Aller au contenu

Photo

Bring back Origins for Dragon Age 3 please.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
129 réponses à ce sujet

#51
NRO TYN

NRO TYN
  • Members
  • 653 messages
I support this thread

#52
Ganondorf2002

Ganondorf2002
  • Members
  • 171 messages
In DA3 I could see having one or multiple origin stories, depending on who the heroe(s) are. The Greywardens were fun in DA1, not really needed in DA2 but nice to see as background characters with a clouded purpose. I figure that DA2 will have one or two expansions and that will further Hawke's character. If in DA3 they want to bring back the wardens it should be new wardens not yours from DA1. The ones from DA1 and Awakening could make cameo appearences maybe having your main warden from there as the Commander still. Nothing in the DA universe is set in stone and there are so many storylines to follow up with. Personally I would like to see DA3 take a different turn in some events. Who ever the good guys are you have a main goal. Along the way unfold much more about Flemeth, and the Architect. The Architect could have his story easily expanded from the second book and Awakening. Or say at the end of the game you complete your main goal but as an adverse effect you discover one of the old Gods, and the darkspawn are already in the area. They awakening the Old God and it becomes tainted. Boom game ends there, then you would have a good setup of what to expect in DA4 which could last for 10+ yrs to show how a longer blight effects the land. Anyways those are just some ideas.

#53
Daryl_A

Daryl_A
  • Members
  • 6 messages
No thanks. The origins in DA:O were an interesting idea, but they meant little overall. Not only that, but only one or two were genuinely interesting.

I'd rather sacrifice the variable origin story for a tighter, more cohesive overall story.

Modifié par Daryl_A, 23 mars 2011 - 03:51 .


#54
FedericoV

FedericoV
  • Members
  • 1 860 messages
Origins back? Only if it really changes the experience during the game and does not fight with voice over. I prefer a voice overed charachter over having +backgrounds (even because I would never play an elf or a dwarf).

#55
mander83

mander83
  • Members
  • 94 messages
I liked the different origins but, in all honesty, I only ever played two all the way through (HNF and CE). I've played all of the others up until Ostagar. At that point, I lose interest. The rest of the game will be almost identical.

I'd rather they put effort into produces one well developed main character than multiple origins. In a perfect world they'd be able to do both but we all know that isn't the case.

It wouldn't bother me at all if we never had more origins or played as grey wardens ever again (I was never that attached to the wardens, I guess).

#56
ashwind

ashwind
  • Members
  • 3 150 messages
DA3 - Choose your Origin

1 ) The Champion of Kirkwall
2 ) The Warden

The story will be told based on their individual perspective.

:P

#57
happy_daiz

happy_daiz
  • Members
  • 7 963 messages
I have to admit, my Dalish elf in Origins was super cute, but I agree with many of the posters here - we've kinda been there already, and it really isn't necessary to rehash it for DA3. Depending on the story, an origins-centric story may not even make sense.

I'm hoping that the warden and Hawke cross paths with Morrigan/Flemeth in the next one. I would be curious to see how choices made in DAO and DA2 would shake out in a third installment if that were the case.

Of course, if the warden was a martyr in DAO... wow, how do they wrap their arms around all this stuff?

Modifié par happy_daiz, 23 mars 2011 - 04:59 .


#58
Hoogies123

Hoogies123
  • Members
  • 189 messages
I miss NWN where your character was literally your character from head to toe. Screw removing a loved feature for a voiced main character, I can do without.

#59
Lord Gremlin

Lord Gremlin
  • Members
  • 2 927 messages
I'm all for Origins in DA3 - the more customization, the better. Also, I like roleplaying a bitter elf.

And while we at it... We have a Warden story, a human Champion story... I'd like to see a Qunari story, really. Imagine how many hours one can spend on character creation to adjust the horns perfectly...

#60
OrlesianWardenCommander

OrlesianWardenCommander
  • Members
  • 943 messages
DA2 ain't perfect but origins defiantly wasn't perfect keep it around the same as DA2.

#61
AngelicMachinery

AngelicMachinery
  • Members
  • 4 300 messages
Bring back Oghren for DA3, I want he and Varric in the same party.

#62
Insoluble25x

Insoluble25x
  • Members
  • 20 messages
I tried to give origins a chance but I lost interest, didn't even get half way through the game. I'm actually still playing DA2 since it's release.

Modifié par Insoluble25x, 23 mars 2011 - 05:56 .


#63
TJSolo

TJSolo
  • Members
  • 2 256 messages

Insoluble25x wrote...

I tried to give origins a chance but I lost interest, didn't even get half way through the game. I'm actually still playing DA2 since it's release.


