MortalEngines wrote...
Maybe in Kirkwall but Fereldan is a very different story. The Magi Origin shreds some light on this, templars have very little input in the life of the mages, they stand there to guard and make sure nothing goes sour in the circle. But most of what the mages do is dictates by the First Enchater and the Senior Enchanters, Gregoire pretty much sits back and allows Irving to take control, only stepping in if he feels something is wrong.
I don't agree with your opinion here. We see Greagoir override Irving. He tells Irving to stop talking to the mage protagonist during the Harrowing, he's shuts down Duncan's request (i.e. who was sent on behalf of the King of Ferelden during a Blight), and all the Senior Enchanters are ready to initially side with Uldred at the promise of freedom from the Chantry as Wynne herself admits. If Irving had as much authority as you think, Greagoir would have been overridue when he only permitted seven mages to go to Ostagar despite the King's quest for more troops and Irving's support for more mages being sent to fight the darkspawn.
MortalEngines wrote...
Even Tranquility on Jowan was no allowed till both Gregoire and Irving had signed for approval. The only restraints on Mages is to never marry and to never leave (though sometimes this is wavered anyway). I would hardly call this slavery, especially seeing as a mage having childern normally results on more mages. The lack of contact with family is also for the Mages sake, the circle has to become there life, removing family ties allows them to fully understand that the Circle is their life now and their past life no longer means anything. Also the fact that family members can be abusive (like Jowan's mother) or attempt to help the mages escape.
This is inaccurate. Irving admits he
never even saw the evidence in question against Jowan, and he reveals he has no say in the matter. He tells the mage protagonist that "if it were up to me, things would be different, but the Chantry..." specifically because First Enchanter Irving had no say over the matter.
MortalEngines wrote...
Not all mages are a) Completely Guiltless
Against the circle.
The fact is mages DO turn to blood magic, to abominition, DON'T go through something like a harrowing without the circle. All it takes is a mages emotions to run high or go amock and BAM a demon comes to make a contract, normally using mind control to persuade the mage.
Yet we have societies that don't endorse imprisoning mages as a rule, and they weren't destroyed by blood mages or abominations. We know the Dalish clans have mages, as do the Chasind tribes. We know that the town of Haven had free mages, and there was no magocracy there when Kolgrim (a non-mage Reaver) was in charge. We know the nation of Rivain has its witches and seers. Are they better than the Andrastian societies? Impossible to say when we know so little about them, but so far we're encountered abominations and the Circle hasn't really cut back on the number of them. The argument about blood magic and abominations in Kirkwall is pretty much a "chicken and egg" argument where we could argue in circles over whether it happens because of the Chantry and its templars, or the other way around, but I doubt we'll reach a consensus.
MortalEngines wrote...
Also you do know that some mages WANT to be come tranquil? There was that mage praying in the Magi Origins, talking about how she hated magic and wish to be rid of it. And considers becoming tranquil if you suggest it to her.
She's been indocturinated to see magic as evil and mages deserving of death, as she openly admits when you return to Ostagar during "A Broken Circle" and she prays for death.
MortalEngines wrote...
Power corruption happens everywhere, that is the a fault with society rather than exclusively the circles. The right of annulment can only be done at the LAST moment when everything has gone to hell (which in both cases it has been called upon so far, is the case). Not to mention Meredith actually broke protocol because she didn't wait for the Divine to authorize it. Many members of the Chantry and Templars are bothered by it (like Samson, Cullen and Thrask) and don't approve of it at all.
It's certainly not exclusive to the Chantry controlled Circles, but it's an issue that exists because the templars and the Chantry control the Circle. When we hear how a mage is getting raped because the templar is threatening to turn him tranquil if he says anything, it's a form of abuse that exists because of the system in place.
MortalEngines wrote...
Two important facts, they have 2 mages, this is vastly different from many thousand in one country. Secondly, the Dalish are even harsher than the templars, rather than using tranquility you are killed right off the bat. (some people might say dying is better, but that's not the point).
You're outright killed if you're an abomination, not if you're a mage. Remember Aneirin the Healer? Remember Velanna and Merrill wondering who the new First would be from their own clans?
MortalEngines wrote...
Well the first half is what the Circle does anyway. As for the families, I explained the reasons before, Mages can never intergrete with normal life because firstly, alot of people fear and want them dead and secondly because it would make them more likely to fall into temptations. And it's not isolation, mages have formed their own groups and their own way of life. Many mages enjoy their life in the Chantry, heck even Bethany enjoys being at the circle and that's KIRKWALL'S CHANTRY.
Haven has mages and non-mages integrating. The Dalish clans and the Chasind tribes have people integrating. The people of Rivain refuse to be parted from their seers. Plenty of people in Kirkwall appreciated Anders because he was healing the sick and delivering babies, and were willing to kill Hawke to defend him. And I don't think avoiding abusive templars and realizing how little freedom she has means Bethany is happy at the Circle.