That really has nothing in common with Merrill's actions directly causing the actions of her storyline. Anders did not do anything in this game because of Greagoir.
Of course he did. Greagoir should have used his powers to be able to see six years in the future and know that the end result of his not killing Anders for his flagrant apostate-ness would be Anders going abomination and killing people. After all, going abomination and killing people is an entirely foreseeable result of letting an apostate run around too long! Ask any templar in Kirkwall! You should expect it!
In case you hadn't figured this out yet, that was sarcasm. The problem is, the whole 'it's Merrill's fault that Merethari died' logic is the
exact same brand of logical fail. Its blaming Merrill for not being able to look seven years into the damn future, when she starts her experiments, and see that the 'inevitable' ending is Marethari whoring herself out to Audacity so that Merrill doesn't get there first.
Because its not 'inevitable' at all. In fact, its not even remotely expected. Apostates finally doing something dumb and going abomination happens all the time in Ferelden (christ, it happens in Kirkwall alone
how often? How many insane mages did we meet in the course of an average week?); people willingly letting demons eat them to try to save someone else is a
tad rarer. And yet you absolve Greagoir and still blame Merrill. That's trying to have it both ways.
Modifié par cglasgow, 23 mars 2011 - 04:12 .