2797 réponses à ce sujet

[AkiKishi]

If there is one single thing that dragged the game to a 4 rating for me it's this. Hordes of trash coming in waves with no thought at all and worse even , doing it in a cheap way like teleporting on top of my mage.

I remember BG when encounters were thought out, we would fight parties of almost eqal ability to ours and those battles were glorious (even a couple of years afer release which was when I got into the game).

DA2 is poor, this stuff works in action games because you have the tools to deal with them , and those tools are not constantly on cool down.

[Yriss]

Chadthesad wrote...

HawXV2 wrote...

Enemy encounters

Why do they randomly appear? In Origins, you guys had it perfectly. Behind a door they would come streaming, or when you turn the corner, bam! Darkspawn! Now, they just...apear. Literally. I've defeated many a wave quickly, just to see a warrior phase through like Star Trek! Very immersion breaking.

It was an attempt to show how reinforcements would appear. It wasn't done great, but the concept is in the correct direction.

Oh wow. I hadn't thought of that... waves of enemies being
reinforcements. Kind of cool. I don't remember seeing warriors phase in
though... dropping from the sky/windows, yes, but not phasing. Most
likely I was just never in the right place or angle to witness it. The
only things I remember phasing in are shades, abominations, etc, and I
think that's their normal method of transport. Heheh.

With that
said, I don't mind the waves. It keeps me on my toes. There were many
times where I thought I finally made it, but then more came, and my
party was low on everything (health, stamina, and mana, cooldowns
still... cooling down) and thought, "Oh goodness, no!" In a good,
challenging way. Had to regroup, dispatch orders, and try to survive another assault.

Rogue-type enemies


They're so overpowered! They'll disappear and one shot my healer, or if they don't, they'll half my tank's health! And there seems to be no CD. Tsk Tsk!

They can do a lot especially on Nightmare mode. I found mages to be more difficult. If threat was generated and the proper skills were choosen for warriors, Rogues mobs weren't able to do much. Yes, though rogue mobs are challenging.

I don't mind rogue opponents. I play a Rogue/Assassin and I can one-shot my enemies. So why can't my enemies one-shot me? It seems fair. I must admit that the first few times I encountered an enemy assassin, I was flabbergasted at how quickly they killed me or Anders. My warriors were in better shape to defend against them though.

So now, whenever I see an Assassin, I target them and try to assassinate them first. If they disappear, then according to one of the Loading Page Tips, area of effect talents/spells should still injure them and dispel the illusion, so I have Anders cast something (or if he's low on mana, then I just hope we don't get hit!). My warriors can take the backstab for the most part.

[Begarian]

First, the negative (keep in mind I play on Nightmare difficulty on the PC):

1.  Game development length:
Now, none of us know the exact length of development that went into Dragon Age 2 or if development started before Origins was released (keep in mind there was DLC and Awakenings developed to), but for Dragon Age 3, I'd like to see a development cycle of two years or a little more.  I don't care if EA rushed you guys for DA2 or there was an active decision to do a sequel in a year's time, but Dragon Age 2 really could've used another year of development to hammer out the following kinks.

2.  Level Design
I'll keep it brief since you guys have been hammered with it a lot:  do not re-use level designs.  It feels cheap and pathetic everytime I come to the same cave but there's a solid gray "door" closing off a section of an area that I can clearly see on the automap.  I don't mind if quests have us coming back to an area we've already been to, but when there's nothing new to look at, (especially since the game is supposed to be over a number of years), it gets boring.

3.  "ANOTHER WAVE"
I will disown Bioware as my favourite development company in the entire world if this aspect is put into any one of your games ever again.  It's a cheap way to inflate difficulty into the game, it feels like a forced way to extend battle length without having enemy NPCs do something interesting, and it breaks immersion when non-fade like enemies materialize out of thin air.  The only time I've accepted "ANOTHER WAVE" is during the Winters Mercenary fight when the leader clearly stated there are reinforcements on the way and there was a minor cut scene between each battle to indicate that we're still under attack.

