158 réponses à ce sujet

[Andraste_Reborn]

Nobody, anywhere, is going to make Baldur's Gate 3. It's unnecessary and the licensing issues around the IP are a nightmare. Not to mention that two editions of D&D have come out since the last game.

The next Forgotten Realms game will be Neverwinter, which is being developed by Crypt Studios.

[brunomalta]

You had to be there on the Forums when Fallout 3 was annouced. It was way crazier than here. But i disgress, Bethesda is another company that does not make good RPGs anymore. Obsidian is the way to go, if only they could fix their problem in making bug filled games.

[jussyr]

chaosapiant wrote...

If ANYONE make BG3 I'd be pissed. It came to a very satisfactory conclusion, and there is no way we could get another DND RPG with the same protagonist using 2nd edition rules. It would be a spin off at best, just using the name, and thus really doesn't need to be made.

Agreed.  I'm happy enough playing/waiting for the next parts of the BGII remake in the works using the DAO engine, if I'm in the mood for BG + something new.  Really, I'm happy enough just playing the original.

[Foxhound2020]

Bethesda? The company that always comes out with games that are riddled with so many bugs that its unplayable like Fallout was at release. Your characters face becomes a Picasso painting if you become a vampire and go to sleep in Oblivion; if you save too many times, your game is unplayable.

A hodgepodge of solo quests with a storyless, emotionless, voiceless, and disconnected protagonist that is presented in their games? eh, I like bioware more.

[ToJKa1]

electroban wrote...

hhh89 wrote...

Bethesda does differenT types of RPGs.

Yes they do but whose looking for an exact remake?

If Bethesda remade Fallout 2 into Fallout 3

Im fine with letting them do whatever to Baldurs GAte 3

you do understand that Bethesda is a one trick pony? All they can do is open world exploration focused games with poor stories, characters and RPG elements. And i say that as a Bethesda fan.

[Chromie]

Wait Bethesda?! Fallout 1 and 2 were rpg's Fallout 3 was shooter with Rpg elements! Less rpg in there then in Mass Effect 2. Baldurs Gate would suffed so bad under Bethesda. I know im going to love Skyrim but Story, character developement is not Bethesda strong points.

[jussyr]

New Vegas wasn't that bad, story/character wise. By comparison with their other games, at least; certainly wouldn't want them touching any of the Bioware franchises.

[El Codge]

Vengeful Nature wrote...

Sod that, they should do Thedas: Total War.



I'll be in my bunk...

Absolutely. Abso-f*king-lutely.

Imagine Dragon Age: Origins had just been the warmup. Once you're made Warden-General / King / Boss, the job of cleaning up the blight took place on a Total War style map of Felderen.

It'd give me something to do with those hundreds of Swords, Axes, armour pieces etc.

I wonder if there's a Mediaeval 2 mod out there?.....

[aftohsix]

 I want you to fire up Baldur's Gate right now.  Sit down.  Okay.

Start playing.  See if it still holds up.

[El Codge]

aftohsix wrote...

 I want you to fire up Baldur's Gate right now.  Sit down.  Okay.

Start playing.  See if it still holds up.

With the widescreen mod, it does. The artwork is still stunning.

[aftohsix]

You don't mind that it takes you five minutes (exaggeration) to walk across the screen?

EDIT #2:  And I'm not starting a fight but IMO a true classic game should be able to be played Vanilla and still be a great game.

I'm just saying back in the day it seemed like Goldeneye was the best game ever.  If you fire it up now I promise you're going to get frustrated with the controls.

Most games don't age well.  Some of them are timeless.  Baldur's Gate isn't one of those.

Modifié par aftohsix, 10 mars 2011 - 12:55 .

[jussyr]

Personally, I do a run through BGII every few months, on average. Still remains the best game I've ever played.

[FedericoV]

I do not think that Bioware holds any right on the BG franchise. I think that it is owned by Atari.

[ColdbringeR]

Use BGTutu with the widescreen mod and it looks as good as a 2D game can. Use the cheat keys to teleport your group if you find the traveling to be too slow (I don't mind, myself).

[keyip]

jussyr wrote...

New Vegas wasn't that bad, story/character wise. By comparison with their other games, at least; certainly wouldn't want them touching any of the Bioware franchises.

That's because Bethesda didn't develop New Vegas.

Unless you were talking about Obsidian when you made your comment, in which case they've definately done a lot better.

Modifié par keyip, 10 mars 2011 - 12:57 .

[ColdbringeR]

aftohsix wrote...

Most games don't age well.  Some of them are timeless.  Baldur's Gate isn't one of those.

I respect your opinion and wholeheartedly disagree.

[Siven80]

electroban wrote...

Hey Bioware, how about giving your Baldurs Gate IP to Bethesda? Then I don't have to worry you shafting one of the best PC titles of all time into consolation hell.

Thank you!

I try not to reply to juvenile posts like this, but seriously...grow up.

[AkiKishi]

jussyr wrote...

New Vegas wasn't that bad, story/character wise. By comparison with their other games, at least; certainly wouldn't want them touching any of the Bioware franchises.

Obsidian did all the bits you like about NV.

[aftohsix]

Modifié par aftohsix, 10 mars 2011 - 12:59 .

[jussyr]

keyip wrote...

That's because Bethesda didn't develop New Vegas.

Unless you were talking about Obsidian when you made your comment, in which case they've definately done a lot better.

No, I meant Bethesda.  Hadn't realised the publishing and development companies are separate.

[AkiKishi]

ColdbringeR wrote...

aftohsix wrote...

Most games don't age well.  Some of them are timeless.  Baldur's Gate isn't one of those.

I respect your opinion and wholeheartedly disagree.

People who like RPGs don't really fixate on graphics so much. Even the gold box games are still very playable despite "objectively" looking like crap

[John Forseti]

electroban wrote...

Hey Bioware, how about giving your Baldurs Gate IP to Bethesda? Then I don't have to worry you shafting one of the best PC titles of all time into consolation hell.

>compare Morrowind to Oblivion


Good joke!

[wowpwnslol]

electroban wrote...

Hey Bioware, how about giving your Baldurs Gate IP to Bethesda? Then I don't have to worry you shafting one of the best PC titles of all time into consolation hell.

Thank you!

Troll.

Bethesda is a garbage company, which releases games in beta stage. They also have crap story and go nowhere. As much as Bioware sold out, Bethesda having rights to BG3 would be blasphemy. They can stick to whatever new version of Failout or Elder Scrolls they're making.

[Insaner Robot]

jussyr wrote...

New Vegas wasn't that bad, story/character wise. By comparison with their other games, at least; certainly wouldn't want them touching any of the Bioware franchises.

But New Vegas isn't really an example of Bethesda's ability with story/character writing and implementing. It was developed by Obsidian.

Forgive my momentary loss of composure but after the wretched video game abortions that was the Baldur's gate dark alliance games. I don't want anybody other than Bioware or Obsidian to even consider another BG game. They are the only developers that worked on the original series, and the only ones I'd trust to do it right.

[Jordy Laforge]

 I pray people stop living in the 1990's. This tread is dumb. In before lock.