Aller au contenu

Photo

Can someone explain the appeal of the partially insane/chaotic stupid Merrill?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
422 réponses à ce sujet

#326
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

So you would consider yourself responsible for the hypothetical traffic accident, as well. Ok.


If it's an accident no one's at fault. There's no accident when you make a Faustian deal with the devil. There's always a price to pay.


And Merril was perfectly prepared to pay that price.

It is the people jumping in and trying to pay it for her who are harming themselves.

#327
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

You knew that people die in traffic. You just didn't care, and now all those people are dead.

Just because you had to cross that road.


Then, yes, I'm to blame. Someone's always at fault for auto-accidents anyway.

#328
Gorthaur X

Gorthaur X
  • Members
  • 282 messages
...I think that about concludes this particular disagreement.

#329
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

So you would consider yourself responsible for the hypothetical traffic accident, as well. Ok.


If it's an accident no one's at fault. There's no accident when you make a Faustian deal with the devil. There's always a price to pay.


And Merril was perfectly prepared to pay that price.

It is the people jumping in and trying to pay it for her who are harming themselves.


But wouldn't have if not for Merrill's actions.

Kid starts a fire in the house because despite being told to not play with matches the kid just enjoyes playing with matches too much. The fire grows out of control.

The kid's mother is outside and sees the now raging fire and without thought for herself jumps into the fire and carries her unconscious child out of the fire. The mother collapses and dies from smoke inhalation.

The child is at fault for starting the fire and is responsible for its mother's death.

#330
cglasgow

cglasgow
  • Members
  • 499 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Thats like saying Gregoir and Irving are responsible for the Chantry bombing because they were too easy on Anders.

They're not to blame. Anders is because he joined with Justice willingly.

And yet when Meredith willingly gives herself to Audacity, its somehow Merrill's fault?   A tad inconsistent, don't you think?

Also, if Greagoir had simply taken Anders out and made him Tranquil or cut his head off after six separate escape attempts, then the Chantry would never have been bombed!   Bad, bad Greagoir!  You're totally responsible for not being able to see years into the future!

#331
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages
Merril is not starting fires for the lulz.

A fire growing out of control is an easily foreseeable consequence of playing with matches.

Marethari whoring herself out to a demon is not a foreseeable consequence of talking with a demon.

#332
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

And yet when Meredith willingly gives herself to Audacity, its somehow Merrill's fault?


Yeahbuwhu?

Also, if Greagoir had simply taken Anders out and made him Tranquil or cut his head off after six separate escape attempts, then the Chantry would never have been bombed! Bad, bad Greagoir! You're totally responsible for not being able to see years into the future!


That really has nothing in common with Merrill's actions directly causing the actions of her storyline. Anders did not do anything in this game because of Gregoir. This is like blaming Anders' dad because he didn't wear a rubber.

#333
Dr. Nexas

Dr. Nexas
  • Members
  • 177 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

So you would consider yourself responsible for the hypothetical traffic accident, as well. Ok.


If it's an accident no one's at fault. There's no accident when you make a Faustian deal with the devil. There's always a price to pay.


And Merril was perfectly prepared to pay that price.

It is the people jumping in and trying to pay it for her who are harming themselves.


But wouldn't have if not for Merrill's actions.

Kid starts a fire in the house because despite being told to not play with matches the kid just enjoyes playing with matches too much. The fire grows out of control.

The kid's mother is outside and sees the now raging fire and without thought for herself jumps into the fire and carries her unconscious child out of the fire. The mother collapses and dies from smoke inhalation.

The child is at fault for starting the fire and is responsible for its mother's death.


That analogy implies that Merrill's blood magic was already out of control. That was not the case. The equivalent is a child using matches in a controlled experiment and the mother snatching them away and settting herself on fire to prevent the child from doing so on accident.

#334
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

Merril is not starting fires for the lulz.

A fire growing out of control is an easily foreseeable consequence of playing with matches.

