EmperorSahlertz wrote...
If you want something you can get it, given time. Hell, in some cases, if you want it bad enough, you can just take it. All of that is prevented by the Qun, as it gives you the job you will excel at.
Just ignoring the part about Tal-Vashoth, are we?
It gives you the job they
think you will excel at; they have no more guarantee of being right about it than you do.
The Tamassrans have evaluated you for 12 years before they assign your duty, which is plenty of time to get a good sense of your skills, what you like and what you dislike.
Those 'twelve years' in question are from birth to age 12, note.
And you know what? Even in our messy horrible human system, you're generally not expected to have your life's career set in stone while still in
grade school. We generally give you , like, 18-20 years or so to make up your mind... and then we allow you to make it up again if it turns your first idea was no fun.
Seriously, who could have observed you at age 12 and figured out what you'd be best at? What you were doing best with at that age? Same thing that's your greatest aptitude now? And is that also true for everyone around you, or just you?
Seriously. You are giving the qunari the ability to watch grade-school children at work and know exactly what kind of people they're going to grow up into and what their best skills will be. Dude, we can't do that in the real world, and we have modern psychology, aptitude tests, and computer-assisted motion analysis. So I
really doubt a bunch of medieval fantasy priests just using their eyeballs are going to even equal the 21st century's error rate, let alone improve on it.
Out of all the information they've gathered, they pick a profession best suited you. And the Qunari never claimed to be perfect.
Then they lose all right to make all my choices for me.
The
only reason that would remotely make sense for giving up your free will is if the person you're giving it up for can guarantee -- not just promise, but
guarantee -- that you'll make out way better on the equation. If the people who want to control my life are as mortal and fallible as I am? Then ahahahahhahaha, **** no. If mistakes are going to be made either way, then I'll stick with my
own mistakes, thank you.
They strive to be, but as they are just mortal, they can never achieve it, but neither can any society, though they all strive to be perfect. So I fail to see how you can hold the Qunari at fault for not being perfect, when nothing is.
*points up at his previous paragraph* Kinda like that.
Also, there is a trope in fiction called the Omniscient Morality License, where actions that would normally be considered immoral for most people (such as, oh, running the totalitarian state) are still justified because they have enough foreknowledge to be in complete control of the outcome. To quote TVTropes:
"Basically, they can do
anything to the hero and still be considered one of the good guys, because they just
know it will turn out okay."
But here's the thing. You can't use the Omniscient Morality License defense unless you are indeed omniscient. If you're as mortal as the rest of us? Then you lose that justification.
To bring things back on point, your entire justification of the Qun is that it would do better at making everyone's life choices for them than those people themselves would. That's pretty much the same thing as claiming that they never, ever **** up, dude (because, of course, the main criticism against letting people make their own choices is that they
do sometimes **** up). But that's not a claim anyone can back.