Crawling_Chaos wrote...
Right, so you're perfectly OK with a super violent game, but once you get a bare nipple in there... WHOA too far.
Because he has INTEGRITY.
Crawling_Chaos wrote...
Right, so you're perfectly OK with a super violent game, but once you get a bare nipple in there... WHOA too far.
Um...really? Integrity is choosing a set of values and sticking to them. Integrity is being true to one's self and to others. Integrity does not mean, "having conservative and/or Christian values." Integrity does not mean, "thinking that sex is bad and dirty and that the human body is evil and must remain hidden." A person living by a different set of values than you do does not mean they lack integrity. It only means that they don't share your value system, which is 100% fine.Maria Caliban wrote...
Crawling_Chaos wrote...
Right, so you're perfectly OK with a super violent game, but once you get a bare nipple in there... WHOA too far.
Because he has INTEGRITY.
Modifié par Dex1701, 19 novembre 2009 - 01:24 .
Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*
Maria Caliban wrote...
Crawling_Chaos wrote...
Right, so you're perfectly OK with a super violent game, but once you get a bare nipple in there... WHOA too far.
Because he has INTEGRITY.
Modifié par X106, 19 novembre 2009 - 02:27 .
Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*
starwind99 wrote...
Dont know if its been said but its already out.
Mordaedil wrote...
I would have thought respect would have been earned from making this game in the first place. But just as you think respect is earned, remember that such a thing is a two-way street. Spitting in their faces isn't going to elicit extra respect from the developers either.
Could it, perchance be related to the fact that Stanley Woo had nothing to do with the latter?
But I digress, getting to reasoning with you is just going to prove insufferable.
Modifié par Kelston, 19 novembre 2009 - 02:14 .
Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*
kroosaydur wrote...
i also think it was wierd that in the sex scene there doing it right in the middle of the camp for everyone to see. even the dialogue said that it was in a tent but it shows it out in the middle of the camp.
SheffSteel wrote...
Sex sells... and apparently leaves the customer feeling vaguely dissatisfied, and perhaps rather uncomfortable, afterwards.
It doesn't get much more adult than that.
Sarakinoi wrote...
Sorry if this has been said before, there are 16 pages and I won't even try to read it all... But does it bother anyone that Morigan has no bra at all while walking in public (70% of it is visible on the sides), but she puts one on in the sex scenes?
evmiller wrote...
People buy rated R DVD's with love scenes that show partial nudity all the time without any debate. Why the big discussion having it in something like Dragon Age. Both are rated 17+
Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*
Malkav42 wrote...
Just thought this needed to be reposted as it is the the most intelligent post in the topic, and in my opinion is the last word on the subject.SheffSteel wrote...
Sex sells... and apparently leaves the customer feeling vaguely dissatisfied, and perhaps rather uncomfortable, afterwards.
It doesn't get much more adult than that.
Exactly.Suprez30 wrote...
I keep thinking how they could have done it ... No need to show ****** or ass .. But don't show either the underwear.It's just feel strange to see moriggan orgasm with her bra and panties on.
ANGLE ANGLE!! Movie have done it for YEARS.
Acemath wrote...
Is this thread stll open?This won't get us anywhere.There are people pro adult patching and people against it.It's always been like that and always will be like that...
Modifié par TheMadCat, 19 novembre 2009 - 03:50 .