Aller au contenu

Photo

Why does Sebastian get under people's skin? (Spoilers)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
362 réponses à ce sujet

#301
Treasure Woman

Treasure Woman
  • Members
  • 101 messages

Aniki_21 wrote...

I do find it hilarious and quite frankly disturbing that some people dislike Sebastian because he's apparently too religious and "preachy" of a character but at the same time can forgive Anders for being a mass murderer of inoccents..


Most of your companions in DA:O and 1 other than Anders in DA II, that I know of, have murdered innocent people. Yet everyone still loves them and forgives them. But when Anders does it, everyone screams "murderer", "oh he broke mah heart, boo hoo", "terrorist", etc. and then kills him.

That bugs me. And kinda irritates me a little.<_< *sigh* Oh well.

#302
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

basbaker wrote...

I don't see any reason to take it to PMs. I'm not at all offended by your viewpoint. I can see both sides of the issue, and I don't have strong enough feelings either way to get upset about it. I'm merely pointing out a different way of looking at things. I started this thread over a month ago because, while I see the flaws in Sebastian's character and understand the strong feelings a lot of people have on the very touchy subject of religion, I love the way he's written, the way he's acted, and the way he isn't quite as cut-and-dried as people might think at a glance.

As with every companion that the Dragon Age team throws our way, there are layers complete with black, white and shades of gray. But people tend to dismiss Sebastian's shades of gray. His character gets lost in the shuffle of whether or not religion is wrong or right. People are free to love or hate Sebastian for anything from the color of his eyes to the way he says the word bunny. I just like to hear why. I like to hear what people think of one of my favorite characters in this game, even if he's one of their least favorite.

To me, your opinion is just as valid as that of anyone else who takes the time to really think it through and understand why they feel the way they feel. I'm glad you posted.


Very well, then.  I just know that for all that I stand by my post, even in discussions where it's somewhat relevant to the topic, it has the potential to trigger a vicious flamewar.  I'd prefer to avoid that, but I find that certain things can just cause major upset no matter how delicately or diplomatically phrased.  Heh.

Now, as to Sebastian...as far as his realization as a character, it must be said, I think, that I quite like him on that level.  Quite a few of the characters of DA2 match up perfectly with people I've actually known, and that's the mark of damn good writing.  Any time a character is real enough I can recognize them amongst my personal collection of friends and acquaintances, it's a job well done.  But that's a different matter from whether or not Sebastian is the sort of personality I would associate with IRL.  I simply would not.  In fact I can point to several people in my social group who fit the bill.  People I have no choice but to be in contact with because of our mutual acquaintances, but whom I keep at arms' length because their moral outlook is so opposed to my own. 

I do feel it's worthwhile to point out that shades of grey don't have to have any bearing on a character's likeability.  All well-written characters, characters that are fully human, are shades of grey, because that's the nature of humanity.  It's why I scoff at people who think that characters only make sense if they never, ever contradict themselves, because real human beings contradict their own personalities and belief systems all the time.  Sebastian isn't evil.  He's not even a bad guy.  He's got a degree of somewhat respectable traits.  But for some of us, there are certain qualities that just can't be overlooked.  Aside from my feelings of damaging religious beliefs, the scene that makes me dislike Sebastian the most is where he demands that Hawke execute Anders.  I have no doubt that this was done more for the game mechanics than to reflect on Sebastian's character, but it's inescapable if one wants to immerse themselves in the story: if Sebastian had any real integrity, was truly focused on justice for Elthina, then he wouldn't just throw a temper tantrum if Hawke refuses.  He'd damn well execute Anders himself, even if he had to cut through Hawke to do so.  Or else he'd be prepared to risk being killed by Hawke in order to do so.  He certainly would not, moments after pointing out the moral wrongness of slaughtering the Circle for Anders' crime, throw up his hands and go "Fine, if you want kill him I'll go home and get my army and wipe Kirkwall off the map!"  Frankly, I find it patently ridiculous that the game makes Sebastian so hot for Anders' death as justice for Elthina, but he doesn't even make an attempt to kill Anders himself.  The only way to provide a lore-based explanation for that is for his staunch beliefs to be not so heartfelt after all.  Fortunately, since Sebastian is already painted as extremely capricious, it isn't so far fetched to view him that way.

