98 réponses à ce sujet

[Ixalmaris]

Jedra101 wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Russalka wrote...

Was there not a troll call to spam negative reviews?

There was also a call from Bioware in russia to spam positive reviews.

Lol - I would make sure your door is locked after that comment!

http://social.biowar...-6478121-1.html

[Russalka]

You do realise that just disproves any point you have made?

[Fiery Specter]

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

 The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

You're all claims and nothing else.

Where is your evidence? 

Anyone with a lick of sense understands this.  Do you think EA will give  companies like OXM exclusives if they trash a game like this?  Seriously?  No, they give the exclusives to the companies who are willing to play ball.  And which magazines sell best, the ones get the early info.
I know you're getting all butt hurt, especially since you only joined this forum so you could wave the DA2 flag and all, but you need to get over the fact that your precious game is third rate quality.  The sooner you realize this the better off we'll all be.
Now run along before you embarrass yourself further.  

EVIDENCE, NOT CRAP.

You do realize that if you had read the thread instead of following me around like an angry fanboy puppy you'd realize that the OP lists what your looking for.

No, you see, idiot, that doesn't work here.

YOUR CLAIM IS THAT BIOWARE HAS PAID REVIEWERS.

Lol, poor little boy with no reading comprehension.  I never said that.  I said monetary pressure were responsible for the inflatable review scores.  There is a difference.  Once you get a job you may understand.
Anyway, do you parents know you're up this late?

[Keele]

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

 The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

You're all claims and nothing else.

Where is your evidence? 

Anyone with a lick of sense understands this.  Do you think EA will give  companies like OXM exclusives if they trash a game like this?  Seriously?  No, they give the exclusives to the companies who are willing to play ball.  And which magazines sell best, the ones get the early info.
I know you're getting all butt hurt, especially since you only joined this forum so you could wave the DA2 flag and all, but you need to get over the fact that your precious game is third rate quality.  The sooner you realize this the better off we'll all be.
Now run along before you embarrass yourself further.  

EVIDENCE, NOT CRAP.

You do realize that if you had read the thread instead of following me around like an angry fanboy puppy you'd realize that the OP lists what your looking for.

No, you see, idiot, that doesn't work here.

YOUR CLAIM IS THAT BIOWARE HAS PAID REVIEWERS.

Lol, poor little boy with no reading comprehension.  I never said that.  I said monetary pressure were responsible for the inflatable review scores.  There is a difference.  Once you get a job you may understand.
Anyway, do you parents know you're up this late?

WHY DON'T YOU READ YOUR OWN DAMN QUOTE YOU STUPID IMBECILE!

''THIS GAME''

YOU MOTHER****ER!

Modifié par Keele, 12 mars 2011 - 11:05 .

[Fiery Specter]

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

 The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

You're all claims and nothing else.

Where is your evidence? 

Anyone with a lick of sense understands this.  Do you think EA will give  companies like OXM exclusives if they trash a game like this?  Seriously?  No, they give the exclusives to the companies who are willing to play ball.  And which magazines sell best, the ones get the early info.
I know you're getting all butt hurt, especially since you only joined this forum so you could wave the DA2 flag and all, but you need to get over the fact that your precious game is third rate quality.  The sooner you realize this the better off we'll all be.
Now run along before you embarrass yourself further.  

EVIDENCE, NOT CRAP.

You do realize that if you had read the thread instead of following me around like an angry fanboy puppy you'd realize that the OP lists what your looking for.

No, you see, idiot, that doesn't work here.

YOUR CLAIM IS THAT BIOWARE HAS PAID REVIEWERS.

Lol, poor little boy with no reading comprehension.  I never said that.  I said monetary pressure were responsible for the inflatable review scores.  There is a difference.  Once you get a job you may understand.
Anyway, do you parents know you're up this late?

WHY DON'T YOU READ YOUR OWN DAMN QUOTE YOU STUPID IMBECILE!

''THIS GAME''

YOU MOTHER****ER!

Lol, so angry for someone who has such a clumsy grasp of the English language.

Edit:  And this what started your little tantrum:  The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

Modifié par Fiery Specter, 12 mars 2011 - 11:09 .

[Lusitanum]

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

So being right is a democracy now? Popularity is a way to judge quality? Do I even need to say what's wrong with that idea?