Marethari whoring herself out to a demon is not a foreseeable consequence of talking with a demon.


I think we're talking in circles now.

No one's opinion is changing anytime soon.

#335
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

That analogy implies that Merrill's blood magic was already out of control. That was not the case. The equivalent is a child using matches in a controlled experiment and the mother snatching them away and settting herself on fire to prevent the child from doing so on accident.


The Keeper and possibly Hawke took the matches away before. Merrill continues to play with fire.

#336
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages
That is because you aren't thinking properly.

#337
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

That is because you aren't thinking properly.


/facepalm.

Merrill's a blood mage and dealer with demons. She isn't some innocent cute character. She's a cute character who's obession leads to the deaths of her clan members.

It's all pretty cause and effect.

#338
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages
Only if you think that blood mage always equals inherently evil or stupid.

Merril goes six years without harming anybody or turning into an abomination, something we haven't seen from any other bloodmage.

The only person who gets harmed in relation to Merrils bloodmagic harms herself when there was only a possibility of harm to Merril.

#339
cglasgow

cglasgow
  • Members
  • 499 messages

That really has nothing in common with Merrill's actions directly causing the actions of her storyline. Anders did not do anything in this game because of Greagoir.

Of course he did.  Greagoir should have used his powers to be able to see six years in the future and know that the end result of his not killing Anders for his flagrant apostate-ness would be Anders going abomination and killing people.  After all, going abomination and killing people is an entirely foreseeable result of letting an apostate run around too long!  Ask any templar in Kirkwall!  You should expect it!

In case you hadn't figured this out yet, that was sarcasm.  The problem is, the whole 'it's Merrill's fault that Merethari died' logic is the exact same brand of logical fail.   Its blaming Merrill for not being able to look seven years into the damn future, when she starts her experiments, and see that the 'inevitable' ending is Marethari whoring herself out to Audacity so that Merrill doesn't get there first. 

Because its not 'inevitable' at all.  In fact, its not even remotely expected.   Apostates finally doing something dumb and going abomination happens all the time in Ferelden (christ, it happens in Kirkwall alone how often?  How many insane mages did we meet in the course of an average week?); people willingly letting demons eat them to try to save someone else is a tad rarer.  And yet you absolve Greagoir and still blame Merrill.   That's trying to have it both ways.

Modifié par cglasgow, 23 mars 2011 - 04:12 .


#340
Gorthaur X

Gorthaur X
  • Members
  • 282 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...
This is like blaming Anders' dad because he didn't wear a rubber.

Exactly.

Anders' dad not being able to foresee the destruction of the Chantry and wearing a... sheep's intestine or whatever to prevent it is exactly the equivalent of Merrill not being able to foresee Marethari's actions.

Your assignment of blame on a person whose failure is not being psychic in one case but not the other is completely arbitrary.

Modifié par Gorthaur X, 23 mars 2011 - 04:12 .


#341
Dr. Nexas

Dr. Nexas
  • Members
  • 177 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

That analogy implies that Merrill's blood magic was already out of control. That was not the case. The equivalent is a child using matches in a controlled experiment and the mother snatching them away and settting herself on fire to prevent the child from doing so on accident.


The Keeper and possibly Hawke took the matches away before. Merrill continues to play with fire.


Merrill wasn't playing with fire. She was using a bunsen burner, while wearing saftety, and having fire extinguisher on hand.

#342
Emperor Iaius I

Emperor Iaius I
  • Members
  • 1 158 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

That is because you aren't thinking properly.


/facepalm.

Merrill's a blood mage and dealer with demons. She isn't some innocent cute character. She's a cute character who's obession leads to the deaths of her clan members.

It's all pretty cause and effect.