#303
basbaker

basbaker
  • Members
  • 102 messages
Capriciousness has got to be one of his biggest character flaws, and even though I love Sebastian, it's one that drives me up a wall. He seems incapable of making important decisions on his own. Instead he makes excuses for why he won't decide one way or another, or he lets himself be persuaded. It's kind of ironic really when he asks Hawke if he/she would be waffling it was him inside the Chantry when it blew. He spends most of the game waffling over the prince v. priest issue.

I think you're right that how he handles the Anders situation at the end is mostly due to game mechanics, because BioWare presumably wanted Anders's fate to be completely up to the player. Sebastian as he's otherwise written would probably have been willing to do the job himself in that moment. But the threat to gather his armies and march on Kirkwall is pretty hollow. I consider it more bravado than anything else, because he's been backed into a corner for maybe the first time since he was handed over to the Chantry. Combined with the shock of Elthina's death, it's all too much, and he snaps.

The unfortunate thing is that the game doesn't give us any more than that to go on. It comes to an abrupt end, and whatever happens after that is anyone's guess - including Sebastian's threat. I like to believe that he does get Starkhaven back and takes it upon himself to hunt Anders, without bringing Kirkwall into things. But who knows?

#304
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages
Agreed, his threat to gather Starkhaven's force and raze Kirkwall to the ground is hollow given his inability to make up his bloody mind, and my Hawke found it difficult not to laugh in his face at the prospect, especially since he has to actually retake the Starkhaven throne first. But that he would make the threat speaks volumes about his character. I mean...really, Sebastian? I realize you're angry and heartbroken, but dude, seriously, you yourself just pointed out the injustice of slaughtering an unrelated group for the actions of one man. Also, you're lucky you can figure out which shoes to wear in the morning, and I'm supposed to believe you're capable of leading an army?

Plus, even if that scene was driven more by game mechanics, it still fits in with his character...after all, rather than go after his family's murderers himself, he hired outside help. There's an argument to be made that he did so in order to preserve the Vael line, since he's the last, of course, but that didn't stop him from accompanying Hawke to the Harrimann estate.

Modifié par Silfren, 03 mai 2011 - 02:06 .


#305
Bekkael

Bekkael
  • Members
  • 5 697 messages

basbaker wrote...

Capriciousness has got to be one of his biggest character flaws, and even though I love Sebastian, it's one that drives me up a wall. He seems incapable of making important decisions on his own. Instead he makes excuses for why he won't decide one way or another, or he lets himself be persuaded. It's kind of ironic really when he asks Hawke if he/she would be waffling it was him inside the Chantry when it blew. He spends most of the game waffling over the prince v. priest issue.

I think you're right that how he handles the Anders situation at the end is mostly due to game mechanics, because BioWare presumably wanted Anders's fate to be completely up to the player. Sebastian as he's otherwise written would probably have been willing to do the job himself in that moment. But the threat to gather his armies and march on Kirkwall is pretty hollow. I consider it more bravado than anything else, because he's been backed into a corner for maybe the first time since he was handed over to the Chantry. Combined with the shock of Elthina's death, it's all too much, and he snaps.

The unfortunate thing is that the game doesn't give us any more than that to go on. It comes to an abrupt end, and whatever happens after that is anyone's guess - including Sebastian's threat. I like to believe that he does get Starkhaven back and takes it upon himself to hunt Anders, without bringing Kirkwall into things. But who knows?


I believe the endgame with Sebastian played out the way it did because of upcoming expansion/DLC. The devs stated that his story is not done.

#306
Madi

Madi
  • Members
  • 74 messages
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

[quote]Silfren wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

What lead me to that conclusion was her dialogue. Aveline addresses that Wesley believed and she makes it clear that she doesn't. She doesn't think that the Chant of Light is true, simply that "it's beautiful" and "maybe that's all it needs to be."[/quote]


I have to agree that it's not conclusive that Aveline is an atheist.  She does NOT ever state that she flat out does not or cannot believe.  What she does actually say is "This business of the less the Maker does, the more he's proven...I don't find it compelling," or words very close to that.  It's abundantly clear that she has doubts as to the established Chantry position of the Maker, but her statement is far too ambiguous to draw any absolute conclusions from. [/quote]

If you prefer thinking of Aveline as an atheist and NOT agnostic that's fine but the evidence clearly
indicates otherwise.  The fact that she
clearly has doubts about the Chantre doesn't automatically make her an atheist.
I think the distinction between atheism and agnosticism were made clear in her
dialogue. "Either he's at the maker's side or he isn't" is basically
the equivalent of "Either he's in heaven with God or he isn't" An
atheist wouldn't make that statement as atheists do not take a maybe, maybe not
approach.

