855 réponses à ce sujet

[Dimvou]

Tottaly NO!! Less RPG elements...Its just hack'n'slash now...

PC

[AngryFrozenWater]

No.
PC.

(Finished the game).

[Andronic0s]

Yes (barely) PC

[JRidden]

no
it's a backward
PS3 user

[RogNasty]

No
PC

[Deylar]

No

PS3

[rvgifford]

No.

PS3

Decent, but not great. Clearly rushed, needed more time, then might have been great.

Modifié par rvgifford, 15 mars 2011 - 03:36 .

[Ryenke]

No.

360

Good game, not up to DAO standard though.

[Sora Shepherd]

Yes
360

However, I say it's a step in the right direction. It needs more work.

[MingWolf]

No.

PC.

Though I actually liked DA2. Its a good game in its own respect, and I have played worst, worst games. I wouldn't still be dumping hours into the game if it were otherwise. It might not be the most refined, or indeed epic game of the decade, but it shall stay on my play list for a while.

[jhock21]

mechanics and graphics - yes:  story and lore - NO.        360

[klay.klay]

Improvement over DAO? Not sure, it's a pretty different game in many ways.

Improvement over ME2? Hell yes.

A great game that can stand up to DAO? Definitely yes.

Edit: forgot platform, PC

Modifié par klay.klay, 15 mars 2011 - 03:45 .

[Heinrich843]

No, although the two games are barely even related. (Even considering the combat, one involves flying anime combat and the other has believable animations.)

PC

[Thepeak12]

Yes
PC

[skan5]

No.
PC.

Lots of great efforts wasted by rushed development time.

[Caprica FC]

No.
PC.

[azarhal]

yes
PC

[DarkWulfy]

No.
PC

[Galad22]

No.
Pc.

[Rafe34]

No.
PC.

[Merci357]

improvement? no. (bad game? no - it's enjoyable)
PC

[neppakyo]

No.
PC

[TongueDar]

No.
PC

[erock75]

yes