4.  Rogue Lieutenants (Assassins)
Rogues should not have more health and armor than their warrior counter parts.  It's also stupid to make them luck based to control.  Even if I taunt with my Warrior, their backstabs will randomly target any of my party members.  Most of the normal ways to control them, that even work on your bosses, do not work on Assassins.  The only solution I've found viable is to have one party member kite them for ten to fifteen minutes as my other party members deal with the other enemies (and waves) until the assassin is left and then continue to kite.  If you stop, they'll stun lock you and probably kill a party member instantly.  One wrong move, one bad kite, one hesitated second, and my entire fifteen minute strategy falls to pieces.  This has happened on several occasions.

Now the good and apathetic:

5.  Conversation Wheel
I completely understand the change from line based conversations to the conversation wheel due to having a voice character.  I like voiced main characters and I like Male Hawke (haven't heard female Hawke).  The conversation wheel is better than Mass Effect due to all of the kind of "emotions" you have control over other than Inquisitive/Renegade/Paragon in Mass Effect.  It's a good step forward, but it does lose some of the moral ambiguity that Origins/Awakenings had.  I really like the fact that you can hand the conversation over to a companion (like Varric) if they're better able to handle the situation.  This is an awesome addition that needs to be in Mass Effect 3.

6.  Companions
All of the companions are great.  It's nice to see old faces with new.  You guys have always done a great job creating fantastic companions.  I can't wait to see what happens with them in Dragon Age 3.  One thing that's missing though is being able to converse with them as much as you could in Origins (in the camp) or even Mass Effect (on the Normandy).  You get a quest to go talk to them in their home and perhaps even take on some of their troubles and then that's it.  You can click on them and hear a one liner at any time, but that's about it for constant interaction.

7.  Customization in equipment
On one hand, I lament the fact that I have an excess of really cool helmets, armor, boots and gloves that are just merchant fodder due to the fact that none of my companions can be equipped with them, but on the other hand I like the fact that my companions have a "distinct" look that have upgrades.  You guys should add in upgradable armor for Mass Effect 3, but please give us back full customization over my characters.  The companions get decent armor ratings, and everything increases based on levels, but I'm one of the players that love min/maxing my equipment for the best effect.

8.  Abilities
I love the skill trees.  They're much better than Dragon Age: Origins.  I've seen some complaints about not getting enough abilities, but I say "screw that!".  I was overloaded with abilities in Dragon Age: Origins and by the time I got to a high level, I barely used my abilities that I gained at a low level, opting for my higher level earned abilities.  Upgradable abilities was a nice touch and allowing for new combat options to open up with cross-class combos.  Speaking of which...

9.  Cross-class Combos
This is probably the most amazing feature in Dragon Age 2.  They're well balanced, they're much better than trying to co-ordinate two mages pulling off a spell combination (or trying to combo off yourself) and allows for all three classes to have something to add to the damage.  If there was one thing I'd want added to this system, it would be to lessen the damage and add a debuff.  Did my Warrior just stagger an enemy?  I can throw a Chain Lightning at the staggered enemy and do massive damage.  What I'd like to see is throwing my Chain Lightning at the staggered enemy, do more damage (but not as much as what it's currently add) and add a debuff based on what I just used.  If it's Chain Lightning, perhaps that enemy is now stunned as well from the electricity running through their body.  Maybe they get an armor debuff or an attack penalty.  Something like that.

That's all I can think of for now.

[MisterShine]

Borrowed from my review yesterday, focusing on the criticism/ideas parts:

General Thoughts:

The New Style: This is the big one, from which almost every like/dislike branches off from. Overall I like the game which is why The New Style goes in this column. I've been a fan of Bioware since they floored me with Baldur's Gate, and while I think there've been some rough patches (NWN single player campaign..) I love the company and I love their products. And while the thought of a spiritual successor to BG excited me, I loved Origins for what it was however I could never shake the feeling that it was held back from its own by tying itself so closely to Baldur's Gate. Origins was just too SAFE for Bioware. Too easy to fall back into what they once were instead of cutting a new path. And in an industry filled to the brim with copy-paste sequels and "Follow The Leader" mentalities, we need step forwards anywhere we can get them. We can't remake or relive that genius of BG, we have to press forward and Origins suffered because we fought against that. Dragon Age needs to be its own series with its own Style, and while it may have evolved from Baldur's Gate and tip its hat to its proud predecessor, the series MUST find its own sense of self for it to achieve greatness. And while these transitions to the Dragon Age style have been rough, I feel that with more improvements and refinements (even a few regressions to Origins), we can have a brilliant series on our hands here. Well, even more so than it already is.