That would be a personal problem.

The origins part of DAO brought out a unique racial experience than just +1dex/-1con most other medievel fantasy games with multiraces have done. I actually that the origins subtitle for the game was a nice mechanic and a good way to "evolve" RPGs.

So yeah I am going to be pro-option here and say having more races and origins would benefit this series more than a single canon character.

#64
Xanfyrst

Xanfyrst
  • Members
  • 76 messages
I can see Cassandra the Seeker becoming a player character in a DLC for DA2 on her search for Hawke.

#65
Taura-Tierno

Taura-Tierno
  • Members
  • 887 messages
Honestly, the origins were a good idea, and were fun to play, but after the start of the game, felt pretty meaningless. They didn't matter as much ad they could've, and I get that having them matter a lot would be really costly, so I don't blame Bioware for that. They were still fun and innovative, but I'd rather take one origin with more consequences and reactions through the game than several that don't matter as much.

Not that I'd be opposed to origins again, of course ... But I don't think it's something they just have to do. Just slapping on some origins wouldn't make for a good game. Depends entirely on what story they want to tell. Besides, origins would not be ad unique and innovative the second time.

#66
Nick Fox

Nick Fox
  • Members
  • 168 messages
More DA O depth and style overall (more gritty and less arcade+customization+dialog way) would be much appreciated for me with some additions ofc.

I see many speculate about DA series to be a trilogy, where does that come from? It could be ofc but personally I think you have a rather big world that you can expand on in a couple of more games. Showing off Orelias, Terwinter, Antiva etc, and my personal favorite the "wastes" or whatever its called that lies beyond the Kocari wilds.
A real badlands type of place it seems to be, dont know but it intrigues me.

Image IPB

Modifié par Nick Fox, 23 mars 2011 - 07:06 .


#67
Trohlsruhk

Trohlsruhk
  • Members
  • 8 messages
I predict that Hawke's Story WILL be "wrapped" up in an Expansion and DA 3 will take place in Orlais. As far as the upsetting events in DA 2 ( world changing event I mean) I think this is a predetermined course for the long hual, not something that can just be put back together by one man ( Hawke or otherwise). After all, with Blight only happening every several hundred years or so you need a world in Turmoil to create "epic" stories.

As far as Origin's go. They aren't the whole of the first game in any way. Nor would they have changed the over all aspect of DA 2 ( in so far as the Heavy story laden components go). What they would have done is offered yet another "customization" for RPG lover to explore with thier characters. Allowing you to choose even more particvualiars of WHO Hawke was and How he went about influencing World changing Events.

#68
tfcreative

tfcreative
  • Members
  • 127 messages
I liked the origins, but also did a few of them just to get to ostagar and then there was no point. It was neat, but I don't need all of my games to have origins now.

#69
Elite Midget

Elite Midget
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages
Bioware - I support making money!

What?

#70
PoisonDagger

PoisonDagger
  • Members
  • 26 messages
Well i just hope to not see dragon age 3 until at least for a few more years or so or more...just so we know that it was not rushed and whatever.

#71
TJSolo

TJSolo
  • Members
  • 2 256 messages

Honestly, the origins were a good idea, and were fun to play, but after the start of the game, felt pretty meaningless. They didn't matter as much ad they could've, and I get that having them matter a lot would be really costly, so I don't blame Bioware for that. They were still fun and innovative, but I'd rather take one origin with more consequences and reactions through the game than several that don't matter as much.


The point of races and origins were to flavor the player's experiences with subtle differences not alter the experience greatly. Adding subtly to games requires TLC and for the time spent the subtly is easily dismissed by certain kinds of players.

#72
MajorJoeKickass

MajorJoeKickass
  • Members
  • 108 messages
If Dragon age 3 come out its mostly likely to be about either the Seeker finding Hawke or the Warden to end what is to seems to be a war that were breaking out in Thedas or/and Ferelden about mages and templars fighting and such.

#73
dewayne31

dewayne31
  • Members
  • 1 452 messages
if da3 comes out we be hawke, unless the dlc and possible expanison finish hawke story and it is now hawke story..atleast it look like it is. but no i'm for origins again it was cool but matter little

#74
Drasill

Drasill
  • Members
  • 255 messages
I bet the overwhelming majority of Origins players only ever played one Origin thus making it useless when the resources could have gone towards other things.

#75
TJSolo

TJSolo
  • Members
  • 2 256 messages
Are you implying that the majority of Origins players all picked the same origin or that the majority of Origins players stuck with one origin for themselves?
I don't see how either is an argument against having choice.