Aller au contenu

Photo

Sebastian... could I hate you any more than I already do?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
219 réponses à ce sujet

#126
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

phyreblade74 wrote...

Uh, nope, wouldn't kill my kids.  But I would die for them.  Who do you think it's easier for me to relate to?

I've already disagreed with you about the harm done.  There is no hunky-dory ending to Merrill's story; lots of people were hurt. 


Marethari can get killed because she willingly becomes an abomination, and the members of the clan get killed if they try to murder Merrill and Hawke in cold blood.

phyreblade74 wrote...

You're saying it has nothing at all to do with Merrill's choice-making, and I don't agree with you, for reasons I've repeated several times. 


It doesn't change that these people you're addressing were adults who made their own choices, they are responsible for their own actions.

phyreblade74 wrote...

I end my story telling Merrill she can continue seeking Elven history in numerous ways aside from the Mirror and she admits she'd never really thought of that; which, to me, is telling.


You mean she can try to stumble upon an answer instead of being proactive about it; considering how many centuries it has been since the invasion of the Dales, I don't imagine she will be any more successful than the multitude of Dalish elves who have trapped Thedas for generations.

phyreblade74 wrote...

Don't know how many circles you wish to go in, in regards the different ways we see the tale.  I've said what I think.  Merrill is a rather cute and somewhat stupid character; she makes me laugh; but she's not my favorite character and I generally leave her behind when I'm grouping. 


I think Merrill demonstrates her intellect numerous times, and shows she's cautious when she asks Hawke to accompany her to Sundermount in Act III.

#127
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

phyreblade74 wrote...

Ya lost me.  Marethari never tries to kill Merrill.  That oh-so-helpful demon Merrill trusted enough to visit repeatedly does try to kill Merrill, however. 


Abomination Marethari does try to kill Merrill, and Marethari made the decision to become an abomination and tell no one about it until Hawke and Merrill came to the mountain.

phyreblade74 wrote...

Which highlights WHY demonic interaction is worth fearing.  Examples of possessed people are described throughout Dalish lore and myth; with Merrill herself indicating Clans hunt down possessed Keepers when they're overtaken by demons.  She knew better and did as she wanted, regardless, then blamed those around her for being afraid.  But their fear isn't the problem, they should be afraid.


Marethari is making them fear that Merrill could be tainted by the Eluvian, which we know is false because the elves in the Elven Ruins were corrupted because of the shards of the Eluvian while Merrill remains the same years later. Despite all the fear that Marethari is placing in the elves by poisoning them against Merrill, the Keeper tells Merrill that she can come back to the clan.

phyreblade74 wrote...

(1)  The Wardens admit they do "whatever it takes".  They never say the Joining is "good".  They warn against recruitment, in fact, and choose their recruits very very carefully.  "It's not a cure but a calling."  Duncan says, "The Joining is dangerous."  Apparently, they regard it as it should be regarded -- dangerous as any magic is dangerous and to be treated accordingly.


I'd say it's good. The Joining is the reason that the darkspawn don't destroy all of humanity and the other sentient races of Thedas still exist - all due to blood magic via The Joining Ritual. It's the reason people aren't being eaten alive and why women aren't getting violated across the continent, and it's the reason that the Archdemons can be stopped.

phyreblade74 wrote...

(2) Make sure to tell those Wardens Avernus experimented on with blades until they were dead how harmless his blood magic proved to be.


No one said blood magic couldn't be abused, and people can get hurt without blood magic. Didn't you say your Hawke sided with the templars? What does your Hawke say to all the men, women, and children your Hawke had brutally murdered by siding with Meredith in an act of genocide?

phyreblade74 wrote...

(3)  I don't believe the Eluvian was harmless, either, for reasons already described.


You mean the fact that it was previously tainted, which is no longer the case?

Modifié par LobselVith8, 29 mai 2011 - 02:39 .


#128
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

phyreblade74 wrote...


