Anders seems just a tad more stable after blowing up the Chantry, perhaps that's evidence that he can be made to co-exist with Justice?Or maybe we can make Justice possess a tabby-cat!
...what?
Guest_laecraft_*
Modifié par laecraft, 06 avril 2011 - 07:26 .
Icy Magebane wrote...
And to people who think it's cool to resurrect characters just because you didn't kill them? That's selfish. If anything, they shouldn't be giving us those options in the first place. Try to look at the world from somebody else's perspective once in a while.
laecraft wrote...
== The Spirit of Hope ==
[giga cut of many lulz]
I think the person was implying such a DLC would retcon Anders' death for those who killed him.Shinsetsu wrote...
Icy Magebane wrote...
And to people who think it's cool to resurrect characters just because you didn't kill them? That's selfish. If anything, they shouldn't be giving us those options in the first place. Try to look at the world from somebody else's perspective once in a while.
Wait...so you're saying that we should respect the choice you made (I'm assuming that you killed Anders) by not asking for DLC for post-Act 3 Anders story? But what about our choice to not kill Anders? Is it somehow less of a worthy choice because it's not what you choose?
I feel like if there is anymore DLC to be released, it should respect the following three choices: 1) Siding with the Circle or the Templars, 2) the fate of your sibling, and 3) Whether or not you killed Anders. This should work similarly to how at the start of DA2, you choose which DAO ending you had (via game save or just selecting a preset history).
Everyone's choices should be respected.
Wait a minute, I was trying to say that since some people did kill Anders, there shouldn't be a DLC that negates that choice... The tone I had been getting from some posts was that the DLC should include Anders regardless of whether he was killed. I have no problem with them making Anders-related content that is only availible on files where he survived... I just don't want anymore Oghren, Leliana, or Awakening Anders fiascos... those are instances where character death is simply ignored (or in the case of Leliana, it might be explained later).Shinsetsu wrote...
Icy Magebane wrote...
And to people who think it's cool to resurrect characters just because you didn't kill them? That's selfish. If anything, they shouldn't be giving us those options in the first place. Try to look at the world from somebody else's perspective once in a while.
Wait...so you're saying that we should respect the choice you made (I'm assuming that you killed Anders) by not asking for DLC for post-Act 3 Anders story? But what about our choice to not kill Anders? Is it somehow less of a worthy choice because it's not what you choose?
I feel like if there is anymore DLC to be released, it should respect the following three choices: 1) Siding with the Circle or the Templars, 2) the fate of your sibling, and 3) Whether or not you killed Anders. This should work similarly to how at the start of DA2, you choose which DAO ending you had (via game save or just selecting a preset history).
Everyone's choices should be respected.
Modifié par Icy Magebane, 07 avril 2011 - 05:17 .
I'm not sure Anders is the most disliked, I think he's just the most polarizing. I know there was a thread out there that made up the numbers based on posters' responses and it turned out that Anders was about as popular as Fenris, which left him in the middle of the characters, more or less. Granted, that's not a perfect method, but if Anders were really that unpopular the numbers should have been different.Balthamoss wrote...
Why would they make a DLC for the probably least liked companion of all ? One that a lot of people killed at that.
Morrigan and Leliana got DLCs because they were very popular and important for the story (Morrigan with her godchild and Leliana because she would play a role in the sequels).
Eollodwyn wrote...
I'm not sure Anders is the most disliked, I think he's just the most polarizing. I know there was a thread out there that made up the numbers based on posters' responses and it turned out that Anders was about as popular as Fenris, which left him in the middle of the characters, more or less. Granted, that's not a perfect method, but if Anders were really that unpopular the numbers should have been different.
As for importance, you're going to have a hard time arguing that Anders wasn't important to the story.
Balthamoss wrote...
Eollodwyn wrote...
I'm not sure Anders is the most disliked, I think he's just the most polarizing. I know there was a thread out there that made up the numbers based on posters' responses and it turned out that Anders was about as popular as Fenris, which left him in the middle of the characters, more or less. Granted, that's not a perfect method, but if Anders were really that unpopular the numbers should have been different.
As for importance, you're going to have a hard time arguing that Anders wasn't important to the story.
He sure does play a very important part in the story - they needed a catalyst for the coming war in the next game and Anders gave just that, so he served his purpose.
I just don't see what they could do interesting with him anymore, especially since he's dead in many playthroughs.
As for popularity : look at the "most hated companion" - threads, Anders is named more often than any other character. And since you compare with Fenris : as of today, Anders' thread has about 700 pages and 75 000 hits, while Fenris' has 1440 pages and approaches 430 000 hits, I don't know how representative that is, but it doesn't give the impression that Anders is equally as popular...
Shmeep Shmee put it very well, so I'm not going to respond on that point, but I will try to find that thread that I mentioned. If I can...Balthamoss wrote...
He sure does play a very important part in the story - they needed a catalyst for the coming war in the next game and Anders gave just that, so he served his purpose.
I just don't see what they could do interesting with him anymore, especially since he's dead in many playthroughs.
As for popularity : look at the "most hated companion" - threads, Anders is named more often than any other character. And since you compare with Fenris : as of today, Anders' thread has about 700 pages and 75 000 hits, while Fenris' has 1440 pages and approaches 430 000 hits, I don't know how representative that is, but it doesn't give the impression that Anders is equally as popular...
Hm did you tried to look at the both threads creation dates?Balthamoss wrote...
Eollodwyn wrote...
I'm not sure Anders is the most disliked, I think he's just the most polarizing. I know there was a thread out there that made up the numbers based on posters' responses and it turned out that Anders was about as popular as Fenris, which left him in the middle of the characters, more or less. Granted, that's not a perfect method, but if Anders were really that unpopular the numbers should have been different.
