deeproads yet because of all the side quests. I've enjoyed the combat in the game (playing on Nightmare) and have found it a fun challenge to play through. I feel the graphics are very nice on high settings with the high res textures downloaded, they fit the style of Dragon Age, and while I wish there were more choices in conversations I have enjoyed the stories I've played through thus far.

All in all, it's not a perfect game for me, but I still enjoy it a lot and thank Bioware for their work.

Modifié par DM Veil, 10 mars 2011 - 03:37 .

[Loremazd]

BiggusDikkus wrote...

Loremazd wrote...

BiggusDikkus wrote...

2.5

I finshed this game in 10 hours, incomparable to my 40 hours in Origins. Well, I suppose they are doing a pretty good job of getting the CoD Audience: http://www.nowgamer....-dutys-audience

I dunno, i've been playing in the first act for 14 hours. There's a loooooot to do in the first act.  Mind this is on hard, and i've had some tough encounters i've had to try a few times.

I played on normal and only did a few sidequests.

Normal is far to easy for me, so I can certainly see it being faster there. There's quite a bit of meat in the sidequests though. Lots of Templar vs Mages ethics, lots of Qunari culture and interaction.  The just dont seem to end, sidequests lead to more sidequests.

There's a full spectrum of quality when it comes to them though, so far i've had one that reused an earlier map, and a few that were multipart and varied.  Some were anticlimatic, some (especially the qunari ones) were very interesting and kinda epic.

4/5 so far.

Modifié par Loremazd, 10 mars 2011 - 03:28 .

[NvVanity]

4/5

Gameplay is certainly more fun. Only in the first Act right now but I don't really see the whole "less dialog then origins" complaint. Seems fine to me.

Not a five due to bringing in the ME squadmates non customizable armor. That feature really irked me.

[HyperLimited]

I give it a 4.

It doesn't get a 5 because of the insane amount of map recycling. <_<

Modifié par HyperLimited, 10 mars 2011 - 03:32 .

[DarkSpider88]

I am in about the middle of the game and so far I would say a 3.8 to 4.3. Since this is a spoiler 3 forum I am afraid to expand any farther than that.

[Saphara]

4/5. First Act was looooong, but as im progressing through the game it's beginging to flesh out and be much more worth it. I like seeing the consequences of what i did in Act 1 appear in Act 2 and beyond.

Only real complaint i have is i hate the new elf artistry. Merril and Fenris look fine, but everyone else looks so weird and too skinny. love their eyes though.

Also, as a mage i didnt replace my robes til Act 2. WTG drop rate

Modifié par Saphara, 10 mars 2011 - 03:50 .

[MartinJHolm]

I'm not that far into the game, but I doubt my opinion will change.

It's not bad game, but it's not what I had hoped.

I'll give it 3/5.

[Pyrate_d]

2.8

the good:

Improved gameplay and combat, with vastly improved abilities.

the bad:

Though characters are individually well voiced and written, and quests are individually well done, these things don't fit together at all. There's not enough central plot to connect all the quests. The game feels like a lot less than the sum of its parts.

One thing that bugs me: why does Hawke form a party and go on adventures? In origins, your motivation is pretty clear. In DA2, I really don't see why you're driven to be a hero. If you're just a refugee trying to make it, why go hunting dragons and trying to solve everyone's problems. To me, this is the biggest problem with the game. I shouldn't feel so directionless in an RPG.

[Luminary Panther]

So far I would give it about a 3.5. I don't think it's a terrible game, but I've certainly played better (playing on the PC). I usually expect more out of Bioware games though. This one has been disappointing.

[The Corporate]

0. I can't think of a single positive point to this utterly dreadful game. I'll repost a review I just gave on someone's poll;

"I loved Dragon Age: Origins. It had serious technical issues on the PS3 but I still completed it anyway because it was just that damn good.

Dragon Age II is an abortion. It is Dragon Age: Origins with gameplay by the mentally underage, scriptwriting and character interaction by the shut-in, level design by the lazy and graphics by the blind. There is not a single credible point I can use to recommend this game; it's an insipid, tasteless, boring and lazy effort, right from start to finish.

I've already returned my copy and will seriously reconsider preordering anything from BioWare ever again."

Edit: And before people dismiss this as your usual bashing of a sequel because it's not the same as the original, I'm just going to point out that I normally love sequels and approach them with an open mind. ME2 wasn't completely the same as ME but was a fantastic game in its own right, for example. I approached this one with the same open mind and feel like Bioware have taken a ****** all over it.

Modifié par The Corporate, 10 mars 2011 - 06:20 .

[XRed_RumX]

1.5

[SSJShancus]

HyperLimited wrote...

I give it a 4.

It doesn't get a 5 because of the insane amount of map recycling. <_<

This.

[screwoffreg]

3/5. If there is one hell of an expansion for this game that wraps up the loose bits of the Champions story that now flutter in the wind then maybe I'll ramp this saga up to a solid 4.

I don't know if Bioware is trying a "hub" concept with DA II from which several expansions/DLC will finish the story, but if they are there are far better ways to do it.

Fallout New Vegas has a satisfying ending but STILL has a number of DLC coming that will flesh out the story and change even more of the Fallout world.  Do you NEED the DLC to complete the game and its story?  No.  DA II just feels incomplete, and not in the "middle sequel" way either.

Modifié par screwoffreg, 10 mars 2011 - 06:11 .

[JalenTigh]

3.5 - Once the intial anger over all the changes settles down, I think thats gonna be about the average score.