Both Marethari and Merrill used what understandings they possessed to make choices that ended up hurting people.  You can't say Marethari is an idiot but not Merrill, as if Merrill knew so much better than Marethari; she didn't.  They knew, basically, about the same.  Wait, Marethari actually knew MORE, being older and more experienced a Keeper. 



So the person who refused to study the mirror as we found out in Origins knows more about the mirror than the person who spent 7 years studying lore and information she gathered from various sources, some more than likely being Tevinter? Ok..... sure.....

So me, I say they were both acting equally stupid.  Merrill should've respected her elder enough to stop barrelling forward and endangering herself and Marethari should've known she couldn't truly save Merrill and gotten the Clan the heck on outta there.  Such is my own opinion.  I'm not going to agree with you anytime soon that Merrill is perfectly brilliant and EVERYONE around her was just too dumb to see it, nope.


Sure, respect your elder even when she turns your whole entire clan against you by spreading baseless lies about a danger that no longer exists and said elder knows that you've made it safe. You've told her repeatedly.

I'm sorry but if you respect someone who does all that to you then there is something seriously wrong. I lost all respect for Marethari when she did that.

And what's wrong with my sentences, anyway?  Heck, I'm not even sure which "first sentance" you're referring to, lol.


The one where you said "Hey I respect your thinking Merrill is the brightest of all elves" or something along those lines. It was in the third block quote thingy I did. That one was what I didn't like.

People were hurt exactly through Merrill's actions, actually.  Had she not acted as she did, there would've been nothing to fear and, thus, no harm.  Mind you, the Dalish (and everyone) have every reason in the world to fear blood magic and demonic possession; there are plenty of instances where violent rampages and terrible circumstances prove there's plenty to fear from such chances and possibilities.  It's a Keeper's responsibility to "remember" such things and direct the Clan accordingly. 


*facepalm*

Merrill cleansed the shard of the taint and in doing so made it perfectly safe! There was no reason to fear her or the Eluvian shard at that point! The fact that Blood Magic actually cleansed something of the taint proves that blood magic isn't evil.

It's also a Keeper's responsibility to remember anything and everything about elven society, even if it may be dangerous at first.

Begging and choosing never went hand in hand. -- Carver Hawke.

The Keeper only wants to remember the safe things and said that the Eluvians were better left to a forgotten time. She's effectively ignoring the duty she and all other Keepers said they would do.

Redcliffe comes to mind, just for one. So does the Brecelian Forest, with all its sundry spirits inhabiting rampaging trees and werewolves attacking Dalish. Just seems most people in Thedas have experience enough to say it's not particularly wise to invite demons into your life using blood magic; bad stuff normally follows.


Redcliffe had no instances of blood magic being used save for if you kill Isolde to rescue Connor. The Brecilian Forest had no instance of blood magic either save for Zathrian binding the very forest's soul into Witherfang. Neither of those summoned demons.

Also, just because Blood Magic can summon demons doesn't mean it always does.

History and lore teaches over and over it's best and wise to avoid blood magic and demons, anyway. Merrill says she appreciates the value of history and lore, then acts in reckless disregard for its teachings. Stupid, that.


She appreciates Dalish history and lore, not Chantry propagandist teachings used to make people fear mages just because of the douches that were the Tevinter Magisters.

IOnlySignIn wrote...
^ The Joining counts as Blood Magic? Or even Magic? It can be performed without a Mage. I thought it's just like how a Warrior drinks Dragonblood to become a Reaver.


I refer you to my thread: http://social.biowar...4/index/7404632

phyreblade74 wrote...
Ya lost me.  Marethari never tries to kill Merrill.  That oh-so-helpful demon Merrill trusted enough to visit repeatedly does try to kill Merrill, however. 


The demon that, if it is in fact Audacity and not another Pride demon, was trapped for centuries and would be trapped forever unless a mage freed it using a powerful spell. Which was Marethari.