• Waves of enemies. I like the idea overall, it adds another kind of tension to combat on whether you should front load your abilities to end the fight quickly, or save the big spells for when the reinforcements show up. Where this doesn't work well is with the fact that 90% of all fights have reinforcements, even when there is no reason this should be so. Gangs occasionally dropping from rooftops or window sills to help out their comrades? Demons being summoned by a blood mage hiding in the back? That's cool, but it has to be used sparingly and wisely, otherwise there ISN'T that tension, as you know that in pretty much every fight you have to kill a few waves of enemies, and it turns to tedium. If you need the fights to not have that many guys, just make the enemies tougher.
• Companion dialog. I saw a post about this the other day, basically saying that you couldn't get a very good feel for the companions during Act 1, because you never got the usual options of asking them about themselves and their past. I totally agree with this, but I also enjoy that more talking is spent on inter-party dialog and talking about things that they're dealing with NOW rather than what they did in the past (like Merril and her clan issues, or the Mirror) Finding some way to balance these two would be great. Also, the companion dialog availible in the houses (what few there are) are limited and don't show a lot about the character. Not sure how to fix that one but... just sayin'.
• Act 2/3 changing due to actions in previous acts: I have yet to complete my second playthrough, so I can't comment on how well this is done in the game. However I will say this: You've got this great setup to SHOW your actions really matter in the long run, and the changes should be much more than a few dialog changes and some sidequests. I think a 20% shorter game would be far more impactful on the player and on the industry at large if it changed wildly based off of your decisions.
• I'm not sure how I feel about a 60 dollar product with such an open ending to it. While I of course was screaming at the screen at the end, I wasn't really UPSET in a bad way because I knew I'd be getting the (meaty) DLC (we'll talk about this next) and the sequel, but what about people just introduced to the series? I'm not averse to having endings set us up for another or leaving some plot threads dangling, but at least in Origins and ME2 especially you got SOME sense of closure on the story, then with some tidbits at the end in case you were interested. I think that's a better way of doing it personally.
• Real DLC this time. Hour long crap just isn't going to cut it anymore Bioware. While Ostagar, Wardens Keep and Golems were interesting, 5 bucks for an hour long adventure that deals with only one minor thing just isn't filling at all, and leaves the player with a sense of "Thats it?". There's just no closure there. You got away with it for Darkspawn, Leliana's and Witch Hunt, because the first two were just off the wall (and while I overall thought they were okay, I like the different approaches), and the last because everyone wanted to know what the hell was up with Morrigan. I know voice actors make returning characters a ****, but these often flat side characters just don't match the great job you guys did with the originals (though the ones in WH were funny). So, maybe more a focus on 5-10 hour adventures with a real X-pac like awakenings thrown in for good measure? Or a character like Sebastian to join you on subsequent playthroughs. I just can't see myself purchasing things like the first mentioned group again, even if they were free, they're so paper thin I get almost nothing out of them anyway.

