CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
I'm not going to argue that Anders' single-mindedness isn't frustrating. If I were my Warden, I'd tell Anders "I once knew a Templar who had as little choice in his lot as you did in yours. He joined the Wardens to escape, too." When it comes to personal misfortunes, Brosca would laugh in his face, as would Tabris. Mahariel would smile sadly at him and shake her head at the general follies of human society. Yes, everyone is afflicted by hardships, some more than others.
But the tone of Seb's voice when he goes into his little "none of us are free" rant is maddeningly condescending. Even if you view that dialogue as kindly as you can, even if you don't think he's declaring all their respective misfortunes to be equivalent, it sounds like he is. Anders would have given anything to be as free as Sebastian, or Hawke and... in fact... did; first accepting the Warden's bargain, and then later sacrificing his very humanity.
I like Sebastian, and I want to like him more, but the boy needs to learn to take a critical eye to his own value system. So does Anders, sure... but Anders is a bag of broken things, driven insane by the trap that is his life, steadily breaking more and throwing himself onto the pyre that is his cause because that's the only way out. I can forgive him some of his excesses because of that damage. Sebastian is a completely functional human being whose main problem is a surfeit of choices. I'm not upset with Seb because he's a terrible person, but rather because he's so much less than he can be, and what's holding him back seems so... surmountable. I kept hoping that Sebastian would be the thing I think the narrative needs: a devout Andrastean who can see the flaws in the modern Chantry and work to change them from within. Instead, I get just another apologist, and it's maddening. My Hawke was a devout Andrastean going in to the game and wanted nothing more in the world than to turn the Chantry and the Templar order into the force for unambiguous good she believed it had the potential to be. By the middle of Act 3 she's convinced that such a thing is impossible, and part of that is because of Sebastian... and Elthina. If he represents the best the Chantry has to offer, the purest and most good, and he can't even tell that there's something WRONG in Kirkwall, then what hope is there for white Andrasteism?
Love Anders or hate him, I don't understand how you can look at what he is and not see a victim of a broken system. If you see him as a monster, he wasn't one when he went into the circle. Even if he's irredeemable now, the circumstances that broke a man that badly need to be changed. That's what I would like to have heard Seb express, even if it had been with contempt... some level of admission that not every thing the Chantry has ever done is automatically correct, that some serious problems might exist within.
Maybe I'm expecting too much from poor Sebastian. I just want to meet one non-mage devout Andrastean (other than my Hawke) who displays a capability for critical thinking while maintaining their faith. Is that too much to ask?
I didn't hear any 'tone' in that line, personally. Sebastian's VA does that over-emphasizing thing a lot and sometimes on completely meaningless lines, so I don't think there was any special hidden attitude there.
As for changing the Chantry from within, it's kind of hard to be devout and at the same time deny the absolute, 'Maker-given' power the Chantry leaders possess. To try and change the Chantry is to deny the teachings of the Chantry, which is something a devout follower would never do. For someone whose faith is strong enough for them to dedicate their entire
life to it, most of the time they've already lost the ability to form objective criticism.
And the thing is, it's hard to change things from the inside when you're on the level of common Chantry brother. Where he stands, he's doing all the right things. The corruption comes from the higher ups, not the sisters and brothers of the faith devoted to charity and kindness. He could argue with Elthina, but that didn't help Hawke, did it? It didn't help Orsino or anyone else.
As for Anders, I don't want to get off-subject with a rant. I'll just say, the Ferelden Circle was a cakewalk in comparison to Kirkwall. Anders had it
good.There's always someone who had a tougher life, but Anders acts like his was the absolute worst. That is the problem with him. And it wasn't the Circle that made him a monster, he did that when he chucked his 'get out of jail free' card with the Wardens to become
possessed, and subsequently lost himself to the madness of a singular, unrelenting idea.
EDIT: Just adding, I don't really think the narrative needed a character to point out the Chantry's flaws. Most everyone seems to hate it as is. I think the whole point of Sebastian was to highlight that there is a good side to the Chantry, but some people seem to think he
can't be good unless he distances himself from the Chantry, because 'the Chantry is bad'.
Modifié par Aris Ravenstar, 04 août 2011 - 07:01 .