WHY??? cant we participate
#1
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:15
#2
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:17
#3
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:19
#4
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:21
#5
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:22
#6
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:23
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
#7
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:27
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Wrong. It's because of federalism and not a centralized government that the quebecois have the freedom to make their own laws, which include a harsher anti-private lottery laws.
#8
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:29
MrGOH wrote...
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Wrong. It's because of federalism and not a centralized government that the quebecois have the freedom to make their own laws, which include a harsher anti-private lottery laws.
pwnd x2
#9
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:30
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Canucks are actually a West Coast team and have nothing to do with Quebec, not that it matters where the term comes from. This is why I dont like in the eastern part of Canada(or the middle, its ****ing cold there). Quebec is ass backwards feudal biggotry.
#10
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:31
Achromatis wrote...
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Canucks are actually a West Coast team and have nothing to do with Quebec, not that it matters where the term comes from. This is why I dont like in the eastern part of Canada(or the middle, its ****ing cold there). Quebec is ass backwards feudal biggotry.
Whereas in the west you have enlightened feudal bigotry against Quebecois?
#11
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:32
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Snort. Joke of the week?
#12
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:34
#13
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:40
MrGOH wrote...
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Wrong. It's because of federalism and not a centralized government that the quebecois have the freedom to make their own laws, which include a harsher anti-private lottery laws.
Well played sirs. Well played.
#14
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:42
So no Québec province participant in "online" sweepstakes. There is probably other things, like if it's a book/movie/etc it need to have a French version, etc.
#15
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:46
Curry Noodles wrote...
Achromatis wrote...
BluesMan1956 wrote...
Because you're Canucks, eh?
This is a good example of why centralized socialistic government is a step away from personal liberty and a step towards tyranny. Be careful of what you vote for!
Canucks are actually a West Coast team and have nothing to do with Quebec, not that it matters where the term comes from. This is why I dont like in the eastern part of Canada(or the middle, its ****ing cold there). Quebec is ass backwards feudal biggotry.
Whereas in the west you have enlightened feudal bigotry against Quebecois?
In-fighting is what keeps people warm in the winter.
#16
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 01:47
"Many sweepstakes are void in Quebec because the sponsors must follow a stringent set of rules set out by the Quebec government.
- For example, Quebec requires that contests and sweepstakes, depending on their prize value, must do some or all of the following things:
- Register the sweepstakes rules and all advertisements used to promote the contest with the Quebec government at least 30 days ahead of the sweepstake's launch.
- Pay a fee of 10% of the sweepstake's value.
- Agree to allow the government of Quebec to mediate any lawsuits arising from the contest.
- Follow strict guidelines about the contents of the sweepstakes rules.
- Allow the Quebec government to determine if the sweepstake may be changed or canceled once it has started.
- File a written report after the contest has concluded, attesting that the prizes have been delivered or attempted to be delivered.
- Agree to follow a number of other rules and guidelines.
are also a significant burden on money and resources to sweepstakes
sponsors, and the consequences for a mistake are severe.
Rather than run the risk of facing legal action if these long and
complicated rules are not followed to the letter, and to maintain
control over their sweepstakes, many sponsors take the easy route of
simply barring entry from Quebec residents."
So yeah..
#17
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:23
#18
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:42
#19
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:47
#20
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 03:59





Retour en haut