As for importance, you're going to have a hard time arguing that Anders wasn't important to the story.
He sure does play a very important part in the story - they needed a catalyst for the coming war in the next game and Anders gave just that, so he served his purpose.
I just don't see what they could do interesting with him anymore, especially since he's dead in many playthroughs.
As for popularity : look at the "most hated companion" - threads, Anders is named more often than any other character. And since you compare with Fenris : as of today, Anders' thread has about 700 pages and 75 000 hits, while Fenris' has 1440 pages and approaches 430 000 hits, I don't know how representative that is, but it doesn't give the impression that Anders is equally as popular...
Well, Varric is cool, popular, decent person and a bro, but there is nothing much to discuss about him truly exactly because he's that decent. Almost everyone loves him. There's nothing contradictory and polarizing about him, unlike Anders or Fenris or Merril. I personally find Anders one of the most interesting characters in Dragon Age so far, and I'm pretty sure on my canon run (which I didn't yet) I'll be rivalry romancing him (as much as I can't stand his behavior sometimesEollodwyn wrote...
Found it!
I know these numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, but they show Anders to be decidedly average. To further prove Shmeep's point, Varric is so overwhelmingly favored, and his fan thread is one of the smaller ones.
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/304/index/6858999
Kazanth wrote...
Very unlikely that they'd make a DLC only available to some people. So unless Anders "gets better" I don't see it happening.
What about it?PinkShoes wrote...
Kazanth wrote...
Very unlikely that they'd make a DLC only available to some people. So unless Anders "gets better" I don't see it happening.
Witch Hunt.
Fair enough.Icy Magebane wrote...
Wait a minute, I was trying to say that since some people did kill Anders, there shouldn't be a DLC that negates that choice... The tone I had been getting from some posts was that the DLC should include Anders regardless of whether he was killed. I have no problem with them making Anders-related content that is only availible on files where he survived... I just don't want anymore Oghren, Leliana, or Awakening Anders fiascos... those are instances where character death is simply ignored (or in the case of Leliana, it might be explained later).Shinsetsu wrote...
Icy Magebane wrote...
And to people who think it's cool to resurrect characters just because you didn't kill them? That's selfish. If anything, they shouldn't be giving us those options in the first place. Try to look at the world from somebody else's perspective once in a while.
Wait...so you're saying that we should respect the choice you made (I'm assuming that you killed Anders) by not asking for DLC for post-Act 3 Anders story? But what about our choice to not kill Anders? Is it somehow less of a worthy choice because it's not what you choose?
I feel like if there is anymore DLC to be released, it should respect the following three choices: 1) Siding with the Circle or the Templars, 2) the fate of your sibling, and 3) Whether or not you killed Anders. This should work similarly to how at the start of DA2, you choose which DAO ending you had (via game save or just selecting a preset history).
Everyone's choices should be respected.
What you're proposing is fine by me.
As far as calling people selfish... it's somewhat related, so I'll explain. Regarding Leliana's resurrection, a lot of people simply claim that since "a small minority" of players killed her, it's okay to just ignore them and move on with the story. So what I was saying was really motivated by those people, and I felt it applied here as well. If that doesn't apply to whoever is reading this, at least now you know who I was referring to.
welcome to the world that ZevFans have lived in for the past year and a half.
Even suggest additional content with Zevran and you get the screams, "BUT I KILLLLLLLLEEEEED HIM!"
Modifié par Dreaming-in-Shadow, 07 avril 2011 - 03:56 .
God, that would be an amazing DLC!But a Zev DLC would have been (forgive the pun) "ridiculously awesome!" (His rise in the ranks of the crows would make a great story!)
Bioware, why do you hate us? XD
Maybe we'll be lucky and we'll get a DA2 expansion with the romances involved... (and that means more than they were in Awakenings! (the letter was hilarious though!))
Eollodwyn wrote...
God, that would be an amazing DLC!
But a Zev DLC would have been (forgive the pun) "ridiculously awesome!" (His rise in the ranks of the crows would make a great story!)
Bioware, why do you hate us? XD
Maybe we'll be lucky and we'll get a DA2 expansion with the romances involved... (and that means more than they were in Awakenings! (the letter was hilarious though!))
And I'd definitely like to see the romances involved in any expansion or Hawke-centric sequel (assuming there is one), but the fact they can all be killed makes me worry. Especially since Anders is one you can kill even if you're at max friendship/rivalry. If any are going to be excluded, I assume it would be Anders, since so many people got rid of him.
Although, now that I think of it, can you kill Isabela?
Iles wrote...
The idea of Anders-Vengeance antagonizing Hawke could be awesome, but only if they give him a chance of redemption, which is the main reason why I'd like an Anders DLC.
About the love-hate Anders topic related to some Anders DLC, my two cents.
I do understand that most people hate him because they relate fiction terrorism with real life one and I don't blame them for that.
I do also understand that writers needed a catalyst for the incoming war and Anders was the perfect victim.
What I don't understand is why people keep saying there's nothing to do with him anymore, when there would be tons of things yet to discover about him and his bond with Justice.
I demand for a way to redeem him, because though there are people who didn't like him in Awakening too, he was a good man back there and he deserves a way to be repayed for all the good things he did (like helping refugees for free, even if that meant draining himself out of mana).
Justice too deserves to be back to his former spirit self, and not that twisted version that he became with Vengeance.
He may now be psyco and single-minded, but I can't consider him "evil" and given that even the most evil foes often get a chance of redemption, why can't he?