DaneWolf wrote...
"robes of possession."
haha i never noticed that. i guess bioware likes to leave hints everywhere
DaneWolf wrote...
"robes of possession."
Tamyn wrote...
If Morrigan wanted to take over the god-child's body wouldn't she essentially be kicking out the soul of the god and just claiming the shell of the child for herself? There would be no power left. It's the soul that's important; she wanted a newly conceived kid so the archdemon's soul could enter the baby (kicking out the human soul) without killing the body of the child.
Tamyn wrote...
If Morrigan wanted to take over the god-child's body wouldn't she essentially be kicking out the soul of the god and just claiming the shell of the child for herself? There would be no power left. It's the soul that's important; she wanted a newly conceived kid so the archdemon's soul could enter the baby (kicking out the human soul) without killing the body of the child.
Tamyn wrote...
If Morrigan wanted to take over the god-child's body wouldn't she essentially be kicking out the soul of the god and just claiming the shell of the child for herself? There would be no power left. It's the soul that's important; she wanted a newly conceived kid so the archdemon's soul could enter the baby (kicking out the human soul) without killing the body of the child.
FlintlockJazz wrote...
Tamyn wrote...
If Morrigan wanted to take over the god-child's body wouldn't she essentially be kicking out the soul of the god and just claiming the shell of the child for herself? There would be no power left. It's the soul that's important; she wanted a newly conceived kid so the archdemon's soul could enter the baby (kicking out the human soul) without killing the body of the child.
If that's the case, then why did Flemeth want Morrigan to gain experience? Wouldn't that all go the moment Flemeth moved in? Either the power of the previous inhabitant does have an effect on how powerful the possessor is after taking over or Morrigan is lying (a very strong possibility), in which case she was also lying about Flemeth wanting to possess her as well. Also, when a demon possesses a human host both souls apparently stay in the host body and either fight for dominance or merge, how do we know that maybe that's not what Flemeth does? That she doesn't actually kick out her daughters' souls but actually merges with them (though probably using the ritual to ensure that her own personality is dominant), effectively growing in power with each possessed host she takes...
Modifié par Agni108, 17 novembre 2009 - 11:47 .
Modifié par JobacNoor, 17 novembre 2009 - 11:42 .
Agni108 wrote...
I think almost everyone is completely misreading Morrigan. Bioware has pulled the wool over our eyes, and has done so brilliantly. You have to understand what Morrigan represents, symbolically. She is perhaps the deepest and most enigmatic of all the characters in the game--and will clearly play a role, at least historically, in the expansion. There are several important points to consider.
....(snip)
The story is very deep my friends...and in my opinion Bioware has created a masterpiece, where things are not as they appear on the surface. Morrigan, whom everyone thinks is "evil", may turn out to be the real "hero" of the story, who was willing to "sacrifice" her only begotten child for the salvation of the world. Does that ring a bell?
In the case where Morrigan is in "love" with the PC, she must also sacrifice her only love, for the sake of saving the world. In other words, Morrigan is not "selfish", rather she is "selfless". Like Nature Herself, she is both beautiful and potentially cruel in her one-pointed focus on maximum efficiency. What an awesome character.
Modifié par Gaspara, 17 novembre 2009 - 12:37 .
Agni108 wrote...
Gaspara, I largely agree with you. Morrigan is clearly human, and capable of human felt emotions, such as love. So she is not a perfect reflection of Nature. She is flawed like all of us. And she is definitely arrogant about what she believes to be her superior way of life, and dismissive of human frailties. Thus, I do not think Morrigan is "good" or "flawless". But I do suspect she will turn out to be the true, but largely misunderstood, hero of the story, to be revealed in the expansion. I also suspect that her "ritual" and subsequent God Child will produce unforeseen consequences, that will be both destructive and transformational--but will give the opportunity for final redemption, at a serious cost. In Bioware stories, there is no such thing as "gain without pain". All victories come with a serious price, and I suspect that Morrigan will pay a serious price for her actions, no matter how well-intentioned they might be.
Agni108 wrote...
I think almost everyone is completely misreading Morrigan. Bioware has pulled the wool over our eyes, and has done so brilliantly. You have to understand what Morrigan represents, symbolically. She is perhaps the deepest and most enigmatic of all the characters in the game--and will clearly play a role, at least historically, in the expansion. There are several important points to consider.
1. First, Morrigan is a child of Nature. She has been raised by Flemeth, the "Witch of the Wild", who is Bioware's dark version of "Mother Nature". Nature does not know "good" or "evil". It only knows maximum efficiency. Physics thus tells us that all of Nature operates according to the law of least action = maximum efficiency. Nature is not all flowers and butterflies. It can also be heartless and cruel. But it always operates according to the law of maximum efficiency.
2. As a child of Nature, who was raised in the Wilds, far away from human habitation, Morrigan is alien to the false illusions of human society, with its flimsy notions of "good" and "evil". Morrigan is not "evil", nor is she "good". She transcends "good" and "evil". Remember, that (according to the Bible) Adam and Eve "fell" from grace because they tasted of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
At no point, does one get the notion that Morrigan is some power hungry maniac. She does not revel in killing for killing's sake. Nor is she interested in "power" for self-aggrandizment. She is only interested in accomplishing the goal of saving the world, as quickly and practially as possible. Any attempt by the PC to "help" others, by putting putting the party at risk, or delaying the primary goal, is thus frowned upon by her. The fate of the world hangs in the balance, and that is her focus. She sees the forest, and does not want to be distracted by individual trees.
