So...Blood Mage?
#1
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:15
But me being a blood mage fighting other blood mages made no sense whatsoever.
Why was this specialization put in the game if it had no impact on your playthrough? The arcane warrior from DAO could have just as easily been used, but wouldn't cause such glaring plot conflicting issues.
#2
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:16
#3
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:17
#4
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:20
#5
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:20
Akron1983 wrote...
Blood magic is as evil as its user.
Tell that to the Templars - they condemn every blood mage. With the exception of Jovain in DAO there aren't any good blood mages of note (and Jovain is just as questionable).
#6
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:23
Piwowarski84 wrote...
Akron1983 wrote...
Blood magic is as evil as its user.
Tell that to the Templars - they condemn every blood mage. With the exception of Jovain in DAO there aren't any good blood mages of note (and Jovain is just as questionable).
I would count Merrill as a good blood mage.
Being horribly naive isn't the same as being evil.
#7
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:23
Piwowarski84 wrote...
Akron1983 wrote...
Blood magic is as evil as its user.
Tell that to the Templars - they condemn every blood mage. With the exception of Jovain in DAO there aren't any good blood mages of note (and Jovain is just as questionable).
Still, theres nothing that says that blood magic makes you evil. Perhaps it more sought after by people with "evil" intents but blood magic itself is not evil.
#8
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:23
Taleroth wrote...
Yeah, when you pick Blood Mage you shouldn't fight other Blood Mages. You should just let them kill you.
Way to twist my words. If I was allowed to dabble with blood magic, why was I not allowed to side with blood mages? The game forces me to kill them, even though I should theoretically be leading their revolution (instead of being forced to quell it by Meredith).
RE: above - do note how you obtain the specialization in DAO - through a pact with a demon. Since DAO it has been shown that only people with questionable morals dabble in blood magic research. Even Avernus - a warden mage - was not a positive character.
Modifié par Piwowarski84, 18 mars 2011 - 10:27 .
#9
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:24
Not being able to join Thrask's revolution is a completely seperate issue from Blood Mages.Piwowarski84 wrote...
Taleroth wrote...
Yeah, when you pick Blood Mage you shouldn't fight other Blood Mages. You should just let them kill you.
Way to twist my words. If I was allowed to dabble with blood magic, why was I not allowed to side with blood mages? The game forces me to kill them, even though I should theoretically be leading their revolution (instead of being forced to quell it by Meredith).
Modifié par Taleroth, 18 mars 2011 - 10:26 .
#10
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:26
#11
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:30
#12
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:32
Piwowarski84 wrote...
Taleroth wrote...
Yeah, when you pick Blood Mage you shouldn't fight other Blood Mages. You should just let them kill you.
Way to twist my words. If I was allowed to dabble with blood magic, why was I not allowed to side with blood mages? The game forces me to kill them, even though I should theoretically be leading their revolution (instead of being forced to quell it by Meredith).
RE: above - do note how you obtain the specialization in DAO - through a pact with a demon. Since DAO it has been shown that only people with questionable morals dabble in blood magic research. Even Avernus - a warden mage - was not a positive character.
The pact with a demon is not required to use Blood Magic, as far as I know. If someone knows for sure feel free to correct me on this. But the impression I got is that blood magic is used like any other magic when using Lyrium. The blood, or life force Im guessing, is used as a substitute for lyrium.
#13
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:36
The OP is right... if it was supposed to be "evil" regardless of the user's intent, then it didn't need to be a spec. I'm glad it was however, because blood magic owns.
#14
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:39
#15
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:46
I should have just quoted that... and another comment or two with a similar point...Valentia X wrote...
Game mechanics and probably some dialogue options. I guess it's there for people who really want to rebel within the game?
Anyway, I agree completely that chosing the spec should have mattered. I don't really know what more to say... they dropped the ball. This game could have, and probably should have, had a lot more depth and variation. Don't make a game about mages vs. templars if being a mage has no effect on the storyline... or at least explain why nobody cared when I used blood magic all over town, right in front of city guards, etc.
Modifié par Icy Magebane, 18 mars 2011 - 10:47 .
#16
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:47
#17
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:48
#18
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:51
This.Akron1983 wrote...
Piwowarski84 wrote...
Taleroth wrote...
Yeah, when you pick Blood Mage you shouldn't fight other Blood Mages. You should just let them kill you.
Way to twist my words. If I was allowed to dabble with blood magic, why was I not allowed to side with blood mages? The game forces me to kill them, even though I should theoretically be leading their revolution (instead of being forced to quell it by Meredith).
RE: above - do note how you obtain the specialization in DAO - through a pact with a demon. Since DAO it has been shown that only people with questionable morals dabble in blood magic research. Even Avernus - a warden mage - was not a positive character.
The pact with a demon is not required to use Blood Magic, as far as I know. If someone knows for sure feel free to correct me on this. But the impression I got is that blood magic is used like any other magic when using Lyrium. The blood, or life force Im guessing, is used as a substitute for lyrium.
Its just using your blood (or others. BAD!) instead of lyrium to power your spells, but Blood Magic poses a another threat in that you can use it as a form of mind control which makes it to dangerous to be practiced because in the wrong hands it can be huge trouble.
Modifié par TexasToast712, 18 mars 2011 - 10:52 .
#19
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:53
I mean if i'm a practitioner of the same thing these people are using, and i've done just about every "evil" choice I could in the game, such as bargaining with the demon and reading the evil tome and specing in blood magic, I don't see why the dialog and story wouldn't adjust accordingly.
#20
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 10:55
TexasToast712 wrote...
Its dangerous in that Blood magic allows the mage to control the minds of others. THAT is why its dangerous.
It does that of course, but to me (I am a historian) it really comes down the question of do the ends justify the means? Ah, the question with no objective answer. I freaking love those kinds of questions.
#21
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 11:00
It makes your party unkillable.
#22
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 11:03
SmokeyTheBear wrote...
That's why you roll Force Mage and Spirit Healer.
It makes your party unkillable.
So do endless ability points from Maker's Sigh -.- Had I known about the bug before using the potion I would have planned my character up more carefully. That said - this is only true if your party is made up of high constitution characters. Getting 'Unstoppable' on Hard was a **** when assassins and casters would oneshot kill the more fragile of my party members (rogues and Anders to be specific).
Modifié par Piwowarski84, 18 mars 2011 - 11:06 .
#23
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 11:11
As for evil, it could go either way. Way too much about Blood Magic is told by the POV of the people involved.
#24
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 11:19
#25
Posté 18 mars 2011 - 11:22
I think they want you to be able to play the class, for the lulz or whatever.
But they don't really want you to 'roleplay' a bloodmage.





Retour en haut






