iOnlySignIn wrote...
Vandicus wrote...
Those who actually know the DA:O story because of the books know that Loghain is just crazy. The battle at Ostagar could've been won, and was supposed to look that way. Loghain did not abandon Cailan because of a desire to preserve the army, which is a common misconception. This all in fact ties back to a promise that Loghain made Maric when Maric demanded that Loghain stay. Loghain swears to help Fereldan, no matter the cost. Because of this, Loghain convinces Maric to kill his beloved without telling him info that might've stayed Maric's hand. Later, Loghain wants Cailan to die because of Cailan's apparent willingness to have friendly relationships with Orlais. Loghain is so crazy that he believes Orlais to be the only threat to the country of Fereldan, which is why he rejects 200 Grey Wardens who come to save them from the Blight. In The Calling, Loghain believes that Wardens asking for aid from Maric are part of a conspiracy to assassinate Maric and attribute his death to darkspawn. Loghain appears to be heavily irrational and have some delusions that suggest he is in fact paranoid.
Loghain is NOT crazy. His mother was raped and then slaughtered in front of him with the rest of his family by the Orlesians when he was a kid. He was a hero, a legend, an icon of the indomitable Ferelden spirit. I fully understand what he did and expected nothing less from him.
In DA2 I chose the Hero of Ferelden history, where Loghain lives to see his fears come true once more. Orlais IS now threatening Ferelden again now the Blight is over. If Cailan had lived, he may as well have become Empress Celene's little **** and Ferelden an Orlesian province.
Of course Orlais wants to take over Fereldan, that doesn't make everything an Orlesian conspiracy and every person an evil Orlesian trying to take over Fereldan.
If Loghain is rational and assuming his goal is to prevent Orlais taking over Fereldan he:
A. Intentionally sacrifices a large portion of the Fereldan army to kill the Fereldan king
B. Refuses to accept support from a group famous for their neutrality in politics(Wardens)
C. Virtually ignores the Blight, not even marshalling any army to fight it whatsoever as of the time the Warden has spent a year assembling a coalition and defeats him
Can you explain to me how any of this puts Fereldan in a stronger position than if the Blight had been quashed in the first place? I say that his actions are irrational. Please explain to me how Fereldan would be more likely to be controlled by Orlais if the Blight had been crushed before it really began(in Duncan's words) and most of the Fereldan army, landscape, and cities were still intact with a popular heir on the throne?
Unless by understand, you mean sympathize, not consider a logical course of action.