[*]Kirkwall over time. Namely, that much didn't change. Now I know, such an old and big city isn't going to change THAT much over time, however we had a great chance to see some effects of our actions on the city really taking place. If our Hawke is a Champion for Kirkwall and the common man, and does lots of siequests to clean up the streets and help out the poor, shouldn't we get rewarded by seeing these areas improve over time? Less and less thugs running about, things getting cleaner.. Also, construction could be starting on some large building (maybe a keep or something) when you first arrive, then you see it half built when you first step outside in year 4, and then when you get outside in year 7 you see it in all its glory. THEN you spell out on screen "Year 7!" instead of just saying it was a couple years later.[*]More personal interactions with your romance choice, or just party members in general. I know Dragon Age isn't a dating sim, but throwing in a few sequences that are like "dates" with your party members, going out to a festival or party or just out to eat with the family and talking, I think would be a great way to show characters in their elements and how they interact. These don't have to be longer than a few minutes, but I think would add a ton.[*]Attributes not mattering to roleplaying. Part of helping to identify with a character isn't just about choosing her class and personality archetype, but also in choosing how she will deal with her problems. While there are some ways of dealing with issues non-violently, these are few and far between and have more to do with who you bring with you on the mission. The best RPG's in history have many means of avoiding combat situations, even with people who really want to kill you This is annoyed me quite a lot in DA2, as there were times when I was forced to fight and kills mages and templars who I was actually just trying to talk with. How would lowering your weapons and saying "Hey, I'm here to help you guys. You're backed into a corner and need me!" not get a response? Just felt like some pointless Lets You and Him Fight trope to break in an action beat. [*]Needs more enemy types. Even if the enemies look similar, fighting humans who are more than melee fighter/archer/mage/assassin would be cool. Like, what kind of mage are we fighting? Elemental mages? Blood mages? Buff/debuffing mages who run away and hide behind other enemies? Seeing variance in the same enemy types would help make combat more interactive, rather than "This is enemy group Type C, execute attack patter Gamma!", and then win every fight using that same tactic. Mix it up a bit![*]Some less options in roleplaying. For example in the Dalish sidequest you could side with Werewolves, the Dalish, or broker a Third Option. If say you sided with the Dalish, you could say that you sided with them because what the Werewolves did was wrong, or because you gave your word to help, or because you didn't give a ****, or because maybe you yourself were Dalish. And usually for the other sides somethign similar would be in place. Not really the case in DA2. While I won't speculate as to why this is, I'd say in DA2 it could be tried of after making a decision on the right side of a wheel, it would jump to the next wheel that you could pick a reason. Or maybe take advantage of the Investigate option (and point out that more choices are availible there). I don't know how that might slow down some convo's, but its a thought at least.[*]Ambiguity of the decisions you make. Not putting emotions on the decisions was a great decision, and the many times where you're unsure of what you're doing either because its a delicate situation or you're just not in possession of all the facts, and you know this but you're forced to make a decision anyway. This adds a lot of tension and I love it, more of this in DA3!
[*]New combat. Origins was fairly plodding with lots of bloated abilities and downright useless talents. More specializations or larger trees are a must for DA3. Also, adding to the ambiguity and forced-choices in the story/dialog, why not incorporate this into the skill trees? For example, lets take the Smashing Blow talent for warriors in the 2 handed tree. It has two upgrades, one that ups the damage and force, and one that lets it work with cross class/or takes advantage of it. Instead of letting players get both, why not make each one better, and forcing them to only pick one? I know this will make some OCD players disturbed by not seeing all the little bubbles filled in, but maybe the other talent could disappear once you make the choice. Also, it will help with roleplaying, as now you can say "My Hawke is a two-handed specialist with some tanking mixed in" instead you could say "My Hawke is THIS kind of Two-handed specialist with THIS kind of Tank mixed in". Again, I think it would help reinforce the grey-n-grey setting of the game even further.[*]More sidequests like the Wayward Son, where we get to see parts of it and the characters inside evolve more as the years go on (and maybe have those sidequests become different quests later based off of what you choose, instead of just getting another one/not getting another one based off what you do)[*]
Sorry about the length, I doubt anyone will read this but if so, I hope it was useful or at the very least interesting. If you have any questions/comments/snide remarks, please feel free to quote me or PM me. 

Have a good one [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wizard.png[/smilie]

[John Epler]

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

[HawXV2]

JohnEpler wrote...

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

Ah...I feel pretty happy now that my thread is being used for what it was made for. I hope I'm making an impact in my favorite franchise.

[Zalg0]

I felt that the combat was pretty lackluster, honestly. If I wanted to play a button masher, I would boot up God of War. I would like to see more real balance and thought going into the way combat plays out, instead of "let's have these guys oneshot your healer while your tank's taunt is on cooldown, that'll make it difficult!" In much the same way that games like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. fall below the mark in their mechanics, (partly due to bugs and partly due to lazy programming,) DA2 just feels like a game based around the story with the combat added on in an afterthought. One wonders, however, how a game based around story could also fail in telling an engaging story. I never once felt like I ever had a firm comprehension on what Hawke's response would be when I chose a certain speech option. "Good, Bad, and Witty" are hardly able to encompass the sheer variety of human conversation, independent of the mind-boggling ambiguity of the 'hints' next to the indicator.

[Kogaion]

i tried 3 times to play DAO ...i couldn't get past the stupid combat system (i know i shouldn't have said that on a rpg fan forum) but from 4th attempt i was caught by the story and i end up playing it full 6 times BUT i can't remember anything about combat ...DA2 has combat to remember, a totaly different but good story telling ...good chars .etc. ...

my complaint will be the total lack of exploration..i know DAO had a little of that ..but DAO at least had a map of Fereldan...the 2D map from DA2 is annoying ..so i expected a little more exploration of the Free Marches, this is my main complaint

[sgriffin0810]

JohnEpler wrote...