[Keele]

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

 The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

You're all claims and nothing else.

Where is your evidence? 

Anyone with a lick of sense understands this.  Do you think EA will give  companies like OXM exclusives if they trash a game like this?  Seriously?  No, they give the exclusives to the companies who are willing to play ball.  And which magazines sell best, the ones get the early info.
I know you're getting all butt hurt, especially since you only joined this forum so you could wave the DA2 flag and all, but you need to get over the fact that your precious game is third rate quality.  The sooner you realize this the better off we'll all be.
Now run along before you embarrass yourself further.  

EVIDENCE, NOT CRAP.

You do realize that if you had read the thread instead of following me around like an angry fanboy puppy you'd realize that the OP lists what your looking for.

No, you see, idiot, that doesn't work here.

YOUR CLAIM IS THAT BIOWARE HAS PAID REVIEWERS.

Lol, poor little boy with no reading comprehension.  I never said that.  I said monetary pressure were responsible for the inflatable review scores.  There is a difference.  Once you get a job you may understand.
Anyway, do you parents know you're up this late?

WHY DON'T YOU READ YOUR OWN DAMN QUOTE YOU STUPID IMBECILE!

''THIS GAME''

YOU MOTHER****ER!

Lol, so angry for someone who has such a clumsy grasp of the English language.

''Okay, we've established that you're ineffective in an argument, and thus resort to name calling. Can we move on?''

We're done.

Modifié par Keele, 12 mars 2011 - 11:11 .

[Ixalmaris]

Lusitanum wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

So being right is a democracy now? Popularity is a way to judge quality? Do I even need to say what's wrong with that idea?

All reviews come down to popularity. The only difference to user scores is that you limit the number of voices you listen to.

Keele wrote...
''Okay, we've established that you're ineffective in an argument, and thus resort to name calling. Can we move on?''

I don't see where he called you anything. He just pointed out that you
1. are angry
2. don't speak english perfectly

Modifié par Ixalmaris, 12 mars 2011 - 11:12 .

[epiccrabs]

Lusitanum wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

So being right is a democracy now? Popularity is a way to judge quality? Do I even need to say what's wrong with that idea?

Yes that is how the world works. Consider this for one moment,  you're sitting on a chair and using a table but you can use a table for a chair likewise you can use the chair for a table but why do they call them different names? Because of the general consensus. 

[Fiery Specter]

Ixalmaris wrote...

Lusitanum wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

So being right is a democracy now? Popularity is a way to judge quality? Do I even need to say what's wrong with that idea?

All reviews come down to popularity. The only difference to user scores is that you limit the number of voices you listen to.

Good, because I really thought you were gonna have an aneurysm.

[Keele]

Ixalmaris wrote...

Lusitanum wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

So being right is a democracy now? Popularity is a way to judge quality? Do I even need to say what's wrong with that idea?

All reviews come down to popularity. The only difference to user scores is that you limit the number of voices you listen to.

Keele wrote...
''Okay, we've established that you're ineffective in an argument, and thus resort to name calling. Can we move on?''

I don't see where he called you anything. He just pointed out that you
1. are angry
2. don't speak english perfectly

It's called nitpicking, Jr.

[Lusitanum]

Ixalmaris wrote...

All reviews come down to popularity.
The only difference to user scores is that you limit the number of
voices you listen to.

And in what way is that better? Or proof that their judgment is preferable over "professional" reviewers?

epiccrabs wrote...

Yes that is how the world works. Consider this for one moment,  you're sitting on a chair and using a table but you can use a table for a chair likewise you can use the chair for a table but why do they call them different names? Because of the general consensus.

OK, seriously, if you don't know what the hell you're talking about, just shut up.

The term you use for an object has nothing to do with with its quality, which is what we're discussing here. Could you please try to stay on topic?

Not to mention that language is affected by what professionals linguistics might have to say on the matter. Right now, here on Portugal, we're even going through a reshaping of the way we write (like cutting the "C" in words where the sound isn't there) and that's something that happens to every language. Why? Because professionals studied the subject and then stated that some aspects of a given language are obsolete. And then people have to alter the way they speak their language, regardless of how many people use it in a given way at a given time.

Modifié par Lusitanum, 12 mars 2011 - 11:23 .

