yes/360
Survey: do you think DA2 is an improvement?
Débuté par
jbanchiere
, mars 13 2011 02:16
Retour en haut
#231
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 09:55
2Hard2C
-
- Members
- 97 messages
Combat is a bit better, not amazingly so. Story/companions overall good not great. Tries to hard.
No
360
Still a pretty good game, not a heap of crap as others make it out to be, but not good enough for Day 1 Paid DLC either.
No
360
Still a pretty good game, not a heap of crap as others make it out to be, but not good enough for Day 1 Paid DLC either.
#232
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 09:58
Bhatair
-
- Members
- 3 749 messages
No
PC
Though to be fair, I do enjoy DA2 as a game, but as a sequel to Origins it falls short.
PC
Though to be fair, I do enjoy DA2 as a game, but as a sequel to Origins it falls short.
#234
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 10:06
CaseySmith
-
- Members
- 1 messages
No,
was obviously rushed. I now consider Bioware the money milking right-arm of EA.
PC
was obviously rushed. I now consider Bioware the money milking right-arm of EA.
PC
#235
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 10:06
Kritanakom
-
- Members
- 281 messages
There is no poll. I was promised a "survey". The poll is a lie.
#236
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 10:07
byzantine horse
-
- Members
- 359 messages
Some worse, some better. +-0 for me, still enjoyable as hell just like Origins was, only in a different way.
#240
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 10:31
Squeam
-
- Members
- 51 messages
No.
And as of this post, 141 NO and 66 YES. If you want to know platform, count it yourself.
And as of this post, 141 NO and 66 YES. If you want to know platform, count it yourself.
#242
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 10:37
Gfan24
-
- Members
- 87 messages
Yes, PS3(would be PC if they allowed gamepad support and an autoattack toggle) they took a great core, and STREAMLINED it, not dumbed it down. Combat mas probably the weakest thing about DAO and they fixed it. Is it as epic.....no? But how many time can you save the world in a given fictional universe. A smaller scope lends it self to deeper player characters and interaction and more detail-->(see Shogun Total War 2).
I can understand some who really loved BG not liking the new direction. Well, rpgs need not have secondary combat just because they are an rpg. Yes this is a role playing game and such, the #1 goal is to role play BUT fun combat actually helps immerse you more into your character.
In summary, yes, I think they improved it alot.
I can understand some who really loved BG not liking the new direction. Well, rpgs need not have secondary combat just because they are an rpg. Yes this is a role playing game and such, the #1 goal is to role play BUT fun combat actually helps immerse you more into your character.
In summary, yes, I think they improved it alot.
Modifié par Gfan24, 13 mars 2011 - 10:38 .
#245
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 10:48
arathor_87
-
- Members
- 394 messages
No no no no no / PC
Pretty shocking to see how many who have said no here.
Pretty shocking to see how many who have said no here.
#250
Posté 13 mars 2011 - 11:14
enrogae
-
- Members
- 29 messages
I do not think it is as simple as a "yes" or "no". Some aspects are an improvement, some are a detrimental step backward. If I had to make a generalized quantification as to whether this game is better or worse than the last, I would have to say worse.
So I guess I'm a no.
PC.
So I guess I'm a no.
PC.
