Aller au contenu

Photo

Siding with the Templars is fine, but siding with Meredith isn`t


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
4350 réponses à ce sujet

#3876
Yakko77

Yakko77
  • Members
  • 2 794 messages

The Angry One wrote...

The problem is the endgame makes the leaders of both sides crazy bonkers.
One is an abomination waiting to happen, the other has been turned by Soul Edge.


I sort wish there were some 3rd option.  I at times wish I could've channeled my inner Eric Cartman with a, "Screw you guys, I'm going home." response (Leave Kirkwall to its fate and return to Ferelden) or maybe summon my inner Sith Lord with an Emperor Palpetine, "Wipe them all out!" (kill every mage AND  templar you come across) response.

Ah well, as it is, I  sort of inject my person beliefs and my dislike of religious zealotry and side with the mages against the templars who are as a group as dictated by their faith are carrying out an act of genocide vs. the slight lesser evil of random and individual mages engaged in blood magic.

Maybe if there were a way to overthrow Meredith and THEN side with the Templars but alas, as the game is, I strongly dislike siding with the templars.

#3877
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Ryzaki wrote...
...My snark meter is broken. 

It broke earlier this week. Please tell me this is snark. 


Absolutely. I felt like the discussion got too serious and I needed a snarklet.

Honestly, I really liked DA:A Anders. He was not very far off from what I'd be if I was a mage, even personality wise. Seeing what he became in DA2 really sucked.

#3878
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

In Exile wrote...
Honestly, I really liked DA:A Anders. He was not very far off from what I'd be if I was a mage, even personality wise. Seeing what he became in DA2 really sucked.


I thought it sucked in a good way and I think Anders is one of the few redeeming things in the game, specifically in Act 3.

#3879
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

In Exile wrote...
Absolutely. I felt like the discussion got too serious and I needed a snarklet. 

Honestly, I really liked DA:A Anders. He was not very far off from what I'd be if I was a mage, even personality wise. Seeing what he became in DA2 really sucked.


Oh good. :lol: 

I don't mind him so much. It's the plot railroading that bugs me. 

And the fact that I can tell Cullen Anders is plotting subversion against the Chantry ye for some mindboggling reason Cullen doesn't immediately arrest Anders. :blink: If Anders needed to use his poop bomb so badly they could've had him escape. Wouldn't be implausable. 

#3880
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

In Exile wrote...
Honestly, I really liked DA:A Anders. He was not very far off from what I'd be if I was a mage, even personality wise. Seeing what he became in DA2 really sucked.


I thought it sucked in a good way and I think Anders is one of the few redeeming things in the game, specifically in Act 3.


Couldn't agree more. Even though I disliked his whiny one-track mind, he did partly of what I felt like doing to that damnable place.

#3881
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Ryzaki wrote...
And the fact that I can tell Cullen Anders is plotting subversion against the Chantry ye for some mindboggling reason Cullen doesn't immediately arrest Anders. :blink: If Anders needed to use his poop bomb so badly they could've had him escape. Wouldn't be implausable. 


I actually did not know about this until recently and I don't know if I should laugh, cry or just roll my eyes.

#3882
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

RangerSG wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

In Exile wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...
I do hope that Thrask and Keran wouldn't maintain the suicide rate.


It's very likely there's not much they can do about that. The lot of a mage is not great; being essentially under house arrest your whole life leads to mental breakdowns.

That's why the Circle desperately needs reform. But reform =! justifying the whackjob behaviour of Anders.

If the only way to reform the Circle is the behavior of Anders...


Given the Ferelden Circle is reformed with a mage PC in Origins, I don't think the *only* way was Anders. He was as whacked as Meredith by then.


Except it WASN'T reformed.  The Chantry said no.  Which just brings us back to the Chantry being completely unwilling to even consider the idea, leaving what Anders did as necessary.

#3883
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...
And the fact that I can tell Cullen Anders is plotting subversion against the Chantry ye for some mindboggling reason Cullen doesn't immediately arrest Anders. :blink: If Anders needed to use his poop bomb so badly they could've had him escape. Wouldn't be implausable. 


I actually did not know about this until recently and I don't know if I should laugh, cry or just roll my eyes.


All three, of course. With some facepalming.

