Actually what Cullen is talking about is recending the Right of Annulment which it seems Knight Commande has the right to do. After which it becomes a normal Templar action - e.g. kill those mages endangerous others. Under the Annulment is called you kill every mage. Even Gregory in DA:O makes that distinction. It is like nuking a city because a highly contagious thing is beyond control.Actually, one of the most surprising moments for me in the game was during the templar ending, when I found out that even the Right of Annulment is supposed to authorize the templars to only kill blood mages and maleficar, not every mage, and that Meredith was doing it wrong.
You know who said that? Cullen. When he pointed out that Greagoir letting Irving and Wynne and the others live, despite a Right of Annulment having already been called, was still perfectly legal.
Cullen: "The Right has always been a last resort, when every mage involved was beyond salvation. The situation was far more dire in Ferelden's Circle, and yet many mages were saved. We could still do as much here."
You make it sound like anyone who believes in something being more important than life is a mindless indoctrinated and abused victim since childhood.Weltenschlange wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Even the Saarebas of the Qunari submit themselves willingly to their duty in the Qun. They accept their role.
[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/pouty.png[/smilie]
Sure, they submit themselves willingly and accept their role.
As far as a heavily conditioned abuse victim that has been indoctrinated since childhood can actually do that.
Like that Kid who stood infront of the tank in Tianmen square is abused and indoctrinated since childhood. He chose death over life for something he believes in.
Modifié par JamesX, 24 mars 2011 - 01:10 .





Retour en haut




