hakwea wrote...
AtreiyaN7 wrote...
As long as they're with your hetero character, they're straight. Seriously, who cares if they are all bi? From a character standpoint, I certainly don't find it all that believable because I think the odds are low that someone would actually end up with four people who are all bi. From the standpoint of fairness and equality however, I'm like, great, everyone gets to be with whomever they like the most.
Fairness and equality have no place in a story if it detracts from the story. Would Roots be the same if all the racism was edited out so as to not offend people? Would Star Wars be the same if han solo and luke skywalker had a romance? Would any story, fiction or non-fiction, be the same if any sexuality changed based on who they were around at the moment? Nope.
Having characters that are only gay, or only straight is not discrimination. It isn't being unfair, it isn't making some people not be equal. If anyone gets offend because they can't have everything the way they want it then they are deluded enough that a game shouldn't be designed with them in mind.
Does it ruin the game that everyone is bi? Not really. But it ruins the story of the characters when their "idle" conversations and responses don't match up with a side of the story you get to experince. The whole point of RPGs and having choices in the game is so it makes the story unfold around you and immerses you better.
It doesn't for me, but I suppose that depends on whether or not you're meta-gaming. If you're hypothetically operating solely on what Hawke knows, then you wouldn't have any idea what your companions' sexual orienations are. To your hetero Hawke, your LI is straight - that's all there is to it if you're actually staying in character. As for
Roots...honestly, that's a completely ridiculous example to bring up.
Also, who said anyone was ever discriminated against? What I do know is that there were people who were crushed that they couldn't romance Morrigan or Alistair in DA:O, so I'm of the opinion that what they did is okay
this time, because people get to choose who they want and everyone wins. I think Alistair had to be hetero because of the kingship issue in DA:O, but ignoring that, in DA2 it doesn't seem like there are any story-based reasons for limiting the sexual orientation of the companions.
I prefer to have a semi-realistic split, personally, but I had no strong feelings for or against what they chose to do. Furthermore, this situation is hardly the same as
Star Wars. Sometimes a story can only work one way, and in the case of
Star Wars, the Han and Leia thing simply had to be that way. Regarding DA2, Ive already said that from a character/story standpoint that it doesn't seem likely or particularly believable to me. However, we're clearly
not talking about a Han/Leia situation, so I think it's okay that they accommodated M/M, F/F and F/M.
Modifié par AtreiyaN7, 16 mars 2011 - 10:13 .