[Suron]

no. the FACT is EVERYONE here sides with the one they agree with and it's on a per-game basis.

if the user reviews are akin to your thoughts on a game you say "see professionals are bought out"
if the professional reviews are akin to your thoughts on a game you say "see user reviews are biased and skewed by haters to lower the number)

give it up.

BioWare did a lot of good and a lot of bad with DA2.

one such good, imo (even though I miss the actual CHOICE), was having a more focused characater.
on such bad, imo (and I can't see how anyone can really argue this), is the copy-paste+musical chairs the path-blocking boulders on location maps.

[Lotion Soronarr]

Keele, please....

It's common sense and knowledge how magazines and review sites work. Money makes the world go round.
If you ever get a real job, you might now what it means to work for a living and have bosses breathing down your neck.
Magazines get money from advertising and exclusives. It's publishers like EA that pay for advertising space and it is they who give exclusives. A conflict on interests clearly exist. This a plain and simple fact.

I don't see what you hope to gain from denying reality.

[Ixalmaris]

Lusitanum wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

All reviews come down to popularity.
The only difference to user scores is that you limit the number of
voices you listen to.

And in what way is that better? Or prove that their judgment is preferable over "professional" reviewers?

As I have shown, professional reviewers are financially dependant on the publishers. The publishers know this and use this pressure to force good scores (Kane&Lynch and the Gothic 3 tests in Germany for example).
User reviews are more subjective than professional reviews, but the large number of them means that in the end the rage raviews get drowned out by honest ones. It is also much harder for publishers anf haters to manipulate the large number of user reviews.

[z900]

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

 The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

You're all claims and nothing else.

Where is your evidence? 

Anyone with a lick of sense understands this.  Do you think EA will give  companies like OXM exclusives if they trash a game like this?  Seriously?  No, they give the exclusives to the companies who are willing to play ball.  And which magazines sell best, the ones get the early info.
I know you're getting all butt hurt, especially since you only joined this forum so you could wave the DA2 flag and all, but you need to get over the fact that your precious game is third rate quality.  The sooner you realize this the better off we'll all be.
Now run along before you embarrass yourself further.  

EVIDENCE, NOT CRAP.

You do realize that if you had read the thread instead of following me around like an angry fanboy puppy you'd realize that the OP lists what your looking for.

No, you see, idiot, that doesn't work here.

YOUR CLAIM IS THAT BIOWARE HAS PAID REVIEWERS.

Lol, poor little boy with no reading comprehension.  I never said that.  I said monetary pressure were responsible for the inflatable review scores.  There is a difference.  Once you get a job you may understand.
Anyway, do you parents know you're up this late?

WHY DON'T YOU READ YOUR OWN DAMN QUOTE YOU STUPID IMBECILE!

''THIS GAME''

YOU MOTHER****ER!

Lol, so angry for someone who has such a clumsy grasp of the English language.

Edit:  And this what started your little tantrum:  The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

Yep.
And that's why I hate people from my own country. It's apparently too hard for them to grasp the concepts of grammar or netiquette.
Keele va a farti fottere.

[epiccrabs]

Lusitanum wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

All reviews come down to popularity.
The only difference to user scores is that you limit the number of
voices you listen to.

And in what way is that better? Or proof that their judgment is preferable over "professional" reviewers?

epiccrabs wrote...

Yes that is how the world works. Consider this for one moment,  you're sitting on a chair and using a table but you can use a table for a chair likewise you can use the chair for a table but why do they call them different names? Because of the general consensus.

OK, seriously, if you don't know what the hell you're talking about, just shut up.

The term you use for an object has nothing to do with with its quality, which is what we're discussing here. Could you please try to stay on topic?

Not to mention that language is affected by what professionals linguistics might have to say on the matter. Right now, here on Portugal, we're even going through a reshaping of the way we write (like cutting the "C" in words where the sound isn't there) and that's something that happens to every language. Why? Because professionals studied the subject and then stated that some aspects of a given language are obsolete. And then people have to alter the way they speak their language, regardless of how many people use it in a given way at a given time.