Repeatedly meaning a total of 3 times?

1) With Marethari because they kept hearing a voice and didn't know what it was, but later found out it was a demon that was trapped forever.
2) To learn blood magic from the trapped demon who couldn't harm anyone because it was trapped as Marethari said in the Merrill short story.
3) When Merrill goes to ask it for more advice, and later finds out Marethari freed the trapped demon.

The demon could do no harm to anyone because it was trapped. It could only harm people if it was freed, which was caused by Marethari.

And for the record, so it isn't used as a counterargument here: Blood Magic would not have made the Eluvian act as a gateway for Audacity to free itself. The Eluvian links to a place beyond the Fade and Thedas as Morrigan told us and the Tevinter Imperium used blood magic on the Eluvian and only got a fancy telephone between other Eluvians.


Also, if a Keeper becomes an Abomination, it's the clan's duty to slay the Keeper. But when you tell her clan this, they try to kill you.

Now, whose fault is that? It certainly isn't Merrill's for doing what her clan would've been forced to do to Marethari.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 29 mai 2011 - 08:04 .


#129
Trefalen

Trefalen
  • Members
  • 277 messages
Sebastian is the typical rich brat.. "Oh poor me" please fight for me so I can remain virtous, and you can do all the dirty work.

I want a mod where we can turn to him in the end and say "You want him dead (Anders) do it yourself" then "ZAP, frogtime" :)

Or better still "I swear I will return to Starkhaven and raise such and arm..."  Suddenly a bolt splits his wig and Varric says "What? You were going to the same thing.." (like when you try to rescue hawks mother)

Modifié par Trefalen, 29 mai 2011 - 08:14 .


#130
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
But Varric kinda likes Sebastian. He just finds him boring

#131
themonty72

themonty72
  • Members
  • 318 messages
That dud was wasted DLC ...why we couldnt have sarabass hell, however u spell it as companion.

Modifié par themonty72, 29 mai 2011 - 10:00 .


#132
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

themonty72 wrote...

That dud was wasted DLC ...why we couldnt have sarabass hell, however u spell it as companion.


I actually think Maraas will be a companion in the future. The guy you meet on The Wounded Coast and meet later on in the Hanged Man. Just a hunch.


Also, he was the only non-companion ally that actually used the same battle animations our characters used. I found it odd that they would make him use the greatsword animation but wouldn't make any of the common enemies use the new animations.

#133
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 634 messages

LilyasAvalon wrote...

He was a disappointing DLC and LI, I was over the moon when he was released but after meeting him in game and getting to know him? No thanks. =/

He had such potential too....


He was as much of a LI as Aveline was...hmm less, you can grab a kiss from Aveline at least.

He annoyed me to no ends after just one run.

Maker/Andraste forgive me battlecries...um we are fighting DEMONS Seb shut up!

Drops his current plan when a *passion* hits him.

Is apalled that the divine might level kirkwall and innocents get hurt and turns around and wants to do same if Anders is spared.

*Blind faith* (Or just Blind)

They should have had a way to talk him down in the end but whatever. Image IPB

#134
Beerfish

Beerfish
  • Members
  • 23 867 messages
He had some possibilities with his character but his inner turmoil of Chantry vs being a Prince seemed a bit weak, or rather he seemed kind of weak and wishy washy. I did like the fact that we had one character that actually stood up for the Chantry.

#135
trobbins777

trobbins777
  • Members
  • 494 messages
Sebastian is a good guy, a bit naive but he learns if you rivalry him. I think i'll address the main criticism against him. He has a perfectly good reason to want Anders dead(See killing his surrogate mother, especially after losing the rest of his family). That being said i really wanted bioware to let us hand the murder knife to Sebastian. Not because i want him to kill Anders but because I don't think he could do it. If he did he would be going against everything Elthina taught him.

Modifié par trobbins777, 30 mai 2011 - 03:36 .


#136
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8 282 messages

trobbins777 wrote...