#3884
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Alistairlover94 wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...
And the fact that I can tell Cullen Anders is plotting subversion against the Chantry ye for some mindboggling reason Cullen doesn't immediately arrest Anders. :blink: If Anders needed to use his poop bomb so badly they could've had him escape. Wouldn't be implausable. 


I actually did not know about this until recently and I don't know if I should laugh, cry or just roll my eyes.


All three, of course. With some facepalming.


At the same time.

#3885
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

not necessarily. We don't know that these books would only be viewable to the First Enchanter. Especially since Animate Dead, a necromancy like spell, is in the Spirit school of magic.

We also know that Quentin was doing research into the Harvester, a "super-abomination" as per a David Gaider post. I think Quentin may have been doing research into various fields of abomination lore and knowledge when he was sane, and that's what Orsino found so interesting (we have no idea how old that letter we found is. Orsino could've ceased contact with Quentin the moment he found out he was murdering, but still was afraid to report him to Meredith).

I won't deny that Orsino had been practicing blood magic for who knows how long, but I got the impression he never used it once before outside of using his own blood in secret just to have a better knowledge of it.


Never mind that when Hawke comes across that letter, she has "O" to go by, not "Orsino" and not only is there no reason to assume those books came from the Kirkwall Circle, you have the fact that Hawke at the time is a little preoccupied with more urgent matters than taking the time to ponder who "O" is. 

A clear-thinking Hawke might be able to wonder if O refers to Orsino and guess that the books probably came from the Circle, but it isn't an all-out given, as any apostate, blood mage or otherwise, could have owned the books, and under the circumstances, Hawke isn't likely going to have the presence of mind to think about that letter until after the dust is settled and her mother cremated.  Jeez. 

#3886
Guest_Alistairlover94_*

Guest_Alistairlover94_*
  • Guests

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Alistairlover94 wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...
And the fact that I can tell Cullen Anders is plotting subversion against the Chantry ye for some mindboggling reason Cullen doesn't immediately arrest Anders. :blink: If Anders needed to use his poop bomb so badly they could've had him escape. Wouldn't be implausable. 


I actually did not know about this until recently and I don't know if I should laugh, cry or just roll my eyes.


All three, of course. With some facepalming.


At the same time.




#3887
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
I'm talking about before though. I'm saying that prior to All That Remains, Hawke had never heard Orsino's name so he had no reason to suspect Orsino. After he meets him it stands to reason he'd be somewhat suspicious that the First Enchanter, the highest mage there is in Chantry controlled Circles, would have a name that begins with "O" after he found the note.

 

The fact that you can't hand that note over to Meredith/Cullen makes no sense to me. 

Bah. 

Stupid plot railroading. 


You mean like you can tell Cullen that Anders is plotting something, have Cullen all but come out and say he knows exactly who you're referring to, even with Anders in the party...and nothing?  For the life of me I still don't get why that bit of dialogue is an option.  I figure it's got to be an early storyline that was cut, but the dialogue left, because I think, aside from the game's refusal to acknowledge a Mage!Hawke (especially bloodmage!Hawke), that's the most idiotic scene in the entire game.

#3888
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Silfren wrote...
I can relate to the crappy situation Irving is in...moreso, having replayed the scene between him and the Mage Warden where she asks about Jowan being made Tranquil.  But yes, I still find his practice abhorrent. 


I replayed the scene to take a look at what it really was like, and the thing that's really uncomfortable about it is how much Irving wants to burn the Chantry. You can really see that he feels powerless to an extent. He doesn't view Jowan so much as a person, but the fact that Jowan is nevertheless a mage that has to be sacrificed mages his blood boil and makes him want to avenge himself.

This could be more a case of meta-gaming, but one thing I've always found to be lacking in character interactions is subtlety.  If you know anything at all about body language and pay attention to what people say and how they say it, it's generally easy to tell when someone is lying if they're not a practiced liar.  But both Origins and DA2 make it as easy to figure out when a character is and isn't lying as it is when watching a soap opera or a children's program.  It's painfully obvious when characters are lying, and when they're not, whether it's Loghain, Anders, Jowan, or even a minor NPC like Idunna.  So yes, it's obvious that Jowan is lying early on about not using blood magic, but it's also obvious later on when he's finally coming clean. 