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

Assuming direct control.

[Junri]

I played a full game of nightmare on the PC and here are my opinions:

Likes:
Dynamic personality system - which was only possible with a voiced character
Combat speed improvements, not as awkward
Difficultyof Nightmare is nice and challenging, while Normal lets more casual players to go through the game w/o feeling frustrated.
Better boss fights, less tank and spank more moving around.
A more personal story that allows us to focus on the lore and the depth of Kirkwall rather then have it spread out and unfocused. Sadly, this focus had some bad repercussions mostly with the re-use of areas and the same environments over and over again.
Good storytelling, much more personal and emotional
Nice enemy variety (assassins, mages, warriors, 2h warriors, blood mages, demons etc).
The decisions in DA2. Oh my god the decisions. I love them and how they were done.
Good soundtrack.
Nice crafting system, not tedious at all.
Friendship/Rivalry system

Neutral:
Companion Armors - its a love/hate relationship. I like the fact that the companions don't have to look ugly, but I feel restricted in customizing them.

Dislikes:
Recycled environments.
Removal of features like armor penetration and other combat features that added depth to combat (not really saying DA2's combat isn't deep, but it is  simplified and is only harder and requires more tactical thinking
because of the more variations of enemies and waves...)
Bosses have too much HP and once you figure out the pattern can be very easy... Still better than tank and spank, but there are no surprises once you figure them out.

Modifié par Junri, 15 mars 2011 - 08:13 .

[Ostagar2011]

Unconstructive criticism = "your presentation was bad"
Constructive criticism = "you had no eye contact during your presentation"

-OK so far so good -

Constructive unrealistic criticism = "your presentation did not cover topic X in its entirety"
Constructive realistic criticism = "the presentation should have at least touched on apect Y of topic X"

So John, what is our Constructive Realistic Criticism in this case, in order that we do not waste your precious time whining about the companion inventory lockdown, when this is non negotiable.
Set some parameters here please, or we will be talking cross purposes on a very long thread.

[Malanek]

I posted something similar in another thread but feel it is more appropriate here.

The camera was at times annoying. Personally I would prefer a detachable camera which can go higher. However if that is not possible I would really love for it not to "snap to" targets when you are positioning an AOE spell. It can occasionally be very difficult or even impossible to position them correctly because of this.

Wave combat would have been ok for a bit but obviously way overused. Would love to know the reasoning behind that design decision.

I think reused maps would have been ok if they had simply adjusted the minimap to suit each one. It would obviously be better if each one was unique but there were A LOT of them. Given that they wanted so many different areas they probably needed to do something clever. It isn't as bad a feature as is being made out. Again would love design comment on that.

Edit: Just thought I should point out that overall I think it is an excellent game, but this is the criticism thread.

Modifié par Malanek999, 15 mars 2011 - 08:13 .

[John Epler]

Ostagar2011 wrote...

Unconstructive criticism = "your presentation was bad"
Constructive criticism = "you had no eye contact during your presentation"

-OK so far so good -

Constructive unrealistic criticism = "your presentation did not cover topic X in its entirety"
Constructive realistic criticism = "the presentation should have at least touched on apect Y of topic X"

So John, what is our Constructive Realistic Criticism in this case, in order that we do not waste your precious time whining about the companion inventory lockdown, when this is non negotiable.
Set some parameters here please, or we will be talking cross purposes on a very long thread.

It's all good to a degree, but here's an example.

'I thought X was too Y' is okay criticism. It tells us there's a problem, and that it's something to look at. 'I thought X was too Y for Z reason' is better criticism. It tells us there's a problem, why it's a problem and that it's something to look at. The best criticism is, however, going to be 'I thought X was too Y for Z reason. As a result, A and B happened and tore me out of the immersion', because then we have a lot of feedback as to why it's an issue, what the problem was and what the knock-on effects of that problem were.

Don't hesitate to post your criticism, however detailed! But that's the kind of criticism that's the most useful and most likely to give us something to work on.

[Kortok]

The camera is terrible, reused dungeons, can't change companion armor, can't change companion weapon type, no friendly fire on hard difficulty, respawning enemies making the game an aoe fest, entire game takes place in one city, removal of non combat skills/crafting, weak boss encounters, poor companion race variety, forced into being human.

