Areksu wrote...
Hmm, lets see: He willing killed hundreds of humanitarian aid workers when the only target necessary for his operation was the head priest. He continually wined about how bad this action was before doing it, so its not like he was all glowy eyed Vengeance while doing this. Either his mind has been so messed up by Vengeance that he has no semblance of morality left or he did this willingly. In either case, he is beyond any help and does so much collateral damage to people completely unrelated to the conflict that keeping him alive is not an option for a moral character.
Perhaps it's just me, but I seem to recall meeting refugees in Darktown complaining about the fact that the Chantry never came down there to help them...
Also, when you meet sisters in Lowtown, they are either asking prostitutes to make donnations to the Chantry, and/or spreading the "word of Andraste".
If they are the "humanitarian aid workers" you claim them to be, they are doing a very poor job at that.
Whereas Anders spent a decade caring for patients and refugees in his clinic for free, and working in collaboration with Lirene (who was trying to find them jobs, food, and other resources). So, as far as "humanitarian aid" goes, I think Anders could easily teach them holy sisters a thing or two about how it's done.
As for those claims that Anders killed hundreds of people... I would really love for Gaider or anyone else who wrote that story to give us the actual numbers regarding how many people were present in the Chantry when the light show started. Not that it would make such a huge difference whether Anders sacrificed 5, or 100 lives to his cause. But still, I'd like to know.
Killing Elthina alone may have been useless since one of her subordonates could have taken the mantle of Grand Cleric until a new one would have been officially appointed by the Divine. And, by doing so, prevent Meredith from invoking the Right of Annulment, thus preventing the revolution from ever occuring.
By targetting the whole Chantry, it gave the possibility for Meredith to automatically assume control of the city and declare the RoA on the Circle, forcing all mages in Kirkwall into a "fight, flee, or die" situation. So anything smaller than that could have made Anders' plan fail.
Still, you have the right to disagree with Anders' motives and/or the means he took to achieve them.
However, declaring that keeping him alive is not an option for a moral character makes no sense to me.
Say that I believed, for a moment there, that he deserved to "pay" for what he's done.
I'd rather he lived with the knowledge of the lives he took (something that will possibly keep haunting him until the end of his days), and face the consequences, good and bad, of his actions. Have him take full responsibility for what he did instead of offering him the easy way out, and giving him the satisfaction of dying for his cause.
Also, even if I had been in complete disagreement with him; I'm thinking that, after all the good he has done, Anders deserves at the very least a shot at redemption.
Fenris has slaughtered in cold blood the entire tribe that nursed him back to health... Sten an entire family (including the children) because he had misplaced his sword... Zevran was an assassin and has even admitted that sometimes, innocent bystanders can get in the way (not to mention that his "marks" probably weren't all evildoers)...
Most of our companions have done terrible things at some point or another in their lives, yet none of them had motivations that were as selfless and noble as Anders (no matter how misguided or delusional some may claim them to be, the fact remains that Anders motives stem from his desire to ensure that mages, one day, would be given the chance to share the same rights and privileges as any other man).
So, if his rebellion succeeds and mages indeed acquire the right to be free from Chantry oversight as a result of it, living in peace with the rest of the population, loving and raising families of their own, I think that it would be fair for him to be there to see the "new world" he helped create, and take credit for it.
But, if his actions only result in more deaths and slaughter, with mages only being more feared, hated, and mercilessly hunted down... It would also be justice for him to see the horrors and desolation his actions caused.
I do not claim that this is the most "moral" approach, but I believe that as far as "morality" goes, it is a valid one.