People on the bandwagon thinking it's cool to hate on something. We've all seen it before - in many cases, yes DA2 has it's share of problems but no way in hell does it deserve that score. You're telling me it's worse than Two Worlds?
Metacritic DA:II PC score 3.9/10, Origins PC 8.3/10
Débuté par
LaughingDragon
, mars 11 2011 08:13
Retour en haut
#177
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 04:52
marcus48
-
- Members
- 23 messages
Wont be long till they lock this! lol
Seems to me alot of threads been getting locked! lol
First time ive seen this... people pissed off at bioware for a really bad game.
Seems to me alot of threads been getting locked! lol
First time ive seen this... people pissed off at bioware for a really bad game.
#178
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 04:54
Marc999
-
- Members
- 9 messages
He wasn't being sarcastic, but you're entitled to your opinion.
#180
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 04:58
da2rules1
-
- Members
- 10 messages
loves how people who don't like the game try so hard to convince people they're right
#181
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 04:59
Literateminority
-
- Members
- 98 messages
Marc999 wrote...
He wasn't being sarcastic, but you're entitled to your opinion.
Your sarcasm detector must be completely broken.
Perfect-Kenshin wrote...
You can't go trusting those metacritic reviews. Remember, it's a PROVEN FACT that ABSOLUTELY EVERYONE WHO POSTS there is from 4chan and are just trolling. At least that is the case for those who have negative things to say about DA2
That's sarcasm pure.
#182
Guest_cosgamer_*
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:06
Guest_cosgamer_*
Guest_cosgamer_*
-
- Guests
packardbell wrote...
People on the bandwagon thinking it's cool to hate on something. We've all seen it before - in many cases, yes DA2 has it's share of problems but no way in hell does it deserve that score. You're telling me it's worse than Two Worlds?
I would put them on the same lines, maybe with DA 2 a little below Two Worlds, to be honest.
#183
Guest_cosgamer_*
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:07
Guest_cosgamer_*
Guest_cosgamer_*
-
- Guests
da2rules1 wrote...
loves how people who don't like the game try so hard to convince people they're right
Fan, people aren't saying don't buy DA 2 because they want to be right. They're ticked off and venting their frustration because they've been ripped off.
#184
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:08
Alex109222
-
- Members
- 505 messages
Lol @ all the people saying "user scores don't matter!"
So player opinion is worthless? No wonder DA2 is the way it is.
So player opinion is worthless? No wonder DA2 is the way it is.
Modifié par Alex109222, 12 mars 2011 - 05:08 .
#185
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 05:12
Drakaland
-
- Members
- 12 messages
Anyone rating this game in the 3-4 range is completely unrealistic and throwing a childish tantrum. No the players spamming metacritic with such low review scores cannot be taken seriously.
#186
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 06:21
Viking_Warrior
-
- Members
- 14 messages
Drakaland wrote...
Anyone rating this game in the 3-4 range is completely unrealistic and throwing a childish tantrum. No the players spamming metacritic with such low review scores cannot be taken seriously.
From the little I have seen of the game(I haven't picked it up yet myslef), it's surly not a 0 - 4 rating.
At the same time I find it just as shocking to see it rated in the 9 - 10 range. I have not played a 10/10 game yet.
#187
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 06:24
Froody42
-
- Members
- 52 messages
Even if player ratings don't matter, it is notable that the professional rating is steadily falling as well. It's now at 81 for Xbox and 82 for PS3. I think both scores used to be at 84 not long ago. For a Bioware game, those are extremely low scores.
#188
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 06:33
Monica83
-
- Members
- 1 849 messages
EA have always high ratings also in theyr bad games.... Corious don't you think?
Anyways in the rank of 10 i can give to dragon age 2 a 6.5... Too many roleplay elements stripped...An horrible design and animations...More responsive combat i have do admit..But static classed and very boring story... The game feels rushed and i really don't like the years skip of time...