Modifié par Madi, 03 mai 2011 - 06:11 .


#307
basbaker

basbaker
  • Members
  • 102 messages

Bekkael wrote...

I believe the endgame with Sebastian played out the way it did because of upcoming expansion/DLC. The devs stated that his story is not done.


This is my hope :)

#308
QueenPurpleScrap

QueenPurpleScrap
  • Members
  • 695 messages
I may be totally off base, but I didn't view Sebastian as waffling so much as trying to be a better man. I think that he liked himself better, and thought he was a more worthy person when he started to listen to the Chant and try to understand what the Chantry is about. I am pro-mage, by the way. I am not sure he would agree with all the official dogma, but his mentor, the Grand Cleric seemed to me to be much more tolerant than a lot of other Chantry people, and certainly more so than templars. Tolerance is not a bad example to follow.
I didn't find him preachy. I think he wanted to make people think, and maybe explore his own faith even more. For instance, when Merrill (who I think is a total twit, even if amusing) says she thinks the story of Andraste is nice but has some holes, Seb does not get snarky.
I will admit, having read these posts, I doubt I will try to romance him in the next game. Too bad, might have been fun. Unless later DLC or games make it more viable. My first game I romanced Anders, so couldn't kill him. I told him to go away (although I got him back a little later). I took Seb's reaction as disbelief, anger, hurt and frustration. He might go back to Starkhaven, but I figure he would cool down and not attack Kirkwall, although searching for Anders might become a preoccupation.
It would be nice if Hawke had some sort of reply to Seb's outburst. That seemed incomplete to me.
I agree with all those who felt the romances could use more substance. Way more.
I was disappointed with Anders, actually. I liked him much better in Awakening (where I thought he left for a little while and then came back for good). I don't like how Bioware deliberately ignored their own writing just to get Anders in here. How about this for a reason for him to be in Kirkwall: he was with some other wardens on business/or was asked to talk to the K Circle about the Architect and opted to stay and help with refugees, not actually leaving the wardens. He could then have gone back to Amaranthine (where they probably wouldn't let him loose on his own again). That would fit in a little better. In DA2, he is a different person. Ugh, all that angst. A little too much for me.
I think I wandered off point a bit, so will stop now.

#309
Sable Rhapsody

Sable Rhapsody
  • Members
  • 12 724 messages

QueenPurpleScrap wrote...

I may be totally off base, but I didn't view Sebastian as waffling so much as trying to be a better man. I think that he liked himself better, and thought he was a more worthy person when he started to listen to the Chant and try to understand what the Chantry is about. I am pro-mage, by the way. I am not sure he would agree with all the official dogma, but his mentor, the Grand Cleric seemed to me to be much more tolerant than a lot of other Chantry people, and certainly more so than templars. Tolerance is not a bad example to follow.
I didn't find him preachy. I think he wanted to make people think, and maybe explore his own faith even more. For instance, when Merrill (who I think is a total twit, even if amusing) says she thinks the story of Andraste is nice but has some holes, Seb does not get snarky.


Yeah, I didn't find Seb particularly preachy either.  And I'm an atheist who pretty consistently dislikes organized religion and its trappings IRL.  He tried to show his faith in the Maker through his thoughts and actions, not through constantly pestering Hawke or the other companions.  Seb is the kind of religious person I could like and befriend.

#310
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

Madi wrote...

If you prefer thinking of Aveline as an atheist and NOT agnostic that's fine but the evidence clearly states otherwise.


By "clearly," you mean entirely in how you chose to interpret her words? She makes it clear Wesley believed, she doesn't provide the same impression about her own beliefs.

#311
Kawamura

Kawamura
  • Members
  • 1 960 messages
I'm sure this came up, but:

"Fenris: Danarius once killed a little boy to fuel blood magic that let him impress his fellow Senators at a party. What was the purpose there?