... That being said i really wanted bioware to let us hand the murder knife to Sebastian. Not because i want him to kill Anders but because I don't think he could do it.

Oooh, I like that!

Mind you, I wouldn't hand Sebastian the murder knife because I thought he would back out, but I would do it so that Sebastian could finally take responsibility for his actions.

Sebastian is a very passionate person, but he is also a very young man. I think that in a few years, he may look back on his "execution" of Anders with regret, especially if he remembers what Elthina said about murder never being justice. It would mean more if he held the knife.

#137
Trefalen

Trefalen
  • Members
  • 277 messages
Sebastian is a big whimp. Compared to Sebastian, Anders is Rambo.

Modifié par Trefalen, 30 mai 2011 - 10:20 .


#138
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
which is why Anders lives in my playthroughs. Because he then vows to kill Anders. And ultimately when faced with the decision of whether to kill Anders or not, I have a feeling he wouldn't be able to do it because of what Elthina taught him and meant to him.

I will not bring myself to kill a man simply because someone else wishes me to when he is perfectly capable of doing it himself. Also, I justify Anders in what he did personally.

#139
KLGChaos

KLGChaos
  • Members
  • 262 messages
Not a fan of Sebastian myself. It was always " Maker this" and "Maker that". First time through, I killed Anders because I felt it was the right thing to do. Second time through, playing my Mage, who was a good guy as well, but couldn't bring himself to kill Anders, who he considered a friend, so I told him to get lost. Next thing I know Sebastian is turning his back on me despite everything I'd done for him and threatening to slaughter everyone in town with his army. I don't condone Anders actions at all, but Sebastian threatening to move an army against a town that he most likely won't even be in just blind idiocy and hated. In some ways he's WORSE than Anders because at least the latter didn't want to bring me down with him... Sebastian basically said he'd kill me. Religious zealots are the worst kinds of people.

#140
jamirflyd2

jamirflyd2
  • Members
  • 202 messages

DeaHamlet wrote...

I don't know about anyone else... but I want a DLC where Sebastian invades and I get to kill him.
I wanted to kill him so badly, it's not even funny.

Even siding with templars I was still... you bastard, bring it on!  Hawke +3 have killed entire gangs over the years, waves of darkspawn, dragons... I will decimate you and whatever army your uptight religious ass can bring.

I love the fact that he gets all preachy and in some banter Anders mocks him because he thinks Anders is single minded and yet Sebastian is all revenge and whatnots because someone killed his family.  Yet how many mages have been hunted, killed or at the very least ripped from their families and denied a family of their own?

Hypocrit! 
PS: In case anyone wonders, I only do Seb's missions for the XP, loot and money.  o.O


Until the patch that lets Anders side with the Templars comes out I hate him!Image IPB I can not see how people could support the mages when they have blood mages unless I was or people play evil! Orsino freaking turns ino a Harvester like creature and worked with the man that killed your MOTHER and I bet he knew it all along while asking for your help and support! If the mages were innocent you would never fight DEMONS when you fight then it would just be fireballs! Plus I never take sides till the very end because both sides are flawed but Templars are the lessor of two evils. I love Sebastain for standing up to Anders but I to think he is bugged because if you are his friend he should not leave you and try to get Starkhaven when you convince him to be a brother lol! Image IPB

#141
BlackLotus30

BlackLotus30
  • Members
  • 135 messages
I like Sebastian very much because he is a very nice man and compared with the other LI he is quite sane. He is the only one that is honest with Hawke from the start. I was a playing mage Hawke and I sided with the mages, even after Anders blew up the Chantry, Seb stayed with my Hawke out of loyalty to her. :P

Of course I killed Anders ;A; as much as I wanted him to live, I killed Anders out of mercy Maker's knows what tortures people would have done to him if they caught him. The only place Anders would have been "safe" would have been in the Tevinter Imperium and even that doesn't seems to be a nice place >.>

My Hawke beleived in the Chantry it had the potential to do a lot of good, a mage in the chantry would have helped and in sofar i think the main problems lies with the Templars and not the Chantry as a whole..... seems to me that alot of templars devlop "hate mages syndroms" A lot of Templars in Kirkwall seems to hate mages.

