Why did City Guard attack me during the final battle?
#1
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:02
She specifically mentioned that her husband had the Guard guarding the Viscount's palace, so they wouldn't be a problem.
But when I get to the courtyard, here comes Fenris walking in . . . .with a pack of City Guards.
What gives?
#2
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:03
#3
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:36
#4
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:38
Still, I thought the guards weren't supposed to come...
#5
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:42
Now, can anyone explain to us how this makes sense?
Or was it just laziness in making enemies?
#6
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:43
#7
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:44
Stupid elf. Smashed his skull good.
#8
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:45
TJPags wrote...
I'm assuming not a glitch, then.
Now, can anyone explain to us how this makes sense?
Or was it just laziness in making enemies?
It would have been easy enough (and perhaps more appropriate) to have Fenris escorted by Templar, imo. I think we can chalk it up to not all of the guard following orders. Some of them likely supported the purge and end up joining with Fenris.
#9
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:45
#10
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:47
UNOSHI wrote...
uhm.. u guys mean templers right? cuz when i sided with mages. Aveline said i say what ur trying to do here. im sticking with you till the end. then when merredith comes with her Templer and Fenris. i convinced him to join my team. only thing that attacked me during the battle were templers. blood mages and Orison...damn lunatic.
No, I mean City Guards.
Fenris came walking into the courtyard escorted by a bunch of people labelled as City Guard.
I got the same Aveline conversation you did. Fenris was at full rivalry, went with Meredith, I couldn't talk him down. I expect to see him again . . . and would have made sense if he was with Templars.
But it was City Guard.
#11
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 01:53
TJPags wrote...
UNOSHI wrote...
uhm.. u guys mean templers right? cuz when i sided with mages. Aveline said i say what ur trying to do here. im sticking with you till the end. then when merredith comes with her Templer and Fenris. i convinced him to join my team. only thing that attacked me during the battle were templers. blood mages and Orison...damn lunatic.
No, I mean City Guards.
Fenris came walking into the courtyard escorted by a bunch of people labelled as City Guard.
I got the same Aveline conversation you did. Fenris was at full rivalry, went with Meredith, I couldn't talk him down. I expect to see him again . . . and would have made sense if he was with Templars.
But it was City Guard.
I asume a glitch then. mine relations ship with Aveline is maxed out. Fenris. some where balanced. Maybe its cuz hes rivalry he took over the gaurds.. i think... i doubt it tho. only thing rivalry could do is, stoping him from joining you.
besides i find the friend/rivarly thing bit dull. some love u when they hate u... and vise versa....
#12
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 02:15
#13
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 02:21
xdaimyox wrote...
If you listened to the convo, Fenris explicitly states that he convinced that particular group of guardsmen to back him up against you. In his own snotty way, he can't help but show you that not only are you wrong in his eyes, but that he can convince even your own trusted guardsmen to turn on you because of it. Not a glitch as far as I can tell.
I didn't catch that . . . interesting . . . .
#14
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 02:30
TJPags wrote...
xdaimyox wrote...
If you listened to the convo, Fenris explicitly states that he convinced that particular group of guardsmen to back him up against you. In his own snotty way, he can't help but show you that not only are you wrong in his eyes, but that he can convince even your own trusted guardsmen to turn on you because of it. Not a glitch as far as I can tell.
I didn't catch that . . . interesting . . . .
Didn't catch that either. Still, I didn't and still don't like Fenris. I took great pleasure in smearing him all over the couryard.
NPCs have surprised me before, when delving deeper into the, (read: Zevran), so, for the sake of fairness, I'll be trying harder to get to know him in my next play through.
#15
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 03:02
#16
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 03:50
ArawnNox, I took the time on my more recent playthrough of DAO+A to give Zevran a bit of leeway, and while I wasn't surprised per se, he became more tolerable to me. I'm not sure that Fenris will ever get that out of me however. It was easier for me to deal with Morrigan than it was Fenris, tbh, and I feel that's saying something; she has her own meme.
Still, I helpped Fenris secure the first peace he's seen in his life- over 6 years with minimal contact from his old life in Tevinter, I saved his life and tied up his own loose ends for him (which he was apparently unable or unwilling to do himself). He pays me back by Emoing out in the bottom of the 9th inning. He watched me single handedly dispatch the Arishok and spent the third act watching me drop 7k assassinates(seriously bioware? o.0), and still thought it wise to turn on me. Good riddance.