Sebastian: Perhaps it was witnessing that which will give you the strength to prevent it ever happening again."

I had very little patience with him after that.

#312
Aniki_21

Aniki_21
  • Members
  • 172 messages

Treasure Woman wrote...

Aniki_21 wrote...

I do find it hilarious and quite frankly disturbing that some people dislike Sebastian because he's apparently too religious and "preachy" of a character but at the same time can forgive Anders for being a mass murderer of inoccents..


Most of your companions in DA:O and 1 other than Anders in DA II, that I know of, have murdered innocent people. Yet everyone still loves them and forgives them. But when Anders does it, everyone screams "murderer", "oh he broke mah heart, boo hoo", "terrorist", etc. and then kills him.

That bugs me. And kinda irritates me a little.<_< *sigh* Oh well.


Really don’t know where
you got the idea that “most” of the companions in Origins murdered innocent
people. There’s really only 2 I can think of. Zevran is Assassin and obviously
killed a lot of people, likely innocent and guilty. Certainly a bit of a scumbag
character who I never liked. Sten was guilty of killing a family in a sudden
state of psychosis.  Unless I missed
something I’d love to hear about the innocent people the other characters were
guilty of killing because I don’t recall that being the case. Zevran was a
murderer but at least he wasn’t a self righteous hypocrite like Anders. Zevran
was also indoctrinated into the life at an early age. Anders committed premeditated
mass murder completely out of his own free will. I’m sure he and Osama Bin
Laden would get along great.

 

#313
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

QueenPurpleScrap wrote...
 How about this for a reason for him to be in Kirkwall: he was with some other wardens on business/or was asked to talk to the K Circle about the Architect and opted to stay and help with refugees, not actually leaving the wardens. He could then have gone back to Amaranthine (where they probably wouldn't let him loose on his own again). That would fit in a little better. In DA2, he is a different person. Ugh, all that angst. A little too much for me.
I think I wandered off point a bit, so will stop now.


I didn't like the complete dismissal of epilogues where Anders clearly died, since all Bioware had to do to make his return plausible would have been to re-write all his ending slides differently.  But your suggestion doesn't work, either.  Staying in Kirkwall to help refugees does qualify as leaving the Wardens, as there's no Warden outpost there, and helping refugees doesn't constitute Warden business.  All our established lore on Wardens strongly suggests he wouldn't be just allowed to up and start doing something else.  It's a lifelong calling, after all, archdemon or no.  Also, given Kirkwall's position on mages, even with Warden influence I doubt he'd be just left to his own affairs once the other Wardens were gone.  None of the templars, and certainly not Meredith, would just let a Circle mage roam loose outside the Circle.

I honestly don't get why people are surprised by or bothered by his being a different person.  That's perfectly in-line with his story, after all.  He's merged with a single-minded spirit of Justice, of course he's not the same.  He even alludes to the changes in party banter and cutscene dialogue.  It's not like it's out of left field.  But this has wandered quite off-topic now...

#314
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Aniki_21 wrote...

I’m sure he and Osama Bin Laden would get along great.
 


Shyeah, I can see why people are calling 9/11 the new Godwin.  But anyway, Osama bin Laden is not a good comparison to Anders.  John Brown is much closer.  

#315
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8 282 messages
Sebastian was my least-favorite character, but that was probably because he was so well-written.

He is a liar, but the one he lies to most is himself. He believes that he is loyal, but he will betray his solemn vows not once but three separate times. He has pledged himself to the chantry, but he breaks that vow so he can be prince. And then he breaks those oaths because Elthina would rather be a martyr than flee Kirkwall. And then he betrays those vows because the PC will not become a vigilante and murder the man who killed Elthina and six innocents (there were never more than 7 people in the Chantry at any one time).

He is not doing any of this because he believes in the Maker. He is motivated entirely by selfishness. He does not want to oust his cousin because it would be better for the people of Starkhaven not to have a simpleton on the throne. He wants revenge for the murder of his family. He does not renew his vows to the Chantry out of devotion to the Maker. He does it because he wants to protect someone he cares about. When his mentor achieves her desired martyrdom, he is not interested in justice. He just wants to kill the person responsible for her death. Which is ironic. He will murder every person in Kirkwall because the PC is protecting someone s/he cares about... like Sebastian himself would have done for Elthina.

That doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the character. I do. It's just that I'm never going to play a game where Anders dies, so Sebastian will always storm off to go post a notice on some Starkhaven Chanter's Board looking for volunteers to raze Kirkwall on his behalf.

And no, I am not blind to Anders' flaws. They just annoy me less than Sebastian's. After all, Anders tells you again and again and again that he will break your heart. He warns you over and over that he is not to be trusted. He makes no attempt to push the blame for his actions onto anyone else. He knows that he will pay for the lives of the 7 people he killed with his own and he makes no attempt to escape or evade responsibility for it. Credit where it's due. Mind you, none of my PCs will ever kill him, but there are plenty who do.

#316
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

berelinde wrote...

Sebastian was my least-favorite character, but that was probably because he was so well-written.

He is a liar, but the one he lies to most is himself. He believes that he is loyal, but he will betray his solemn vows not once but three separate times. He has pledged himself to the chantry, but he breaks that vow so he can be prince. And then he breaks those oaths because Elthina would rather be a martyr than flee Kirkwall. And then he betrays those vows because the PC will not become a vigilante and murder the man who killed Elthina and six innocents (there were never more than 7 people in the Chantry at any one time).

He is not doing any of this because he believes in the Maker. He is motivated entirely by selfishness. He does not want to oust his cousin because it would be better for the people of Starkhaven not to have a simpleton on the throne. He wants revenge for the murder of his family. He does not renew his vows to the Chantry out of devotion to the Maker. He does it because he wants to protect someone he cares about. When his mentor achieves her desired martyrdom, he is not interested in justice. He just wants to kill the person responsible for her death. Which is ironic. He will murder every person in Kirkwall because the PC is protecting someone s/he cares about... like Sebastian himself would have done for Elthina.

That doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the character. I do. It's just that I'm never going to play a game where Anders dies, so Sebastian will always storm off to go post a notice on some Starkhaven Chanter's Board looking for volunteers to raze Kirkwall on his behalf.

And no, I am not blind to Anders' flaws. They just annoy me less than Sebastian's. After all, Anders tells you again and again and again that he will break your heart. He warns you over and over that he is not to be trusted. He makes no attempt to push the blame for his actions onto anyone else. He knows that he will pay for the lives of the 7 people he killed with his own and he makes no attempt to escape or evade responsibility for it. Credit where it's due. Mind you, none of my PCs will ever kill him, but there are plenty who do.


Hear, hear.  Although I do have to say that it's quite likely that there were more people in the Chantry than those we saw, and some of that stone debris raining down from the vortex in the sky very possibly landed on people.  But beyond that, those people we do see in the Chantry when it goes boom?  Are not what I'd call innocent.  It's Grand Cleric Elthina and templars.  

#317
Aniki_21

Aniki_21
  • Members
  • 172 messages

Silfren wrote...

Aniki_21 wrote...

I’m sure he and Osama Bin Laden would get along great.
 


Shyeah, I can see why people are calling 9/11 the new Godwin.  But anyway, Osama bin Laden is not a good comparison to Anders.  John Brown is much closer.  


I don't know, Anders and Bin Laden , both mass murdering terrorists who justify their atrocities because of a greater "cause". Although unlike Bin Laden Anders pretty much seemed to plan and execute his act of indiscriminate mass murder entirely on his own. So i guess he actually puts Bin Laden to shame as a terrorist in that respect.

Modifié par Aniki_21, 04 mai 2011 - 06:10 .


#318
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

berelinde wrote...

 Mind you, none of my PCs will ever kill him, but there are plenty who do.


I do have to say that, well, I was going to have several playthroughs where Anders was executed, but I'm starting to rethink that simply because I don't think Anders actually can be killed, what with Vengeance being permanently merged with him.  And I figure it's better to just keep him alive rather than have to re-arrange my headcanon to deal with Bioware retcons.  :whistle:

#319
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Aniki_21 wrote...

Silfren wrote...

Aniki_21 wrote...

I’m sure he and Osama Bin Laden would get along great.
 


Shyeah, I can see why people are calling 9/11 the new Godwin.  But anyway, Osama bin Laden is not a good comparison to Anders.  John Brown is much closer.  