We're not stating scientific facts here. You fail to undestand what I was implying so I'll have to reexplain it once more. Things that are generally good are generally praised by people and then joined to a single group or in this case we'll call "Excellent games". Naturally successors of this "excellent games" are supposed to improve not the other way around which happened here in this case. Dragon Age 2 though a good game fails to improve over it's predecessor hence the reason for it's infamity. When making a sequel you're not supposed to make a step back. Which are you supposed to believe? A guy who thinks the game is the bestest ever (professional reviews) or those who actually played the game and think it's a step back. Do note, don't blame this on raids etc... Please do remember that ONLY Dragon Age 2 in the long list of bioware games received this much negativity. This is a sign that the game is indeed crap because of its popularity decided by the masses not the reviewers. A chair is called a chair because a lot of people call it a chair, a single so called "professional" won't change its name.

[keyip]

Ixalmaris wrote...

Because the job of professional reviewers depend on their employer making money. And the make money when gaming publishers buy advertisments and give exclusive material to them, which they won't do when their multi million dollar game gets a bad review.

I happen to agree with you, unfortunately when most people see the word 'user review' they automatically think of
'scores given to a game by the gaming public' which are about as uselessas you can get. The idea of a user poll scoring the game is a waste of space and a ridiculous idea.

User reviews, that is customers writing an article discussing what they thought about the game are the most useful feedback a person can get about a game. If I had listened to consumer thoughts about Red Dead Redemption, I would have known that the game is one of the buggiest in existence. Something never mentioned in any of the magazine hype articles that were produced. I would have then been prepared when the game kept crashing my PS3 after every 20mins and I would have saved myself a whole ****load of frustration.

However, scores in general are useless. People (and when I say people I'm mainly talking about youngsters here) tend to vote with emotion rather than properly weighing up the pros and cons of the game and scoring in an objective and unbiased manner. People (and again I'm talking mainly about youngsters here) tend to be melodramatic and if they hate the game then obviously the game is crap and they'll vote as low as they can possibly go. The criteria of voting is different for each person so, for example, someone may give Dragon Age Origins a 5 out of 10 because they are a graphic **** but you wouldn't know that from score. People may have ulterior motives, something which can be discerned from a review but not from a score. And the list goes on and on.

Overall, people should trust community input on a game more than articles written by a professional, that being said people should treat community polls scoring a game with the contempt it deserves. A ridiculous pratice which tells a person nothing.

Modifié par keyip, 12 mars 2011 - 11:36 .

[TheGreatStalin]

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

And this is why your bourgeoise 'democracy' fails!! Society is best when it is run by those who know what is best!! So it is too with games; those review sites are professional!! If they say DA2 is awesome, they are right and nothing the filthy individualist pigs can say will change that!!

[epiccrabs]

TheGreatStalin wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

And this is why your bourgeoise 'democracy' fails!! Society is best when it is run by those who know what is best!! So it is too with games; those review sites are professional!! If they say DA2 is awesome, they are right and nothing the filthy individualist pigs can say will change that!!

Yeah and when this so called professional "accidentally" reviewed a game bad they get fired. Kane and Lynch, OOOPS guess you can't rely on these so called professionals all the time.

[Jedra101]

Suron wrote...

no. the FACT is EVERYONE here sides with the one they agree with and it's on a per-game basis.

if the user reviews are akin to your thoughts on a game you say "see professionals are bought out"
if the professional reviews are akin to your thoughts on a game you say "see user reviews are biased and skewed by haters to lower the number).

Hmm, when you are taken away for two (sometimes more) days, given lavish gifts and treated better than in the best hotels, just to 'introduce' you to the game before you play it, it is hard not to then bear this in mind when you write a review.  Also, when your publication suddenly recieves notice that regular advertising committments are no longer going to be taken up after you gave a poor critique of a game, then it is hard not to allow this to affect your future reviews.

It is a big bad world, and should people rely on reviews for their opinions then they need to bear in mind the motivations of the people writing those reviews.  That goes for both professional and forum reviews.  All in all there is a balance, but you have to find it yourself.

[Keele]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Keele, please....

It's common sense and knowledge how magazines and review sites work. Money makes the world go round.
If you ever get a real job, you might now what it means to work for a living and have bosses breathing down your neck.
Magazines get money from advertising and exclusives. It's publishers like EA that pay for advertising space and it is they who give exclusives. A conflict on interests clearly exist. This a plain and simple fact.

I don't see what you hope to gain from denying reality.

If this is such a plain and simple fact, then can you be so kind as to P-R-O-V-E it? He couldn't, you can't. 

