randName wrote...
Lethvienne wrote...
I'm not mixing up Levels as what you are relative to the world, with that of game mechanics at all ~ I'm sometimes referencing other games, mentioning their level system, using it since most know that at level 18 in BG2 you are extremly heroic in strength, with 20+ being demi-godly etc. This is just a reference.
I'm only using these as reference points.
But what I'm talking about is the common, day todad use of Level, as relative to (and not as game mechanics).
You on the other hand always talk about game mechanics, as if when I state that I don't want to lower the level of a character, I talk about the game mechanic numeric, not the relative level to the rest of the world.
So when I say that I don't want to lower the level of a character, I only say that I don't want the character to be weakened relative to the world, and that has nothing to do with what numeric level the character uses, since this is arbitraty from game to game, and not of interest at all to me.
An other reason for me for them never to return, or use the Warden again, is that for me the story with the Warden is over.
In one game Anora and the Warden ruled, in an other Leliana and the Warden wandered off, and so on, we already got the epiloges, and if BioWare decided to continue the story of the Warden, they first need to retcon DA:O to something it never was.
That isn't what you said in the other post. I even quoted you. You say one thing then claim you meant another. And you keep repeating yourself; it's a bit tiring. Right now you're just nitpicking on semantics, really. I talk about game mechanics because you keep bringing up the same argument over and over again, and it's the argument to which my game mechanics opinion applies. You say one thing, then switch and sort of blur the two.
I have already addressed the whole 'level relative to the world around the Warden' thing repeatedly (really, I GET it, there's no need to keep going back to it just because I disagree), though you conveniently choose to ignore that. I have addressed everything you brought up, yet you keep going back to the level thing - level relative to the rest of the world, of course <_< . So, what did you expect?
Well, I think I'll jump off this little ferris wheel of a debate; the thought of going around yet again isn't terribly appealing. I never did like ferris wheels.
I will say this, though; the Warden's story may be over for you, filled with gaps though it is, but that does not apply wo everyone. Not even the majority. As I said before, I feel a compromise would be the most fair to all concerned.
Now, I have feel I have made my point, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. And just in case, do be kind enough to note that I said 'acknowledge', not agree. I am not expecting you to agree.
Retour en haut
I don't know about your warden, but my warden was nigh-invincible. Normal attacks dealt about 2-5 damage to him and magic could hardly even get through his resistances. Even the archdemon was not able to take him down below 90% hitpoints. That's not nigh-invincible? It sure is.
), I want to play Hawke again, not anyone else. Cameo's are welcome but the stage belongs to the Champion now.