I don't know, Anders and Bin Laden , both mass murdering terrorists who justify their atrocities because of a greater "cause". Although unlike Bin Laden Anders pretty much seemed to plan and execute his act of indiscriminate mass murder entirely on his own. So i guess he actually puts Bin Laden to shame as a terrorist in that respect.


One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.  Whether or not Anders is a terrorist depends purely on your perspective.  I reject any arguments of there being an objective definition for terrorism, because there are quite a few examples throughout history of people committing acts that qualify as terrorism, that are not universally regarded as terrorists.  The problem is that the victors of a conflict have a tendency to not view the actions of people who were fighting on their side as terrorism.  The American revolutionaries could easily be regarded as terrorists, but I don't know many Americans who are willing to concede such.  (And I'm a U.S. citizen, just so there's no misunderstanding).  
But anyway, I reiterate that Anders is more aptly compared to John Brown than bin Laden.

Modifié par Silfren, 04 mai 2011 - 06:36 .


#320
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8 282 messages
@Silfren: You're right, but you aren't going to get anywhere with that argument. People are determined to vilify the character, and this includes comparison to iconically evil figures. Such is life.

#321
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 675 messages
Sebastion is a flawed individual who's views swing by pressure and circumstance depending on how emotional he is at the moment?

Part of the charm, really. Why should I take his vow to raze Kirkwall any more seriously than the esteemed Mother took his conviction to retake Starkhaven? Emotional people react emotionally, and can take time to settle down. This is not some abhorrent moral weakness: this is human nature. More convincingly so than 'I'll stick to what I believe unless Hawke was nice enough/a jerk enough to me'.

I'd dispute that Sebastion isn't true to his nature: his nature, like quite a number of people's, just happens to be one in which emotional moments spark emotional responses and pledges that wane and waver when the emotions do. That doesn't mean that they're insincere at all.

#322
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 627 messages
Seb annoys me for many reasons. He is just as the grand cleric said he is fickle. When the next *passion* takes him he’ll change his mind again. Hypocrite.

Next fighting with him is annoying, Andraste/Maker forgive me! Constantly…um we are fighting demons…knock it off; you don’t need forgiveness for that! Gah

#323
Guest_PurebredCorn_*

Guest_PurebredCorn_*
  • Guests

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

Yeah, I didn't find Seb particularly preachy either.  And I'm an atheist who pretty consistently dislikes organized religion and its trappings IRL.  He tried to show his faith in the Maker through his thoughts and actions, not through constantly pestering Hawke or the other companions.  Seb is the kind of religious person I could like and befriend.


I agree with you completely.

#324
LadyJaneGrey

LadyJaneGrey
  • Members
  • 1 647 messages

Silfren wrote...

berelinde wrote...

 Mind you, none of my PCs will ever kill him, but there are plenty who do.


I do have to say that, well, I was going to have several playthroughs where Anders was executed, but I'm starting to rethink that simply because I don't think Anders actually can be killed, what with Vengeance being permanently merged with him.  And I figure it's better to just keep him alive rather than have to re-arrange my headcanon to deal with Bioware retcons.  :whistle:


Of course, the developers can change their minds at any time, but your head canon should be safe when shanking Anders.

#325
Aniki_21

Aniki_21
  • Members
  • 172 messages

Silfren wrote...

Aniki_21 wrote...

Silfren wrote...

Aniki_21 wrote...

I’m sure he and Osama Bin Laden would get along great.
 


Shyeah, I can see why people are calling 9/11 the new Godwin.  But anyway, Osama bin Laden is not a good comparison to Anders.  John Brown is much closer.  


I don't know, Anders and Bin Laden , both mass murdering terrorists who justify their atrocities because of a greater "cause". Although unlike Bin Laden Anders pretty much seemed to plan and execute his act of indiscriminate mass murder entirely on his own. So i guess he actually puts Bin Laden to shame as a terrorist in that respect.


One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.  Whether or not Anders is a terrorist depends purely on your perspective.


Alright instead of debating the semantics of the word "terrorist" let's just go with what we know for sure. Anders is an indiscriminate mass murderer who's victims included men, women, likely children, along with mages whom he claimed to be fighting for.