The only thing that you two are good for, and any of the people on YOUR side, are opening your mouth and spouting meaningless nonsense that nobody, especially me, wants to hear.

I asked for CONCRETE EVIDENCE, and all I've gotten so far, and no doubt WILL continue to get is ****. ****. ****. ****.

So please, save your mid life crisis story about your hardships in working at McDonald's to somebody that's willing to give a crap. Such as your psychiatrist, for example.

The low down is this: You either present me something solid, or you just STFU, okay?

Modifié par Keele, 12 mars 2011 - 11:42 .

[epiccrabs]

Keele wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Keele, please....

It's common sense and knowledge how magazines and review sites work. Money makes the world go round.
If you ever get a real job, you might now what it means to work for a living and have bosses breathing down your neck.
Magazines get money from advertising and exclusives. It's publishers like EA that pay for advertising space and it is they who give exclusives. A conflict on interests clearly exist. This a plain and simple fact.

I don't see what you hope to gain from denying reality.

If this is such a plain and simple fact, then can you be so kind as to P-R-O-V-E it? He couldn't, you can't. 

The only thing that you two are good for, and any of the people on YOUR side, are opening your mouth and spouting meaningless nonsense that nobody, especially me, wants to hear.

I asked for CONCRETE EVIDENCE, and all I've gotten so far, and no doubt WILL continue to get is ****. ****. ****. ****.

So please, save your mid life crisis story about your hardships in working at McDonald's to somebody that's willing to give a crap. Such as your psychiatrist, for example.

The low down is this: You either present me something solid, or you just STFU, okay?

*cough* Kane and Lynch *cough*

[Ixalmaris]

epiccrabs wrote...

TheGreatStalin wrote...

Ixalmaris wrote...

Saphara wrote...

And the problem with users reviews are they are just as subjective and dependant on that person's taste.

Really unless something is pretty much universally panned (FF14) I'm probably going to ignore it. Same with the excessive positive reviews.

And the subjective opinion of thousands of customers is a good indication of the quality of the game. Thats how polls work (yes, including scientific ones) and democracies work by asking all people to state their opinion instead of relying on a few "professional electors".

And this is why your bourgeoise 'democracy' fails!! Society is best when it is run by those who know what is best!! So it is too with games; those review sites are professional!! If they say DA2 is awesome, they are right and nothing the filthy individualist pigs can say will change that!!

Yeah and when this so called professional "accidentally" reviewed a game bad they get fired. Kane and Lynch, OOOPS guess you can't rely on these so called professionals all the time.

Look on his username. Then you will understand.

@Stalin. Good one. Subtile and funny.

[Keele]

z900 wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

Keele wrote...

Fiery Specter wrote...

 The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

You're all claims and nothing else.

Where is your evidence? 

Anyone with a lick of sense understands this.  Do you think EA will give  companies like OXM exclusives if they trash a game like this?  Seriously?  No, they give the exclusives to the companies who are willing to play ball.  And which magazines sell best, the ones get the early info.
I know you're getting all butt hurt, especially since you only joined this forum so you could wave the DA2 flag and all, but you need to get over the fact that your precious game is third rate quality.  The sooner you realize this the better off we'll all be.
Now run along before you embarrass yourself further.  

EVIDENCE, NOT CRAP.

You do realize that if you had read the thread instead of following me around like an angry fanboy puppy you'd realize that the OP lists what your looking for.

No, you see, idiot, that doesn't work here.

YOUR CLAIM IS THAT BIOWARE HAS PAID REVIEWERS.

Lol, poor little boy with no reading comprehension.  I never said that.  I said monetary pressure were responsible for the inflatable review scores.  There is a difference.  Once you get a job you may understand.
Anyway, do you parents know you're up this late?

WHY DON'T YOU READ YOUR OWN DAMN QUOTE YOU STUPID IMBECILE!

''THIS GAME''

YOU MOTHER****ER!

Lol, so angry for someone who has such a clumsy grasp of the English language.

Edit:  And this what started your little tantrum:  The sad thing is that many of the fanboys on this site will ever admit that reviewers are giving good scores to this game because of monetary pressure.

Yep.
And that's why I hate people from my own country. It's apparently too hard for them to grasp the concepts of grammar or netiquette.
Keele va a farti fottere.

Give me one good reason as to why I should respect this guy.