Anyways in the rank of 10 i can give to dragon age 2 a 6.5... Too many roleplay elements stripped...An horrible design and animations...More responsive combat i have do admit..But static classed and very boring story... The game feels rushed and i really don't like the years skip of time...
#189
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 06:35
Melness
-
- Members
- 756 messages
According to user score, Dragon Age: Origins is an 83. I expected more from BioWare.
#190
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 06:44
Chreleth
-
- Members
- 33 messages
Yawn... a bunch of nerds who care too much spam a load of identical low-scored reviews and that's somehow evidence this is an inferior game?
Within 8hrs of release there were 100+ reviews scoring lower than 4. People aren't playing this with an open mind.
As someone who's put over 1000 hours into the BG series I honestly prefer DAII. Origins was extremely disappointing when I first played it but it did become one of my favourite games. Apart from a bit of awkwardness in combat sometimes (team mates not staying when using hold position, ranged guys running into the middle of a melée to fire at people behind) I can't think of many ways Origins was better.
Within 8hrs of release there were 100+ reviews scoring lower than 4. People aren't playing this with an open mind.
As someone who's put over 1000 hours into the BG series I honestly prefer DAII. Origins was extremely disappointing when I first played it but it did become one of my favourite games. Apart from a bit of awkwardness in combat sometimes (team mates not staying when using hold position, ranged guys running into the middle of a melée to fire at people behind) I can't think of many ways Origins was better.
#192
Posté 12 mars 2011 - 07:17
Statulos
-
- Members
- 2 967 messages
My two cents as pc player:
-I like the general plot. I like personal stories (Planescape is my fave PC RPG so...) and I like well developed characters but here I see no actual posibilities to change my companion´s views. In DA:O you could create huge doubts in your companions by means of your actions and words. Leliana and Alistair were very clear cases, but Morrigan and even Sten to some extent could change their views a bit thanks to you. I feel this is absent in DA 2.
-In DA:O your actions could change a lot, a huge lot in the world. I´m not going to spoil anything from DA 2 but in here, I have the feeling that I am more of a privileged spectator than an actual force in those events. I don´t really understand why Cassandra is so obssessed with Hawke; because I have the feeling that I did nothing, I was just besides the people who did.
-I´m not really obsessed with the crunchies (yes, I´m an old time tabletop RPG player) and the inventory simplification was not that bad. What feels bad is that the series had a relatively realistic approach to combat in aesthetical terms. Sure you could do some awesome things, but not the Devil May Cry style of movements.
-Why transfering? All the impact I am getting is just a couple codex entries and a couple conversations. That´s all.
You guys in Bioware did it right in ME 2: Wrex being alive made a real difference, the concil being alive made a difference, loosing Alenko or Ash made a difference. Here what my warden did is purely flavour, not difference.
-I like the general plot. I like personal stories (Planescape is my fave PC RPG so...) and I like well developed characters but here I see no actual posibilities to change my companion´s views. In DA:O you could create huge doubts in your companions by means of your actions and words. Leliana and Alistair were very clear cases, but Morrigan and even Sten to some extent could change their views a bit thanks to you. I feel this is absent in DA 2.
-In DA:O your actions could change a lot, a huge lot in the world. I´m not going to spoil anything from DA 2 but in here, I have the feeling that I am more of a privileged spectator than an actual force in those events. I don´t really understand why Cassandra is so obssessed with Hawke; because I have the feeling that I did nothing, I was just besides the people who did.
-I´m not really obsessed with the crunchies (yes, I´m an old time tabletop RPG player) and the inventory simplification was not that bad. What feels bad is that the series had a relatively realistic approach to combat in aesthetical terms. Sure you could do some awesome things, but not the Devil May Cry style of movements.
-Why transfering? All the impact I am getting is just a couple codex entries and a couple conversations. That´s all.
You guys in Bioware did it right in ME 2: Wrex being alive made a real difference, the concil being alive made a difference, loosing Alenko or Ash made a difference. Here what my warden did is purely flavour, not difference.
