13 réponses à ce sujet

[heidtb]

that there is going to be a sequel?

i mean they just threw it out there, with the whole varric telling seeker the story and the unresolved ending and the intrusion of my favorite character...

please bioware, beginning to end, not half way 

[AlexXIV]

We even thought there would be a DA3 when DA:O wasn't released. If that surprised you, you must have learned about Dragon Age just the other day.

[dwinning]

Yeah, that's why I hated Empire Strikes Back so much! C'mon Lucas! Beginning to End!!

[Red Templar]

It is a bit odd. DA is not a defined trilogy like ME; each game is supposed to be a self-contained game of its own, with the world as its common character. I can buy DA2's ending as a build up to DA3, but it is a bit odd to have no closure on how my Hawke ends up, and to have both him and my Warden randomly abandon their political commitments and disappear, while knowing that I'm unlikely to play either character in DA3.

[Nathan Redgrave]

heidtb wrote...

that there is going to be a sequel?

i mean they just threw it out there, with the whole varric telling seeker the story and the unresolved ending and the intrusion of my favorite character...

please bioware, beginning to end, not half way 

Stuff it. There's nothing wrong with a cliffhanger. Some of the best games, movies, and books have been the exact opposite of self-contained. You're just projecting your cynicism onto the ending.

Oh, hello, I'm Mass Effect, the Reapers are coming, buy the sequel. I never heard any complaints about that ending.

[White_Buffalo94]

Red Templar wrote...

It is a bit odd. DA is not a defined trilogy like ME; each game is supposed to be a self-contained game of its own, with the world as its common character. I can buy DA2's ending as a build up to DA3, but it is a bit odd to have no closure on how my Hawke ends up, and to have both him and my Warden randomly abandon their political commitments and disappear, while knowing that I'm unlikely to play either character in DA3.

It may not be abandonment. My Warden left the Wardens (Which isn't political) to pursue his love and child.
My Hawke is leaving for something else, but he had no political duty to Kirkwall. He simply defended the mages from the Templars.
I think they will both play a big part in DAIII, although idk how they will do the Warden, voice and imports alike... Hopefully it all goes very well

[Nathan Redgrave]

Red Templar wrote...

It is a bit odd. DA is not a defined trilogy like ME; each game is supposed to be a self-contained game of its own,

 
You decided this after exactly one game, which can very well end with a mysterious loose end depending on whether or not someone bones Morrigan on the eve of battle.

Uh, no. That doesn't exactly hold much water.

That being said, it's not like DA2 leaves any evil force or major antagonistic character to threaten the world. It is, in its way, a self-contained story of an incident that shook the foundations of how the world works. So it's not exactly a second entry in a trilogy of anything like that in the traditional sense, either.

[NarcissaArtois]

I hope that they do another one...but it bothers me that Verric said all the companions went their seperate ways (except for Fenris of course)...I don't really want to start from scratch with companions again...Im still waiting to get Kaidan back in Mass Effect.

[Algus]

Red Templar wrote...

It is a bit odd. DA is not a defined trilogy like ME; each game is supposed to be a self-contained game of its own, with the world as its common character. I can buy DA2's ending as a build up to DA3, but it is a bit odd to have no closure on how my Hawke ends up, and to have both him and my Warden randomly abandon their political commitments and disappear, while knowing that I'm unlikely to play either character in DA3.

Well they've clearly changed course from Dragon Age: Origins.  Perhaps they're looking at just doing a duology with Dragon Age II and III.  

Personally I don't mind this, but I'd like to see them bring Hawke back as an NPC and let you make a new char (mainly so I can HOPEFULLY get to make an elf or dwarf again).  Maybe we can also cross our fingers that we'll get an Awakenings style expansion pack for the game.  

[KenKenpachi]

dwinning wrote...

Yeah, that's why I hated Empire Strikes Back so much! C'mon Lucas! Beginning to End!!

Hmm oddly I loved the Empire Strikes Back, I liked seeing Luke getting his ass kicked. Cliff hangers are fun. More so when its the whiny hero doing the hanging mawhahaha.

I say Sandal will be your enemy or on your team for three..

Modifié par KenKenpachi, 14 mars 2011 - 07:58 .

[Sonris89]

I... Have to agree. I hate cliffhangers with a burning passion. Its not edgy, its not creative, and its not fun.

Its just a ploy to make you play and buy longer. An obvious one at that. Could just be me though.

[Kristofer1]

Red Templar wrote...

It is a bit odd. DA is not a defined trilogy like ME; each game is supposed to be a self-contained game of its own, with the world as its common character. I can buy DA2's ending as a build up to DA3, but it is a bit odd to have no closure on how my Hawke ends up, and to have both him and my Warden randomly abandon their political commitments and disappear, while knowing that I'm unlikely to play either character in DA3.

KOTOR?

[dwinning]

KenKenpachi wrote...

dwinning wrote...

Yeah, that's why I hated Empire Strikes Back so much! C'mon Lucas! Beginning to End!!

Hmm oddly I loved the Empire Strikes Back, I liked seeing Luke getting his ass kicked. Cliff hangers are fun. More so when its the whiny hero doing the hanging mawhahaha.

I say Sandal will be your enemy or on your team for three..

I was being facetious. 

[boraxalmighty]

Also don't forget that they are building lore from the ground up unlike BG and KOTOR. Your gonna have "cliffhangers"(even though they're not really cliffhangers) because the story is not complete. That's like hating a trilogy because it's not 1 big ass long movie.