An independent intervening action always defeats proximate causation and becomes the new proximate cause. This is pretty basic logic / legal theory. Marethari is the definition of an independent intervening actor--she made her conscious choice. I mean, good grief, her best attempts at stopping Merrill are: Act I: "Are you sure?" Act II: "Let me give this tool to your buddy." Act III: "I'll become an abomination and not tell anybody!"

#343
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Emperor Iaius I wrote...
 I mean, good grief, her best attempts at stopping Merrill are: Act I: "Are you sure?" Act II: "Let me give this tool to your buddy." Act III: "I'll become an abomination and not tell anybody!"


Pretty much.

Here I thought we might actually experience the famed wisdom of Dalish keepers, after we've seen the brilliance of Zathrian and Velanna (aspired to be a keeper), and we get this.

#344
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

Dr. Nexas wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

That analogy implies that Merrill's blood magic was already out of control. That was not the case. The equivalent is a child using matches in a controlled experiment and the mother snatching them away and settting herself on fire to prevent the child from doing so on accident.


The Keeper and possibly Hawke took the matches away before. Merrill continues to play with fire.


Merrill wasn't playing with fire. She was using a bunsen burner, while wearing saftety, and having fire extinguisher on hand.


Drop the metaphor. What did she do to prepare herself against the demon?

What?

Bring Hawke to kill her if she went Abomination? That's not really preparing for anything. And she's given in to demons twice already. It's not like she's taken any one's advice into consideration. The clan is ignorant, and the Keeper has no idea what's she talking about. And if Hawke keeps the tool then Hawke has no right to be involved even though Merrill drug Hawke into it because she 'couldn't talk to the Keeper alone.'

#345
Gorthaur X

Gorthaur X
  • Members
  • 282 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Bring Hawke to kill her if she went Abomination? That's not really preparing for anything. And she's given in to demons twice already.

I'm assuming that Feynriel's Pride would be one of those two times, but what's the second? Certainly not Audacity, since if accepting any aid from a spirit under any circumstances counts as "giving in" to them, then virtually every Mage Warden has been irredeemably corrupt since their origin story.

Which is obviously not the case.

#346
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

I'm assuming that Feynriel's Pride would be one of those two times, but what's the second? Certainly not Audacity, since if accepting any aid from a spirit under any circumstances counts as "giving in" to them, then virtually every Mage Warden has been irredeemably corrupt since their origin story.

Which is obviously not the case.


Original deal with Audacity to learn blood magic. And the Fade Pride Demon, yes.

And the Mage Origin doesn't have the Warden giving in to that Pride demon. You prove it's a demon, it laughs and says something along the lines that he'll be waiting....there's always going to be temptation.

#347
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages
And before that, you accepted it's help.

#348
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Original deal with Audacity to learn blood magic. And the Fade Pride Demon, yes.

And the Mage Origin doesn't have the Warden giving in to that Pride demon. You prove it's a demon, it laughs and says something along the lines that he'll be waiting....there's always going to be temptation.


No, he tells the mage protagonist to keep his wits about him, because some tests never end.

#349
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...
What?

Bring Hawke to kill her if she went Abomination? That's not really preparing for anything. And she's given in to demons twice already. It's not like she's taken any one's advice into consideration. The clan is ignorant, and the Keeper has no idea what's she talking about. And if Hawke keeps the tool then Hawke has no right to be involved even though Merrill drug Hawke into it because she 'couldn't talk to the Keeper alone.'


Explain how she's given in twice.
The first time, she made a deal. This is not giving in.
The second time in the Fade, everybody gave in, so that's not proof of anything.

#350
cglasgow

cglasgow
  • Members
  • 499 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Drop the metaphor. What did she do to prepare herself against the demon?

What?

Bring Hawke to kill her if she went Abomination? That's not really preparing for anything.

Really?  

Because that's what templars do for a Harrowing.  'All right, apprentice; you've psyched yourself up as much as you can, you've studied about this, you know not to trust anything you talk to in there... now get in there and face that demon!  I'll be standing right here with this big sword in case you screw up.'