Anyone feel a little cheated siding with mages? (spoilers)
#151
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 01:48
#152
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 01:50
Malja wrote...
Sjofn wrote...
You know, given how the Templar lady is completely insane, I'm gonna go ahead and assume siding with the Templars is also going to be ... depressing.
I only sided with the mages my first time through because I wound up really liking Anders and romancing him, PLUS I felt all protective of poor Bethany. The ending made me want to cry. But in a good way, really.
Makes the whole "Alistair dumped me!" thing from DA:O seem lighthearted and adorable though.
Lol! I felt kinda derped from it as a templar sympathizer actually. "They aren't all bad. But you're MAKING me choose so hell I'll do it", then you see all that. So it's really anyone who didn't adopt that cynical viewpoint.
Although I was more of a mage sympathizer, I had the same general mindset... I really felt after a few mages resorted to blood magic that when forced to choose between the Circle and Templars, it was just a "I don't want to choose damnit... but if I must, I'll choose the Magi since the Templars technically provoked the Magi" action.
Ultimately, while I agree with the OP's assessment, I understood that they had to revert to blood magic tactics. So I felt Anders, while doing the wrong thing for the right reasons, would need to be sacrificed by my own character as the only neutral faction at this point in time. (Not to mention, the magi generally resonate with me as a libertarian, so there's the political angle too. I don't care how powerful one "can" be, only that they should be punished IF AND WHEN they coerce someone.)
#153
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 01:55
#154
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 02:00
#155
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 02:19
I do, however, think that they went a little overboard with the amount of Blood Mages in the end scenes. It'd have been nice not having to fight through hordes of Mage-Abominations and so on. And the First Enchanter was way over the top.
Modifié par Nimander, 12 mars 2011 - 02:19 .
#156
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 02:19
But I also think the mages were acting in duress. I mean the Templars were following a nut case who was severely oppressing them, and then invoked the right of annulment on the circle when it was an apostate who destroyed the chantry ( I don't quite understand why Anders did that...but...whatever). Anyway, not every mage is a blood mage but the majority will turn to it to stay alive when being slaughtered by Templars, whom they wouldn't otherwise have the power to fight.
Personally I have to agree with Merrill. I don't think the Blood Magic is evil, but is just feared because then the Templars wouldn't be able to control the Circle Mages.
Also, does only the Circle in Fereldan have the Litany? If the Templars were so frightened of Blood Mages you would think they would have mass produced that Litany.
#157
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 02:22
Aynslie wrote...
Also, does only the Circle in Fereldan have the Litany? If the Templars were so frightened of Blood Mages you would think they would have mass produced that Litany.
#158
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 03:00
#159
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:20
Modifié par HarlequinKing, 12 mars 2011 - 05:22 .
#160
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:21
Anyway, by now my Warden, Prince-Consort Cousland, has probably received reports about the events in Kirkwall and is petitioning the Divine in Orlais for permission to lead an Exalted March against Kirkwall. He was a devout Andrastian who gave up his relationship with Leliana only for the good of the kingdom. He's coming back, with a vengeance.
#161
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:48
QwibQwib wrote...
I just finished the game and...i don't regret siding with the mages, Meredith was totally INSANE lol
I don't regret siding with the mages, either. Anders wanted to see the emancipation of his people from a system he saw as slavery, and he acted to free them, while Meredith wanted to murder innocent mages because of the actions of one man. As a result of what Anders did, the other Circles across Thedas can free themselves from the Chantry and the Order of Templars.
#162
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:58
I honestly would have been much more inclined to side with the Templars if not for the whole Right of Annulment deal, because I do think they had a right to thoroughly investigate the situation, but I could never justify killing everyone for the deeds of a smaller group.
#163
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:59
Modifié par ToastPants, 12 mars 2011 - 05:59 .
#164
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 01:10
All my hard work trying to tell mages that Blood magic is not the answer, And what do i get? They all use blood magic in the end to transform into a fleshmonster and summoning deathrays from the sky killing even more civilians
#165
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 01:24
Then the lyrium idol just drove her insane, but she still fought it in a way. Midway through the fight with her she starts to question her sanity but then the idol pushes again and she loses to it. Just like bartrand.
#166
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 01:40
I romanced with isablella (obviously) I tried to help merril put back the elvuian... big mistake.
so long story short... i sided with the templars. only to feel very, very saddened. i didnt want to kill anders, i wanted him to run and maybe find some way to get justice out of him, he was my favourite in Awakenings reminded me of a han solo sort of guy.
Siding with the templars would not have been my first choice, considering i was a mage, but i read into a little bit of what would happen.. and i found this thread, so my first thought was "Siding with mages, bad idea." i really wanted to side with the mages but most of my companions were against it, i dont blame them either, knowing the first enchanter used blood magic to try and kill us all just made me look bad for defending him,
However! siding with the templars wasn't good either right? I mean, all the mage circles are like rebelling now right? Soooo that = bad? so my QUESTION is... what happens to the circles if i side with the mages, just so i know what to expect on my second playthrough, im already shocked as it is.
#167
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 01:49
#168
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 01:50
JamesWebster wrote...
However! siding with the templars wasn't good either right? I mean, all the mage circles are like rebelling now right? Soooo that = bad? so my QUESTION is... what happens to the circles if i side with the mages, just so i know what to expect on my second playthrough, im already shocked as it is.
I liked the ending when I sided with the mages. Merrill, Anders, Aveline, and Varric sided with me. I convinced Fenris to side with me later on when I referenced the Circle as slavery. I kept Anders with me, and Sebastian left because of that decision. In the end, the other Circles across Thedas are inspired by the act of defiance made by Hawke and the Circle mages of Kirkwall, and free themselves from Chantry and templar control. Cassandra wants Hawke to basically talk all the mages down because he's a symbol of revolution, but he's disappeared with his LI.
#169
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 02:00
#170
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 02:03
As to the enchanter turning on you, power can corrupt the best of us.
#171
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 04:09
They sided with me even though I was a Apostate Maleficar.. My brother might have had something to do with it though, being one and all. =D
#172
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 04:12
Aynslie wrote...
Personally I have to agree with Merrill. I don't think the Blood Magic is evil, but is just feared because then the Templars wouldn't be able to control the Circle Mages.
It's also feared because it's kind of gross.
#173
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 05:48
#174
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 06:46
#175
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 06:56
David Gaider wrote...
I wrote Fenris, yes. And his arguments about what happens when "the mages are in charge of themselves" are, in my mind, pretty effective with regards to those people who argue that Tevinter has it so much better. You'd be hard-pressed to find many mages there who weren't already on top of the pile who might agree... but such is human nature.
That's absurd. Tevinter isn't what happens when mages are in charge of themselves. Tevinter is what happens when mages are in charge of everyone. Advancing that argument is like looking at the barbarism of modern day African governments and saying "This is what happens when Africans are in charge of themselves." There's an overriding factor: the state. The state is the territorial right to initiate force (a definition, if you're curious, I got from the book "Guns, Germs, and Steel"). Almost anyone placed in a position that powerful is going to abuse it; mages are no different. The fact that mages given the morally dubious right to aggress against others routinely engage in such aggression does not mean that mages are evil and cannot control themselves.





Retour en haut






