Why do these threads always end up being like 30+ pages long? Well almost there ... there's really not much to discuss -- Its pretty much a fact for the following:
DA2 sucks
DA2 employees caught red handed giving fake reviews
DA2 does what any major blockbuster hit does, cheat on the reviews
DA2 was made with $$ profit as primary goal, giving user a great product was a distant near the bottom of the list
Don't quote me or respond. Who the f has time to go read 1000s of words to see nonsense when at the end of the day, DA2 sucks and majority will not give a penny to EA for DA3. So Bioware, milk DA2 all you can, but you just killed what could've been a great franchise.
Opinion - Did EA bribe the Critics to give 9/10 Scores to DA2?
Débuté par
Preliatus
, mars 11 2011 09:27
Retour en haut
#177
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 07:10
Mrbananagrabber
-
- Members
- 334 messages
You can bet your ass they did. Had the game been made by an unknown developer it would have gotten 6's.
#178
Posté 21 avril 2011 - 07:16
Mrbananagrabber
-
- Members
- 334 messages
Maverick827 wrote...
I like the wave system, though I agree that it could have been implemented more gracefully. -.1Everwarden wrote...
Waves of paratroopers, bloated boss HP, three environments to explore, and a complete lack of choices having any impact upon the world.
I like bosses with more health, though then again I raided "hardcore" in World of Warcaft. This is a subjective point you mistakenly listed as objective. + .6
The repetition of environments was bad, I agree. -1
Origins didn't let you impact the world at all, either. I, personally, am able to realize the technical and narrative constraints with "choices mattering" in modern gaming, so I disagree that this is a detriment to DA2 specifically.
10 - 1.1 + .6 = 9.5!
Not that I believe the game is a 9.5 - I'd say 8.5 to 9 depending on how DLC might affect the story from here on out. I just wanted to point out how idiotic number rating systems are and how they, too, can have subjective elements. I also wanted to point out how entirely unobjective you are, despite your best attempts.
Thank God you're not a reviewer, your attempt at developing a method to rate a game is borderline retarded. Subjective amount of points taken away from a total of 100%, adding another batch of subjective amount of points to it...hey guess what, if a game has 10 flaws and 10 good things going for it IT GETS 100% ACCORDING TO YOU!
/clap
