Godeshus wrote...
For many this could be a healthy early start to exploration. Film has a more visceral approach to sex, and often seems to push this idea towards the younger generation. I doubt some of you would be happy at seeing male/male sex in detail. But again, for younger, less experienced people who are questioning their own sexuality, this tamed down approach could be just what they need.
For those who are more comfortable with themselves, there are other avenues that denote the raw power of sex.
I know I will get attacked for saying the following, but please...before you do so, take a second to think about what I am writing. And remember, it is a matter of opinion. Also, when I say "they" and "people", I am not actually including everyone.
I think the older people who really strongly want to see more nudity and rawer sex scenes in DA are people who have their priorities confused. They have delved into the fantasy realm of a video game a little too deeply and seek to draw reality into it. The reality, however, is that sex, and I mean Real sex, is all around us. These people should consider seeking sex in the real world rather than trying to experience it through their characters.
The magic is in the bedroom, not on a computer monitor.
I'm not attacking you as a reply here, just responding.

I honestly believe that you are inadvertantly putting up a strawman argument. Honestly, I do not think you are purposefully misrepresenting people BUT I do think you are inferring motivation where none is implied.
By that I mean that many of us are not seeking sex be added to the game. It is already in there, as sold. Many of us wish that the way the one scene was done was less ridiculous. This includes most of that many being absolutely fine if it had been fade to black.
Do you understand that? Can you step outside of your preconceived notion that people who are saying the scene was done badly, even those who are arguing that nudity should have been shown, are not by default people who are seeking sexual pleasure from a video game?
I am assuming that you accept that people playing video games where they kill people, torture people, steal stuff from people, and do large amounts of property damage ARE NOT people who want to do that in real life.
Or are you going off the oft-quoted cliche notion that people who are angry and want to hurt others use video games to vent their violence in safe ways? If so (and I'm sure this is true sometimes for some people) what WOULD be wrong with someone seeking sexual release from a video game (or porn) as compared to going out and cheating on their SO or spouse, or who are unable to get a date, or would otherwise be paying for a prostitute? This is a separate issue, and I apologize to everyone for derailing the thread a bit but - why is it automatically assumed that a sex game is worse than a violence game? How lame is the argument against Rock Band that "if you want to play an instrument, play a real instrument and not a game one" or even worse "why steal stuff or kill fake people in a game when you can do it for real"?
That digression aside -
I reiterate - many of us want the ALREADY INCLUDED intimate encounter in a game where there are plenty of other RISQUE MOMENTS AND CONTENT to be done in A LESS AWFUL WAY.
A way that could include camera angles, or a fade to black skipping the scene entirely.
Why is it that everyone who decides that we who are complaining about the ugly, unrealistic underware ignore the many, many times we say we would be happier with camera angles or fade to blacks? Is it because it destroys your worldview that says those who accept or want nudity in video games MUST be perverted, dateless, friendless teenagers?