[leniush]

JohnEpler wrote...

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

obviously Biowerez didn't pay ANY attention when people were talkin about what they like about DA:O because everything of it is gone in DA2 

[Jamesnew2]

Dont get me wrong i think this game was awesome and to be honest i enjoyed it more than origins but i agree with some of the things he says such as reused maps.... its a shame not as bad as it could of been but still a shame... give your self more time bioware the people dont care if they have to wait 7 extra months.... we waited 6 for origins. I think the changes were needed as they bring rpgs into the 21st century. I agree the deaths were a bit wierd... i mean i stab him and yet he just melts into the floor with he limbs severed. BUT the romances were great and i loved the charactors sadly i wanted more and well with desiring more their was in my mind a lack of dialouge.... Ima give this 9.8 out of 10. 9.9 if you fix the issues and 10 if you make sure i get merril back for DA3.... Cuz imho she was my favourite charactor to romance in all the bioware games.

[mangiraffedogagain]

I think the biggest flaw this game has is not being able to play as ManGiraffeDog.

[HawXV2]

I think the enemies randomly appearing out of nowhere breaks the immersion because we want it to be realistic within the game world. This means that rogues can do it because of stealth, and mages because of magic, but not, say, a warrior. I also think making shadows come up from when someone appear would be good. Is that good criticism?

[Merci357]

leniush wrote...

JohnEpler wrote...

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

obviously Biowerez didn't pay ANY attention when people were talkin about what they like about DA:O because everything of it is gone in DA2 

If you care to elaborate, maybe, just maybe, you could have an impact on DA3. Just think of the possibilities! Or you could rant, I guess. They made mistakes, no doubt.
Obviously they, at least, paid attention to some points people disliked about DA:O. The silent PC, for example.

[HawXV2]

Merci357 wrote...

leniush wrote...

JohnEpler wrote...

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

obviously Biowerez didn't pay ANY attention when people were talkin about what they like about DA:O because everything of it is gone in DA2 

If you care to elaborate, maybe, just maybe, you could have an impact on DA3. Just think of the possibilities! Or you could rant, I guess. They made mistakes, no doubt.
Obviously they, at least, paid attention to some points people disliked about DA:O. The silent PC, for example.

Yeah, BioWare is looking at this thread for feedback. Instead of trolling, how about you give some?

[tomas819]

captain.subtle wrote...

Also QUIT WITH THE OVERDONE ROMANCES! Its an action RPG for chirst's sake. We want more mature themed philosophical dialogues (like in Deus Ex, Planescape) than twilight rehashes.

LOL. Well, I liked the romances. Well done, Bioware.

I don't understand the griping about them since they are like -- so freaking easy to avoid if you're not interested. Most good stories have a romance; at least, in this game, you can have it or not as an option.

My only criticism with the DA2 romances is that they were a bit over-the-top "emo" in some places. Still and all, though, I applaud Bioware for how you handled them. 

[Rockpopple]

I actually didn't mind not being able to change companion armor.

I mean they're not barbie dolls. (Well...Isabella....). They're supposed to be their own characters. They can dress themselves.

I would like to have seen even more "costume changes" for the companions. Maybe like how Hawke wore different clothing inside, if they plan to visit a noble or viscount, etc.

[leniush]

Merci357 wrote...

leniush wrote...

JohnEpler wrote...

Keep the feedback coming, folks. It is being read and.. collected.

Okay, perhaps not all that sinister, but we're paying attention.

obviously Biowerez didn't pay ANY attention when people were talkin about what they like about DA:O because everything of it is gone in DA2 

If you care to elaborate, maybe, just maybe, you could have an impact on DA3. Just think of the possibilities! Or you could rant, I guess. They made mistakes, no doubt.
Obviously they, at least, paid attention to some points people disliked about DA:O. The silent PC, for example.

Yeah, and now you have 3 choices in almost every conversation, thanks.
Sure i can elaborate. Stop making stupid games for casual gamers with story which looks like it's wrote by 6 year old.
Let me decide of my companions equipment.
Let me decide what should happen with the story instead of making the choices for me.
Let me go outside this goddamn city, and I'm not talking about those 2 dungeons.

Should i write more?