3. Flemeth also transcends good and evil. Remember that Flemeth "protected" the treaties for centuries, encouraged the party to gather the allies to fight the Blight, and offered Morrigan to help in the fight. Flemeth is clearly against the Blight. She hates the "dark taint" that it brings to the world. She may have taken on the "taint" in order to conquer it...as have the Gray Wardens. At no point does she threaten the PC, except when she herself is attacked.
4. Flemeth had two Grimoires. The first, found in the Circle, outlined her own history, which involved attaining semi-immortality by possessing the bodies of her daughters. While this may seem repugnant, it may have had a deeper purpose--revealed in the second Grimoire, found at her house, after Flemeth was slain. After Morrigan reads the second Grimoire, she learns of the "ritual" which is capable of binding the soul of an Old God to the body of her child. Ostensibly, Flemeth discovered this ritual through her research over the centuries, and that research was probably the reason she needed to continue her studies over the long course of time.
5. The Old Gods, represent the Gods of Nature, who have been corrupted by the "taint" and thus transformed into Archdemons. I believe that Flemeth sought, through her research, some way to redeem the Old Gods, and thus "redeem" all of Nature. When Morrigan fully understood what Flemeth was trying to accomplish, she changed her view, and decided that she had to fulfill her Mother's plan. If she did not do this, the world was ultimately doomed in the long run. I believe that the goal of both Flemeth and Morrigan was thus to finally and completely remove the taint from the land, and restore the Balance in Nature. They have a bigger picture of things than ordinary humanity, which is only concerned with this particular Blight.
6. This is the perfect set up for an expansion, which will likely revolve around the God Child of Morrigan, who will be faced with the task of "redeeming" Nature, and removing the taint once and for all...but who will also be faced with his/her dual history....as an Old God and as an Archdemon...now in human form. Will the God Child succumb to the taint, and thus become a new Archdemon in human form, or will he/she undergo final salvation and become a God of Balance in human form? Stay tuned...this story is not over.
The story is very deep my friends...and in my opinion Bioware has created a masterpiece, where things are not as they appear on the surface. Morrigan, whom everyone thinks is "evil", may turn out to be the real "hero" of the story, who was willing to "sacrifice" her only begotten child for the salvation of the world. Does that ring a bell?
In the case where Morrigan is in "love" with the PC, she must also sacrifice her only love, for the sake of saving the world. In other words, Morrigan is not "selfish", rather she is "selfless". Like Nature Herself, she is both beautiful and potentially cruel in her one-pointed focus on maximum efficiency. What an awesome character.
Antikristine wrote...
I also applaud Agni108's post. It's well argued and well reasoned. But I also thing Gaspara has some points in his/her counterargument.
All since we first met Morrigan and Flemeth, I haven't been able to shake off the feeling that there's some kind of special bond between the two. That they maybe are two incarnations of the same power in a sense. While it goes well with Agni108's Christian allegory, I get the feeling something different is going on. What if the story Morrigan tells you about Flemeth's plans is not true? What if it is a greater scheme they made up together? Maybe Flemeth's soul can't be passed on as long as she is alive, and that's where Morrigan's baby enters the picture? Which would mean that Flemeth would have a new, godly body in exchange for the old one.
In any respect, Morrigan (and maybe Flemeth) is not out of the story yet. I'm certain she'll appear one way or the other in an expansion or a sequel. The most dangerous enemies are of course the ones you don't know whether you can trust or not.
Modifié par Ellzedd, 17 novembre 2009 - 01:31 .
Modifié par marshalleck, 17 novembre 2009 - 01:55 .
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
This is all pointless speculation. We don't know if Morrigan is even capable of possessing the spirit of an Old God. Flemeth takes control of the body, but not the spirit.
So even if Morrigan wants to take control of the kid's body, she cannot take control of his divine spirit. That is assuming she can even possess the body of an Old God.
Agni108 wrote...
The child does not have the "body" of an Old God. It has the body of a human child.
The soul that is bound to it (in the womb) is supposed to be that of an Old God, which had been tainted and assumed the form of an Archdemon. I doubt that either Morrigan or Flemeth have the power to push the soul of an Old God out of that body and thus possess it. The implication is that the child was not conceived for Morrigan or Flemeth to possess. It was concieved to be a vehicle for the soul of an Old God, and to set up the premise for the expansion. Morrigan and Flemeth are just catalysts. The Blights are caused by the taint that has infected the Old Gods. To get rid of the Blight, the Old Gods must be redeemed. Perhaps Flemeth and Morrigan have found a way....we will see.
Seriously? I doubt anyone, a character in a fantasy game or not, would do something so drastic just to snuff a religion.Flamin Jesus wrote...
I don't think ending the Darkspawn threat is particularly high on her to-do list, if Archdemons really ARE old gods (Which we can assume) there are only 2 more Archdemons to destroy/free before the Darkspawn turn into an unorganized heap of bodies that is, at its worst, a threat to the dwarves.
If you press her for an explanation, she says something about the child bringing the promise of freedom or some such, which I suppose means that she's planning to revive the worship of at least this one old god as a direct opposition to the Chantry, which she obviously views as the true enemy, since they won't go away on their own (The Darkspawn on the other hand will, eventually).
Modifié par Rattleface, 17 novembre 2009 - 02:57 .