77 réponses à ce sujet

[Ashwraith]

Depends on which Hawke you're speaking of. Currently, I have two.

Ravenna (Mage Hawke)- The version I began the game with, and the first to finish.
She'd probably be best classified as Neutral Good: wants to be everyone's best freiend, doesn't like confrontation, and is able to see both sides of the 'mages versus templars' debate.
She believes that by helping everyone she possibly can, she is a living example of how mages are not something to be feared and despised. At the same time, she's just as willing to admit that most templars are just trying to protect those who don't know how to defend themselves against hostile magic. As such, she's as likely to help the Chantry as other apostates.

Calanthe (Rogue Hawke)- This one's a lot harder to pin down. Cal kind of... waffles between Chaotic Neutral, and Neutral Evil. Her viewpoint's a lot more polarized than my MageHawke, mostly because she's dedicated her life to protecting Bethany. She's had it drilled into her head for years that what people don't understand, they fear, and fear inevitably leads to violence (...yeah, she kind of saw the Qunari debacle coming a mile away).
Her opinions on the matter, though, mostly just apply to things directly relating to her- like family and friends.
She's not afraid to dirty her hands, and will take jobs from very nearly anyone who asks... provided they have the coin.
Also, she's gleefully murdered her way through a small percentage of Kirkwall's population.
Remember, kids: assassination, for fun and profit! : D

[Omega_Novae]

Well...

Warrior Hawke (Alexander) is Chaotic Good. Overall a good guy who likes helping people, not keen on excessive responsibilities except to his friends and family, so the whole Champion deal is a bit overwhelming for him.

Rogue Hawke (Elias) is Lawful Neutral. Basically, a jerk with a heart of gold who follows his personal religious code (a dark offshoot of Andrastian religion) very strictly, though he deems the Chantry an abomination.

Mage Hawke (Olivia) is Neutral Evil. A real schemer who likes to play certain systems to advance her position, but supports the downfall of the templars wholeheartedly. Acts either to bring herself up or to put others down.

[Stinkface27]

My mage I would say is chaotic good. This current play though with my pro-templar warrior is very lawful neutral.

[upsettingshorts]

Neutral or Neutral Good. I'm not sure because my Hawke would view "balance" as inherently good.

I'm gonna go with Neutral. 

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 27 mars 2011 - 07:15 .

[sonsonthebia07]

I'm not gonna read about the D&D jazz.

Darien: a hardass with a soft spot for mages and their plight, takes pleasure in killing and won't hesitate to eliminate those who stand against him, very curious about blood magic and what powers it may have hidden

Celeste: fun-loving, joker, sarcastic to a fault, fair minded, will do anything if money is involved, and also doesn't mind getting her hands dirty if the situation warrants

[CLime]

First playthrough Hawke was Chaotic Good. Not afraid to get his hands dirty or crack a few skulls, but followed his moral compass on the big issues, and wasn't hostile to companions or random NPCs. Pro mage.

Harder to pin down my current Hawke. He follows a code of personal ethics, but depends much more on honor than morals. He's happy to gut some random thug or townie who gets on his nerves, and has no sympathy for the less fortunate, but still seeks to serve some greater purpose and not cause meaningless destruction. Probably Lawful Neutral, though the "law" there rarely lines up with the actual laws of the society in which he operates.  Closer to Evil than Good.  Pro templar.

Modifié par CLime, 27 mars 2011 - 09:48 .

[Xewaka]

Going by D&D categorization, Neutral Good rogue, with dashes of lawful whenever Aveline was involved. Conflict-neutral (heavily tilted towards pro-mage) right until terrorist abomination did his thing, which meant full support to the templars.

[Merllle]

Chaotic Good. Always and forever!

[Biometry]

Evelyn and Adrianna are Neutral Good and Beatrice is Lawful Evil.

[Icinix]

Chaotic good.

Every Character.

Every Game.

[Apollo Starflare]

Depends on the character, and even my first Hawke evolved over time.

I suppose it would be:

-True neutral
-Neutral good
-Lawful good

Throughout the three acts that is. The general character arc was from neutral roguish type always looking for a payout who deflects most serious things with humour, ending up as a more lawful character hardened by the events over the years. Loyal to both his friends and the city. Y'know thinking about it like that my Hawke was a classic tale of rogue turned do gooder/nobility hah. He did side with the Templars though, and I'm not sure whether killing Anders means he doesn't qualify as a 'good' character.

I do change the character quite completely for each playthrough however, still deciding between a few ideas I have for my next playthrough at the moment.

