? Huh? You're saying all these women look like your barbie doll, and that none of them look anything like Bioware's Morrigan? Whut...? No. There are plenty of beautiful women who look like the in-game Morrigan.Drakonnen wrote...
Yes, its all adolescent boys and their purchasing power who drive the entire market place to pick the people selected as models, be it for fashion and commercial work, mens magazines or even the girls in women's magazines. I guess they're solely the reason too Victoria's Secret fashion shows always get high ratings, lol.Wretched Gnu wrote...
Ah, I see... "classic beauty" as defined not by any known definition of the word "classic," but by the standards of teenage boys after, say, 1983 or so.Drakonnen wrote...
Oh, yes, I should go look at some classical and neo classical art, because when I said classic beauty, clearly I meant throughout every era and area of human history, rather than referring to what the classic notions are as relates to the modern world.
I have to ask, again: Who are these people -- people besides adolescents, I mean -- who find vacuous barbie-doll faces -- all with the same identical pin-button noses, the same identical Seventeen-magazine post-pubescent faces -- to be "classically beautiful"?
This is what you won't be able to get. The kind of sensibility that rejects faces with any kind of character -- explicitly calling them "unattractive", as you did the in-game Morrigan -- is not a sensibility at all. It is a knee-jerk adolescent reaction against anything that does not look like the bland, characterless, cookie-cutter adolescent that the media has convinced you is "beautiful."
The barbie-doll face has nothing to do with beauty. It is simply the absence of any particular characteristic -- coupled with a heavy dose of that "vulnerability" and "innocence" which teenage boys require because real women scare them.
If you find the in-game Morrigan "unattractive" and the barbie-doll face "attractive," I'm afraid you're suffering from this syndrome.
Modifié par Wretched Gnu, 16 novembre 2009 - 09:33 .





Retour en haut