#17
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 03:56
No, there are no banters as to whether he's brooding or not. There are banters commenting on how broody he is.Oneiropolos wrote...
I can't imagine anyone who's actually heard Fenris and Varric banter, some of the best dialogue in the game, could view him as emo or brooding. There's whole banters about whether he's brooding or not...
The companions call him broody, the writer calls him broody, and throughout the game he sits in an abandoned manner brooding on the past.
Sorry, but this is like someone attempting to argue that Isabela doesn't sleep around.
#18
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 04:01
#19
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 04:05
#20
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 04:07
xdaimyox wrote...
On that note, walking in on Isabela looking for STD cures from Anders... priceless.
THAT was absolutely HYSTERICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#21
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 06:12
Maria Caliban wrote...
No, there are no banters as to whether he's brooding or not. There are banters commenting on how broody he is.Oneiropolos wrote...
I can't imagine anyone who's actually heard Fenris and Varric banter, some of the best dialogue in the game, could view him as emo or brooding. There's whole banters about whether he's brooding or not...
The companions call him broody, the writer calls him broody, and throughout the game he sits in an abandoned manner brooding on the past.
Sorry, but this is like someone attempting to argue that Isabela doesn't sleep around.
I was referring to Varric telling him he's brooding and him retorting back that he's not brooding. And Varric's being thrilled when Fenris makes a joke about dancing in the mansion. I should have probably clarified it as ONLY brooding. Isabella sleeps around, but that's not ALL she is. I don't even care for her, but I wouldn't make that assertion. I'm sure if I TRIED to understand her better, and spend more time around her, I'd find she had more redeemable qualities. And she is pretty amusing in things she said when I did have her along. I just don't understand this impulse by people to automatically write Fenris off. None of the companions in Dragon Age (either game) are JUST what they appear at first. Even Sten, who probably gets the least development, isn't JUST stoic. I mean, the guy likes cookies. Unlike the original Dragon Age, you couldn't just keep talking to someone in camp to learn more about them, so my point was just that before you write off a character, you do have to give them a chance in party banter to actually show who they are.
As far as killing his sister? He barely remembered her, but he was HAPPY to meet her.... until he found out she not only alerted his previous master but she was doing it so she could BECOME A MAGISTER HERSELF. When you tell him not to kill her, he retorts, "Why? She was going to stand there and watch me be killed!" Then you find out in the past, Fenris even fought for the chance to get the tattoos because there was a monetary reward for it...he used that reward to free his mother and his sister. So he obviously did love both of them. His sister says he got the better deal of it as she walks out. I'm not saying killing your sibling is A-OK, but finding out your sibling betrayed you and was going to watch you die all so she could become a the assistant to your old master and gain power? And what power it is... Fenris comments at one point to Sebastian that he watched Denarius kill a young boy at a party just to amuse the other magisters with the magic from his blood...he wanted to know what the point in that was. Sebastian suggests that perhaps the point was in letting Fenris witness it so he could prevent it from happening again. Varric was going to kill his brother too unless you prodded him not to, and I don't see everyone going "And Varric's fratricidal!" Why? Because his brother betrayed him first? So did Fenris's sister. If you won't condemn Varric for his feelings, you can't condemn Fenris for his. In fact, if you have Varric with you for that scene with Fenris's sister and tell him not to do it, Varric even speaks up and says that he knows it's hard to believe right now, "but elf... I mean Fenris... you really don't want to do this." I liked the scene for Varric's input, the fact that Varric is really the only one out of the party that TRULY understands Fenris's turmoil, and thought it was just a really nice touch by the writers.
And yes, Varric manages to humanize any character you stick in a party with him. I really didn't expect to like him as much as I do. I've always been kinda "Eh..." about DA's dwarves. But Varric completely won me over.
#22
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 07:17
#23
Posté 14 mars 2011 - 07:30
It also seems like too much is placed in 'romance' scenes that you have to wait around for or hope for instead of being able to find out things because you're best buds with them. Which makes me sad because I never romanced Morrigan because I was a female in the first game, but my warden considered her like a sister just from the conversations.





Retour en haut