No, meta-game wise it's pretty clear when someone wants to do well later.

But my point is different: Jowan was twice stupidly selfish. Yes, he wanted to do right by everyone in the end, but he still did some very major wrongs for not very good reasons. Blood magic was, well, dumb. But without knowing more about Jowan as a mage... it's understandable why he migh have done it (e.g. fear of being made tranquil). It's hard to say that I wouldn't have done the same where I in his position. Tranquility is so much worse than death, it's difficult to fathom not being willing to do anything to avoid that end.

So I don't think Jowan's a threat because I believe him when he finally admits that he dabbled with blood magic, and only because he thought it would make him a better mage.  He never once comes across to me as a mage who wanted whatever power blood magic could give him, but was mostly just curious about it.  He may be foolish and reckless, and yes, those things can be dangerous in themselves, but that doesn't equate to his seeking the power to dominate others.


He's also a liar, and perfectly willing to murder someone for the right cause. He could easily 'give someone a nudge' because it might help a sympathetic person, convince a tavern owner he needs a place to stay because he's really cold, ask for a little food in return because he's just so hungry, ask a merchant for a sovereign, so he can make his way away from the Circle... and suddenly he's controlling minds.

Like Loghain proved, it isn't necesarily hard to sweet talk Jowan into committing an atrocity. Recklessness, with the wrong combination of power, can be really dangerous.

As for his poisoning of Arl Eamon, well, Jowan states flat out that he did so at Loghain's behest, and adds "Why wouldn't I trust Teyrn Loghain?"  The fact is that at the beginning of Origins, Loghain is considered a liberating hero by all of Ferelden, and he has a well established reputation as a patriot who would do anything to protect his nation.  So it may seem gullible to the rest of us, but it's a fair point.  Given Loghain's reputation and status, a great many people would not believe he had anything but Ferelden's best interests at heart if he told them to do something that, coming from anyone else, would seem insanity.  And Jowan also points out that Loghain offered to settle things with the Chantry so that Jowan wouldn't be facing execution.  I can absolutely see a case where Jowan, having heard all his life of the great Hero of River Dane, would not have any reason to believe Loghain had malicious intent, and also being baited by the carrot of escaping punishment, would be eager to do whatever he was told.  And, since there is also some indication that Loghain didn't actually intend to kill Eamon but to keep him incapacitated until he had secured his position, that Jowan didn't think he was putting anyone's life in danger.  Gullible and stupid, sure, and criminally so, but not evil. 


As I said before: Jowan wanted to murder someone that was a respect political figure because a respect political figure asked him to. Would you murder someone under the guise of patriotism? Loghain offered him a sweet deal - kill someone for me and I'd erase your crimes. Giving in to that isn't even patriotism - it's outright just being selfish. It's 2 steps removed from just outright murdering someone for cash.

Jowan tells you he did it because he was a patriot... but that doesn't mean Jowan did it because he was a patriot.

I, and others, have said repeatedly that we don't have a problem with children having to go to a school for training.  What we object to is the forced and permanent removal of children from their families, to say nothing of not telling parents where their children are going, threatening them, and even taking the children away in chains.  I'm getting a little sick of having to repeat myself, frankly.  I have said time and time and bloody time again that I'm okay with children having to go away for training. 


So you come and ask nicely - and the parents tell you to go **** yourself.

What do you do then?

More generally, do you start funding trips for the parents to visit their children? What do you do if the children don't want to run off to school? What if you take the children home, and then they refuse to leave again?

You have to repeat yourself because you haven't at all taken the time to consider whether the system would even work. Like I have said repeatedly: the Circle exists because non-mages fear mages. Co-existence is going to require some counter-balance of mages for the sake of equality; otherwise mages will, in virtue of their natural superiority, run everything.

Let's say, now, our 18 year old mage goes back to his village. Alone, and unwatched. Not that talented of a mage or charismatic of a person - pretty mediocre, and after a pretty girl (or boy). And he (or she) starts having dreams at night. Dreaming that the person likes them, wants them...

... and it turns out that's the work of a desire demon. Every night. Non-stop.

That's what mages have to live with. How do you keep the mage safe, in that circumstance? How do you keep the village safe? Even if you have templar equivalents stationed there, that's just a worse case scenario to fight an abomination if it happens.