Modifié par Apollo Starflare, 27 mars 2011 - 01:49 .

[knownastherat]

Chaotic Neutral

[mousestalker]

Lawful Snarky

[Shepard Lives]

Lawful Angry.

[Stinkface27]

sonsonthebia07 wrote...

I'm not gonna read about the D&D jazz.

You should sometime, it doesn't take long to read and it's the backbone for a lot of what we know of RPGs today. Plus once you know about alignments, you can never stop mentally categorizing every character in every book/show/movie/game.

Darien: a hardass with a soft spot for mages and their plight, takes pleasure in killing and won't hesitate to eliminate those who stand against him, very curious about blood magic and what powers it may have hidden

Chaotic Neutral

Celeste: fun-loving, joker, sarcastic to a fault, fair minded, will do anything if money is involved, and also doesn't mind getting her hands dirty if the situation warrants

probably also Chatoic Neutral..although depending on just what you would do for money, you might be edging towards Evil ...

[sonsonthebia07]

Stinkface27 wrote...

You should sometime, it doesn't take long to read and it's the backbone for a lot of what we know of RPGs today. Plus once you know about alignments, you can never stop mentally categorizing every character in every book/show/movie/game.

I respect it for what it represents, but I'm not wanting to go around categorizing stuff based off a set list.

[Stinkface27]

sonsonthebia07 wrote...

Stinkface27 wrote...

You should sometime, it doesn't take long to read and it's the backbone for a lot of what we know of RPGs today. Plus once you know about alignments, you can never stop mentally categorizing every character in every book/show/movie/game.

I respect it for what it represents, but I'm not wanting to go around categorizing stuff based off a set list.

Well the thing about this particular list is that it encompasses everything. But I do understand what you're saying.  It's just for fun anyway.

[galian77]

Ahh, if we're going to bring up D&D

My Hawke was sarcastic and always did what she thought was best, never mind if it was right or not. So I guess that would put her at True or Chaotic Neutral?

[klusps]

My mage Hawke is neutral good while my sarcastic Hawke is neutral.

[GodBID]

My current character could be classified as: Lawful Evil

[PirateT138]

Neutral good. As are most of the characters I play.

[kreite]

morally good.

I don't obey the law all the time.

[sndwurks]

If I had to use D&D alignments... from the older systems...

Gareth (male Warrior) Hawke was firmly chaotic good. He was a snarky, sardonic jackass with a heart of gold, who truly believed that the Templars were an evil against the world who had to be fought. Fell in love with a Dalish who was abandoned by her tribe, and always stood by his friends' sides, looking out for their best interests.

Mina (female Mage) Hawke was a bitter, angry woman who had seen too much hardship in her life, and viewed the world in terms of weakness and strength. Ultimately, she was Lawful Neutral (though I would prefer Unaligned), because she never acted from a moral compass. She spoke plainly, and had a temper. She could not stand betrayal in any form, and considered blood mages to be weaklings who fell to temptation. Needless to say, siding with the Templars turned her romance with a certain spirit-possessed mage into something out of a Shakespearean tragedy.

Haven't started my third play through. I'll see what I feel like when the time comes.

[ReallyRue]

Chaotic Neutral mage. She had her good moments, like when she executed the magistrate's son, but she also had some selfish/evil moments, like blackmailing Thrask over the magey nature of his dead daughter.

Although the more things heated up towards the end of the game, the more Chaotic Good she became, with 'helping fellow mages no matter what' becoming her goal.

[yhishtchie]

Grayden, my rogue (assassin/shadow), was basically Han Solo with a touch more selfishness. But he treated his friends (except Fenris) & family well, and would help out the disadvantaged if they couldn't help themselves. Chaotic good (or unprincipled for those who've played Palladium). He sided with the mages, because he saw them as oppressed, and especially because his little sister was in the Circle and his Elven wife is an apostate.

Laryn is a beautiful, haughty, elitist mage with a very bad temper. Not the type to sneak up behind you, slit your throat and rob you, but she is ruthless and vindictive. She got colder and more methodical as the game progressed, and aspires to be viscountess. She's sided with the templars in the final battle, hoping to eliminate all other mages, as they are serious threats to her own power.  She's smitten with Isabela, who returns the sentiment, so she's not all ice inside. Fenris approves of her methods, Aveline has had many disagreements with her, she utterly disdains Anders & Merrill, and doesn't really care about the rest. She did, however, insist on saving her younger brother from the Corruption. Lawful evil/aberrant (Palladium).