bd223437 wrote...
The impression comes from this: "Bam. Afterwards, he makes it quite clear that he doesn't expect me to
put a ring on it. He's a himbo, and to be fair, that does square with
his backstory -- born in a brothel, raised as an assassin, recounts a
tale about sleeping with a female assassination target before carrying
out his job, etc." Taken from the article we're discussing, fifth to last paragraph directly under the pictures of a PC and Zevran following the link posted on the DA:O spoiler forum. Along with your suggestion that the player can persue monogamy, I would suggest that yes the player, as the agent, has to fight for him since he's not making it clear, to the author at least, that he is interested in monogamy. This is in contrast to the author's discussion of Leliana and Morrigan which suggests they are pushing for exclusivity at that time.
I would further suggest that even if he isn't currently prowling the nearest town or camp for a no names rendezvous, the author was left with the impression that he had such relationships in the past and that this is perfectly within his character as evidenced by the second to last paragraph: "But the casual sex, which could be used as a tool to deepen your
understanding and empathy for the other characters, tends to reinforce
the idea of women as alternately jealous, catty, smothering, and
weak-willed (easily taking back a lover that has strayed), while
perpetuating the stereotype of the promiscuous gay/bisexual man."
Presently however, if my understanding is misguided it is due to the synthesis of the information presented in this article, with particular attention paid to the portions highlighted above. This, coupled with the explanation that the comparison group of Morrigan and Leliana are, at the point in the game the article discusses, seeking monogamy sooner than Zevran leads to the understanding that you have to put in more effort for that with all other relationships being equal. I do truly appreciate you taking the time and reassuring us that monogamy is possible for all relationship opportunities.
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this and further my understanding. Also, please understand, regardless of what stereotypes are or are not embraced by any particular character, I personally do appreciate that same sex partners were included and look forward to a more complete understanding once the game is released.
I am going to kick everyone's puppies now and reveal that
none of the romances have or allow "open" relationships. To take
all the romance out of the romances and show you the mechanics:
Every single character gives you an "it's me or him/her" speech if they are in love with you and one other romance NPC is in love with you. Hitting the "love" state is what triggers the jealousy talk for all characters. Even Zevran.
More mechanics:
Everyone will take you back if you stray or tick them off a maximum of two times. After that, you're dumped. That was your failsafe so that you could pick one or two conversation options that upset them without terminating the romance irrevocably.
Depending on personality, some characters will sleep with you before they fall in love. They will give you an "I don't want to be tied down" speech. Once they fall in love, you get an, "Okay, remember how I said I didn't want to be tied down? Yeah, maybe I was wrong" speech.
They are
absolutely all scripted the same. What does this say about our portrayal of characters as weak-willed , catty, or promiscuous?
Nothing whatsoever since they are completely uniform in this regard across gender, sexuality, and personality. Computer programs. Go figure.