It doesn't seem like even Tevinter had (or has) the kinds of freedoms you're thinking of.

#3889
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

Silfren wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
I'm talking about before though. I'm saying that prior to All That Remains, Hawke had never heard Orsino's name so he had no reason to suspect Orsino. After he meets him it stands to reason he'd be somewhat suspicious that the First Enchanter, the highest mage there is in Chantry controlled Circles, would have a name that begins with "O" after he found the note.

 

The fact that you can't hand that note over to Meredith/Cullen makes no sense to me. 

Bah. 

Stupid plot railroading. 


You mean like you can tell Cullen that Anders is plotting something, have Cullen all but come out and say he knows exactly who you're referring to, even with Anders in the party...and nothing?  For the life of me I still don't get why that bit of dialogue is an option.  I figure it's got to be an early storyline that was cut, but the dialogue left, because I think, aside from the game's refusal to acknowledge a Mage!Hawke (especially bloodmage!Hawke), that's the most idiotic scene in the entire game.



In all it's facepalming worthy glory. 

#3890
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Rifneno wrote...

She tried to use Faith's power out of desperation, and she didn't know it would almost kill her.  Neither did Faith, from the impression I got.  The spirit healer specialization even says templars watch closely over spirit healers because these are mages that have shown they'll deal with Fade creatures.  Meaning even the templars aren't worried a good spirit will turn bad, and that it's common enough practice for them to have guidelines on it.  Lastly, I don't have a link to it, but I recall DG saying a spirit possessing someone is different than a demon possessing someone.  Which indicates that there is indeed a fundamental difference.


Eh, I don't think you've got the right of this one.   I think it indicates that the templars are equally suspicious of mages working with spirits as they are demons, not less, precisely because templars will watch spirit healers even more closely than other mages.

"Few mages are watched more closely by the templars than spirit healers.
For all the good they can do, their consorting with any denizen of the
demon-infested Fade is a matter of intense suspicion.
Still, the
benefits outweigh the risks, if only just."

#3891
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

You don't have to think the whole circle is irredeemable to annull it.


That depends.  Are you arguing the possible reasoning that Hawke can take when she sides with Meredith?  Or the legal reason for calling for Annulment?   Because that IS the only legal reason the Right can be called--if the Circle has been deemed to be beyond redemption.  

#3892
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Ryzaki wrote...
In all it's facepalming worthy glory. 


...


...


...

That's horrible. Horrible. Terrible.

Cullen knows it's Anders and that Anders is a known apostate and hangs out with Hawke and Anders is there, and Cullen is all like - cool, I'll tell someone sometime.

The only possible justification is that Cullen is functionally retarded. Think about it - the trauma in Ferelden so addled him that he is no longer capable of thought.

He sees Hawke cast magic but is too stupid to understand Hawke is a mage. It works for everything!

Modifié par In Exile, 23 mai 2011 - 09:33 .


#3893
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

Silfren wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

You don't have to think the whole circle is irredeemable to annull it.


That depends.  Are you arguing the possible reasoning that Hawke can take when she sides with Meredith?  Or the legal reason for calling for Annulment?   Because that IS the only legal reason the Right can be called--if the Circle has been deemed to be beyond redemption.  

That is not what I was discussing. 

It is perfectly reasonable to my Hawke to go along with the anullment without thinking every mage was guilty. That is all. 

No need to get into the debate that never ends. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 23 mai 2011 - 09:40 .


#3894
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Silfren he does say he wants to kill every Templar in creation. At the tree in Amaranthine, he says he wants to shoot lightning at fools and settle down with a nice girl. You tell him he's aiming too low and he replies back with "True, I want to shoot fireballs at every Templar in creation."


No, he's giving a predictable response to the Warden's reply about aiming too low.  Context matters, and there's nothing there to indicate he's hiding his true feelings beneath humor.  It's just a non-serious remark, not meant to mean anything sinister.  Answering "you're aiming too low" with hyperbole is one of the oldest and cheapest forms of snark in existence.

#3895
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

In Exile wrote...
Absolutely. I felt like the discussion got too serious and I needed a snarklet. 

Honestly, I really liked DA:A Anders. He was not very far off from what I'd be if I was a mage, even personality wise. Seeing what he became in DA2 really sucked.


