Templars or Mages, whats your general thoughts?
#1
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 07:56
#2
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 07:57
Absurd.
Modifié par marshalleck, 18 mars 2011 - 08:00 .
#3
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:01
#4
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:05
marshalleck wrote...
I thought it was ridiculous how almost every single mage you encounter is a baby-killing, demon-summoning blood mage. Absolutely ridiculous. No nuance whatsoever, just David Gaider trying to drive home with a sledgehammer the idea that mages are soooo dangerous! Look, they are ALL evil blood mages!
Absurd.
Over zealous templars are just as dangerous as blood mages. A wonderful circle of evil and oppression we have going.
If anything DA:2 has really presented a chicken and the egg question. Who started everything? Templars or Mages
#5
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:07
It would be like locking up the offspring of criminals out of the fear that they would become criminals.
Templars should be like a roving force that hunts and punishes evil mages. Not a like prison guards.
Modifié par BobSmith101, 18 mars 2011 - 08:09 .
#6
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:13
What is most ridicolus part is that blood mage beginners think that they have uber power but once you overhelm them they crumble and beg for mercy
#7
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:16
The "evil possesed" blood mages didnt really make a pressence until act 3. Which in game time progression, was many years after Hawke's family arrived in kirkwall. In the first year, the templars and the circle disagreed and nothing more.The second year they still disagreed but the arguments and opression escalated more. This escalation was overshadowed by a certain key event.Once the event concluded, it was business as usual between the templars and circle. With the increasing grip of the templars came the desperation of the circle. When another said event happens, it " was the straw that broke the camel's back" bust the scene into an absolute free-for-all.
#8
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:19
Silencer81 wrote...
Well you must start that mages are screwed from the start. Their gift is generaly seen as curse, and most of the Chantry sees them dangerous.
What is most ridicolus part is that blood mage beginners think that they have uber power but once you overhelm them they crumble and beg for mercy
Back a mage into a corner and he'll turn to blood magic. Beat the crap out of the blood mage and he'll beg for his life. I should think they'd have a better chance for mercy if they didn't slit wrists for awesome.
#9
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:31
marshalleck wrote...
I thought it was ridiculous how almost every single mage you encounter is a puppy-kicking, demon-summoning, moustache-twirling tophat-wearing "Evil" blood mage. Absolutely ridiculous. No nuance whatsoever, just David Gaider trying to drive home with a sledgehammer the idea that mages without variation are soooo dangerous! Look, they are ALL evil blood mages, every single last one of them!
Absurd.
Except, ofcourse, that if you read the Enigma of Kirkwall notes you find the game establishes that Kirkwall has an unusually high occurence of magic and that far more mages turn to blood magic in Kirkwall than anywhere else.
Believe what you will but, without spoiling too much, the game does justify the situation with the mages.
#10
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 08:59
#11
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 09:07
Chaos_1001 wrote...
The "evil possesed" blood mages didnt really make a pressence until act 3.
Eh hem
Act 1- The First Sacrifice
#12
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 09:21
Exactly. The wohle situation at the end, where you choose the side is quite absurd. Even my somewhat anti-mage warrior was like (or wanted to be like, to be exact): "You know what? F*** you both, solve this mess yourselves. You are both crazy bastards and will have none of you!"Naitaka wrote...
I want a VTBM ending where I give Meredith and Orsino the finger and walk into the sunset...one of the most satisfying ending in RPG history imho.
#13
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 09:25
And Meredith blamed Hawke for the.....let's not resort to spoilers..... I wanted to kill her already when act 3 had just about started.
Sadly, it's about siding with the lesser of two evils.
Modifié par Gisle Aune, 18 mars 2011 - 09:25 .
#14
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:18
Deylar wrote...
Chaos_1001 wrote...
The "evil possesed" blood mages didnt really make a pressence until act 3.
Eh hem
Act 1- The First Sacrifice
I didnt say they were not in act 1. I said they didnt make a prominent presence until act 3. Perhaps I should have clarified what I said in the initial statement but I believe what I said originally was was more than adequete.
#15
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:22
Gisle Aune wrote...
I bet a rogue -- or a group of those -- having a bit of fun with his backstab could have done as much a massacre as a blood mage could.
And Meredith blamed Hawke for the.....let's not resort to spoilers..... I wanted to kill her already when act 3 had just about started.
Sadly, it's about siding with the lesser of two evils.
Indeed, and that is directly the point of act 3 ( no spoiler). Making a stand / choice and living with the consequence of that choice. One particular choice was in effect very easy for me to make the other was not.
#16
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:30
#17
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:37
Modifié par Chaos_1001, 18 mars 2011 - 01:38 .
#18
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:40
#19
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:42
Good thing there is Anders to bring reason to it all, the true champion of Kirkwall.
#20
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 01:46
Exactly because neither side seems to have no good side whatsoever, which is just ridiculous.
In the end though I chose mages because I had to, at least they are properly oppressed.
#21
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 02:09
I think in the long run I must blame the Templars, Chantry and *perhaps* even Andraste herself for the blood mage madness that we see. I think that the Templars should have indeed been instituted, but NOT the circles. The Templars should have been more like a police force than jailers, who kept vigilant watch from a distance rather than breathed down mages' necks. Almost like the Grey Wardens of Blood Mages and other evil magic users. They could have even recruited from among mages themselves and trained some arcane warrior types that fought magic with magic. And it should have then been seen as a great honor to be so recruited, and not a punishment or curse. Nothing to feel tempted to go blood mage crazy over.
If they felt that the circle was an absolute MUST, then it should have only been something used for the first formative years of a mage's life, and once he or she passed his or her harrowing, once it was proven that temptation was not a problem for the mage, they could then be released into the greater public to live their life. Also, parents, friends and families should have been given visitation rights every few months at least. Make it play out like nothing more than going away to school for a few years. Almost like Hogwarts.
#22
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 02:16
#23
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 02:18
That's how I see the issues with the Mages and the Templers, the Templers are paranoid, seeing Blood Mages under every stone. But not every Mage is a Blood Mage, many don't even care for that kind of thing.
'Judge not least you be judged'
#24
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 02:19
Nothing Hawke do matters. Why bother?
#25
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 02:26





Retour en haut