In Felderen even Gregoir seems like a not hating mage templar...and i would not call gregoir sympathetic.

#142
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

jamirflyd2 wrote...

I can not see how people could support the mages when they have blood mages unless I was or people play evil!


That odd, I see genocide against an entire population of men, women, and children for an act they aren't responsible for as evil. And are you actually blaming the hundreds of mages in the Circle of Magi for actions that are committed by criminals outside the Gallows?

jamirflyd2 wrote...

Orsino freaking turns ino a Harvester like creature and worked with the man that killed your MOTHER and I bet he knew it all along while asking for your help and support!


You mean one, single man aided a mentally unbalanced man? How does that make genocide acceptable? If giving aid to Quentin makes Orsino a monster, what does it make Hawke to aid Meredith murder hundreds of innocent people who aren't guilty of the act Anders alone is responsible for?

jamirflyd2 wrote...

If the mages were innocent you would never fight DEMONS when you fight then it would just be fireballs!


You realize the Veil is weak in Kirkwall, as addressed by the "Band of Three," which is why demons are all over the place, including in the Deep Roads.

jamirflyd2 wrote...

Plus I never take sides till the very end because both sides are flawed but Templars are the lessor of two evils.


The Knight-Commander who demands an act of genocide is the lesser of two evils?

#143
BlueMew

BlueMew
  • Members
  • 262 messages

trobbins777 wrote...
That being said i really wanted bioware to let us hand the murder knife to Sebastian.

I just wished we could have left the murder knife in Sebastian instead. ("Oh? Come back with an army? I think not...")
Failing that, I'll just stick with not downloading him. As if I want some arrogant Chantry-sodden fool follow me around.

#144
Taraberra

Taraberra
  • Members
  • 24 messages
I'd rather have Sebastian in my party than Anders though. At least Sebastian can stop whining at times and just have a bland conversation. That, and Sebastian seems like her could be corrupted so easily from his Chantry lifestyle since he already was into all the vices Isabella dabbles in. But his preachings do get annoying, just like any of the Chantry people. I wish there was an option to say "GTFO" to Sebastian even if you kill Anders at the end... /sigh

#145
casedawgz

casedawgz
  • Members
  • 2 864 messages

Trefalen wrote...

Sebastian is the typical rich brat.. "Oh poor me" please fight for me so I can remain virtous, and you can do all the dirty work.

I want a mod where we can turn to him in the end and say "You want him dead (Anders) do it yourself" then "ZAP, frogtime" :)

Or better still "I swear I will return to Starkhaven and raise such and arm..."  Suddenly a bolt splits his wig and Varric says "What? You were going to the same thing.." (like when you try to rescue hawks mother)


That was thing. I wanted a "If you want him dead, go ahead" option. Intellectually I knew that Anders deserved to die, but since he'd saved Bethany's life in the Deep Roads, I wasn't going to be the one to do it.

#146
PrinceLionheart

PrinceLionheart
  • Members
  • 2 597 messages
I haven't gotten the Sebastian DLC yet, so correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Sebastian have friends in the Chantry? The same Chantry Anders decided to bomb because he felt a war was the only way to gain rights for mages?

From my standpoint, whether you agree with Anders or not, Sebastian has every right to be pissed the hell off and swear vengeance. So how is Sebastian the bad guy in that scenario?

#147
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8 282 messages

PrinceLionheart wrote...

I haven't gotten the Sebastian DLC yet, so correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Sebastian have friends in the Chantry? The same Chantry Anders decided to bomb because he felt a war was the only way to gain rights for mages?

From my standpoint, whether you agree with Anders or not, Sebastian has every right to be pissed the hell off and swear vengeance. So how is Sebastian the bad guy in that scenario?

Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is the same Chantry that has been condoning the illegal tranquilizing of mages during Meredith's watch. Because it's illegal under Chantry law to perform the Rite of Tranquility on Harrowed mages. Yet Ethina is aware of it and does nothing. Anders has friends that were made Tranquil, i.e. severed from the Fade forever and possibly denied even an afterlife, because Elthina decided that compelling Meredith to follow established Chantry laws was too much like work. And that's being charitable. The cynical version has Elthina condoning Meredith's actions, rather than just being too lazy to stop them. So if you are going ot argue that someone has a right to enact vengeance because they had friends who were damaged, the wrongs done against Sebastian were trivial compared to the wrongs done against all Circle mages, and those who were willing to stand up for them.

Modifié par berelinde, 01 août 2011 - 03:33 .


#148
Sealy

Sealy
  • Members
  • 1 178 messages

berelinde wrote...

PrinceLionheart wrote...

I haven't gotten the Sebastian DLC yet, so correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Sebastian have friends in the Chantry? The same Chantry Anders decided to bomb because he felt a war was the only way to gain rights for mages?

From my standpoint, whether you agree with Anders or not, Sebastian has every right to be pissed the hell off and swear vengeance. So how is Sebastian the bad guy in that scenario?

Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is the same Chantry that has been condoning the illegal tranquilizing of mages during Meredith's watch. Because it's illegal under Chantry law to perform the Rite of Tranquility on Harrowed mages. Yet Ethina is aware of it and does nothing. Anders has friends that were made Tranquil, i.e. severed from the Fade forever and possibly denied even an afterlife, because Elthina decided that compelling Meredith to follow established Chantry laws was too much like work. And that's being charitable. The cynical version has Elthina condoning Meredith's actions, rather than just being too lazy to stop them. So if you are going ot argue that someone has a right to enact vengeance because they had friends who were damaged, the wrongs done against Sebastian were trivial compared to the wrongs done against all Circle mages, and those who were willing to stand up for them.


Not denying that Anders had his reasons, though I don't condone exploding buildings unless you plan on walking away in slow motion while it lights up the background. Anders having more reason to be angry doesn't make it any less logical for Sebastian to get angry.

I probably would have liked Sebastian more if I liked religion more, unfortunatly he seems a bit too much on the extremist side, reminds me too much of the church going days. Image IPB 

#149
PrinceLionheart

PrinceLionheart
  • Members
  • 2 597 messages

berelinde wrote...

PrinceLionheart wrote...

I haven't gotten the Sebastian DLC yet, so correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Sebastian have friends in the Chantry? The same Chantry Anders decided to bomb because he felt a war was the only way to gain rights for mages?

From my standpoint, whether you agree with Anders or not, Sebastian has every right to be pissed the hell off and swear vengeance. So how is Sebastian the bad guy in that scenario?

Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is the same Chantry that has been condoning the illegal tranquilizing of mages during Meredith's watch. Because it's illegal under Chantry law to perform the Rite of Tranquility on Harrowed mages. Yet Ethina is aware of it and does nothing. Anders has friends that were made Tranquil, i.e. severed from the Fade forever and possibly denied even an afterlife, because Elthina decided that compelling Meredith to follow established Chantry laws was too much like work. And that's being charitable. The cynical version has Elthina condoning Meredith's actions, rather than just being too lazy to stop them. So if you are going ot argue that someone has a right to enact vengeance because they had friends who were damaged, the wrongs done against Sebastian were trivial compared to the wrongs done against all Circle mages, and those who were willing to stand up for them.


I actually never explicitly stated whether Anders was right or wrong, just that Sebastian had every right to blow up  (ha!) the way he did after what Anders did. I just think it's rather silly that people villainize Sebastian for having such a response.

#150
PinkShoes

PinkShoes
  • Members
  • 1 268 messages
yeah i didnt like him either