Oh good. :lol: 

I don't mind him so much. It's the plot railroading that bugs me. 

And the fact that I can tell Cullen Anders is plotting subversion against the Chantry ye for some mindboggling reason Cullen doesn't immediately arrest Anders. :blink: If Anders needed to use his poop bomb so badly they could've had him escape. Wouldn't be implausable. 


I'm just curious...do you consider gunpowder to be "poop?"  Or do you just not realize that sela petrae and drakestone equate to real world components of gunpowder?  I'm just amused at the sheer number of people who keep referring to it as "Anders pee/poop bomb," who don't realize that those are real ingredients.

#3896
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

In Exile wrote...

But my point is different: Jowan was twice stupidly selfish. Yes, he wanted to do right by everyone in the end, but he still did some very major wrongs for not very good reasons. Blood magic was, well, dumb. But without knowing more about Jowan as a mage... it's understandable why he migh have done it (e.g. fear of being made tranquil). It's hard to say that I wouldn't have done the same where I in his position. Tranquility is so much worse than death, it's difficult to fathom not being willing to do anything to avoid that end.


Well, there's no indication he learned blood magic out of fear of being made Tranquil.  I'm not sure that's what you mean, but it seems to be what you wrote.  it's clear why he dabbled in it to begin with: curiosity.  That he resorted to the blood magic he learned afterward, when he was trying to escape, is a different matter.


He's also a liar, and perfectly willing to murder someone for the right cause. He could easily 'give someone a nudge' because it might help a sympathetic person, convince a tavern owner he needs a place to stay because he's really cold, ask for a little food in return because he's just so hungry, ask a merchant for a sovereign, so he can make his way away from the Circle... and suddenly he's controlling minds.

Like Loghain proved, it isn't necesarily hard to sweet talk Jowan into committing an atrocity. Recklessness, with the wrong combination of power, can be really dangerous.


This is just speculation on your part.  I already made it clear I don't think he's perfectly willing to murder someone, and I also don't think he can be just dismissed as a liar.  Yes, he lied in the beginning, but I don't think he continues to.  I think he's being completely honest with your Warden, mage or otherwise, in Redcliffe.  I'm not sure what you're getting at all, here, since it's clear I don't agree he would or even could do any of those things.  He made some stupid mistakes, yes, but that, again, doesn't equate to his either being evil or being motivated by purely selfish aims.  And by the time he's incarcerated in the dungeon, he's a broken and remorseful man. 

As I said before: Jowan wanted to murder someone that was a respect political figure because a respect political figure asked him to. Would you murder someone under the guise of patriotism? Loghain offered him a sweet deal - kill someone for me and I'd erase your crimes. Giving in to that isn't even patriotism - it's outright just being selfish. It's 2 steps removed from just outright murdering someone for cash.

Jowan tells you he did it because he was a patriot... but that doesn't mean Jowan did it because he was a patriot.


*sigh* Didn't I already make the point about characters being obvious when they're lying and being truthful?  Bioware doesn't leave much room for interpretation, unless you're playing a dumb-as-a-box-of-rocks Warden.  It's as easy to tell when a DA character is lying or being truthful as it is with a character in a dumbed-down children's program or a soap opera.  Meta-gaming or otherwise.  He's not lying when he tells your Warden that.  And you're ignoring what I already pointed out--Jowan was pushed by the notion of having his crimes pardoned, but he also tells you that "Why wouldn't I trust Teyrn Loghain?"  Call it naivete if you want, and it definitely is, but I've got no problem with that statement....it's a natural human reaction.  Loghain isn't just any man, isn't just any well-known community hero, he's the bloody Hero of River Dane, who liberated Ferelden, and also the most powerful man in the nation, both because of his political status as a teyrn and because of his popularity.  It's perfectly understandable that anyone would leap to do something Loghain asked them, even something as crazy as poisoning an arl.

So you come and ask nicely - and the parents tell you to go **** yourself.

What do you do then?

More generally, do you start funding trips for the parents to visit their children? What do you do if the children don't want to run off to school? What if you take the children home, and then they refuse to leave again?

You have to repeat yourself because you haven't at all taken the time to consider whether the system would even work. Like I have said repeatedly: the Circle exists because non-mages fear mages. Co-existence is going to require some counter-balance of mages for the sake of equality; otherwise mages will, in virtue of their natural superiority, run everything.

Let's say, now, our 18 year old mage goes back to his village. Alone, and unwatched. Not that talented of a mage or charismatic of a person - pretty mediocre, and after a pretty girl (or boy). And he (or she) starts having dreams at night. Dreaming that the person likes them, wants them...

... and it turns out that's the work of a desire demon. Every night. Non-stop.

That's what mages have to live with. How do you keep the mage safe, in that circumstance? How do you keep the village safe? Even if you have templar equivalents stationed there, that's just a worse case scenario to fight an abomination if it happens.

It doesn't seem like even Tevinter had (or has) the kinds of freedoms you're thinking of.


I addressed this the first time you brought it up to me directly, about a hundred pages or so back.  I'm not inclined to do it again.  The fact that I haven't taken the time to draw up a detailed point-by-point analysis for an alternative to the current Circle system does not invalidate my opinion that the existing system is immoral and unjust.  And I can't figure out why you think I should do so.  It's one thing to debate the question of whether the Circle is or isn't just, but quite another for you to actually expect me to devote so much bloody time to a freaking thesis paper on my alternative solution, as if we were discussing an actual real-world problem.

I've never once claimed that there is any singular, perfect solution that will be completely failsafe.  I have, in fact, acknoweldged several times that it's a given that with mages living free, abominations and blood magic will happen.  But it doesn't follow that that justifies locking mages away for merely existing.

#3897
GavrielKay

GavrielKay
  • Members
  • 1 336 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

In Exile wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

You don't have to think the whole circle is irredeemable to annull it.


Wait - are you saying you think there's a reason to annul the Circle when you believe explicitly it includes killing innocents?


...My snark meter is broken. 

It broke earlier this week. Please tell me this is snark. 


I have no idea if In Exile was being snarky, but I do know that the RoA is supposed to be called only when the circle is considered irredeemable. 

#3898
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

In Exile wrote...
...


...


...

That's horrible. Horrible. Terrible.

Cullen knows it's Anders and that Anders is a known apostate and hangs out with Hawke and Anders is there, and Cullen is all like - cool, I'll tell someone sometime.

The only possible justification is that Cullen is functionally retarded. Think about it - the trauma in Ferelden so addled him that he is no longer capable of thought.

He sees Hawke cast magic but is too stupid to understand Hawke is a mage. It works for everything!


It's not Cullen being dumb. It's the Plot induced stupidity that folows Hawke and Anders around and conforms everyone to it to get it on track. Hawke and Cullen are just particularly heavily hit examples. 

Silfren wrote...
I'm just curious...do you consider gunpowder to be "poop?"  Or do you just not realize that sela petrae and drakestone equate to real world components of gunpowder?  I'm just amused at the sheer number of people who keep referring to it as "Anders pee/poop bomb," who don't realize that those are real ingredients.


Indeed. I'm amused by the people who don't know the difference between her and you. :whistle:

Modifié par Ryzaki, 23 mai 2011 - 11:06 .


#3899
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
What I find to be meh is that only the Qunari managed to create gunpowder while the rest are scratching their heads, including the genius dwarves. But then Anders masters the science of explosives in a rotting clinic with bare minimum ingredients and still managed to make it explode either with an implausibly perfect sense of timing, or via remote control.

How?

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 23 mai 2011 - 11:11 .


#3900
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

What I find to be meh is that only the Qunari managed to create gunpowder while the rest are scratching their heads, including the genius dwarves. But then Anders masters the science of explosives in a rotting clinic with bare minimum ingredients and still managed to make it explode either at the perfect time, or via his command.

How?


I highly doubt that was only gunpowder. Yes yes I know the ingrediants. I just think it was mixed with something edit: clarifying before someone jumps down my throat. 

I think it was something of Sandal's. 

If you talk to Bodahn he mentions how Anders is interested in Sandal's work. And we know Sandal makes things go "BOOM". Wouldmake sense how he mastered it. Sandal had tons of practice burning things down. 

And really the whole "only Qunari have gunpowder!" thing felt forced in the first place. With Anders getting his hands on it. (Broke Anders at that) it's laughable. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 23 mai 2011 - 11:16 .